- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 31,057
- Reaction score
- 3,969
- Location
- not here
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Do you or do you not own an M1 carbine?
I own one plus the stock.
Do you or do you not own an M1 carbine?
OMFG....
WTH are you talking about?
You are making NO sense.
You are just making garbage up at this point.
ith assault weaponYou're not trying to teach me anything Bret, you're arguing semantics versus a proven problem ws that has reached the stage of public and political outcry. You and yours have also set up a litmus test wherein if I or others cannot identify every weapon you show and are willing to fit it into a very very narrow scope that forces a square peg into a round hole over the issue, then we have no credibility with the subject. Which is utterly ridiculous and a tactic used by those who have no possible way of overcoming the facts in these issues of assault weapons, the streets, and now terrorism. When I put the very same test you guys, that tactic suddenly didn't mean anything... Pride has nothing to do with it: it's argumentation and debate.
The engine by the way is a supercharged (fully blown) 426 Hemi.
"Turbo charger on top"? Turbos work through the exhaust dude.
You don't know anything about it, or you would have said Bret.
I made my point, and you can't get around the facts.
:2wave:
So, you admit that you don't know what makes up the hardware of an M1.
Good.
So I already told BretJ what it was, so you didn't know what it was until I told him. And you don't even know which of the two makes invented it...
Weak. We're done here.
So, you admit that you don't know what makes up the hardware of an M1.
Good.
Another dodge.
I know what hardware makes up an M1 carbine.
Barrel and Receiver group, the Trigger Housing group, Operating Slide group, and finally the STOCK.
You stated the STOCK lacked hardware.
What hardware does the STOCK lack?
The STOCK.
You do not understand the terminology perhaps?
Is this yet another case of you using the terminology incorrectly?
So, any productive debate with you is now long gone, and this is turning into more of badgering than anything else. Therefore I will no longer respond to such repeated pestering of minute details of no import and miles away form the topic of the thread. If you wish to challenge me on M1 rifle parts, you may start a thread on that topic.
If you have comment or question about the topic and the NRA's threat to the US senate, I'll be happy to answer, but this annoyance is now over.
TRANSLATION: Jet runs from another case of his ignorant use of firearms terminology.
Not to mention he was the one that started the "minute details" argument.
Not to mention he was the one that started the "minute details" argument.
Show me that.
Not to mention he was the one that started the "minute details" argument.
Still waiting...
To be honest I looked back and I cant really tell definitively who started it, we all contributed.