1.)Liar your post 216 was in response to my post.
Ridiculous, asinine and avoidance. When you post here it is open to comment. It answered your question like it or not.
See the Brady bill. Features. It would be stupid at present to try and ban current possession but future sales are easy.
The Brady bill was based on features.
2.)My post was open for anyone to comment. You are babbling in avoidance.
Where was the name of the person you asked. Please quote. Am I a mind reader.
You don't answer questions do you. Maybe you don't want to.
3.)Only an idiot would claim because something has been done that justifies it or proves it valid. You going to answer the question or not?
They are until you can show what use they are to crime fighting. I see you neglected to do that. Do you just believe they are a good thing and have not thought this through? Your objection s noted can you back it up.
4.)Liar #216
It is neither a lie or strawman. YOU CLAIMED YOU SUPPORTED BACKGROUND CHECKS. Answer the question.
5.)Please show how a back ground check can determine what somebody will do in the future. You must have thought of that as it is only natural to ensure a law works as advertised. Do you have a figure for the accuracy of your tests or is it that you simple wish to deny specific groups of people like Jews, blacks, gays...
Please show why everybody should not be subjected to the same tests in case they commit a violent crime. Think of how much domestic violence could be prevented if this was applied to marriage or crime for vehicle ownership and driving, purchase of household utensils, gardening tools and other tools.
6.)Please show why denial of anyone the constitution gives a right to bear arms is not oppressive?
Answer the questions. Your claim or do you admit you have absolutely no idea why you support back ground checks, you just do. It seems like it does it not. You do know that means it is not your idea but an indoctrinated belief. Something every gun control advocate suffers from.
7.)I postulated that this was a belief you had, thank you so much for confirming you have given it no thought of your own and have been inculcated by gun control propaganda.
8.)You like all gun control advocates make asinine claims about others but never ever quote any proof of the claim. Why is that? Every line quoted was written by yourself. You have failed abysmally to show one single word somebody else wrote. You do know what that makes you.
Right down at the bottom of the list of avoidance of answering ploys is ridicule. It is a favourite of morally bankrupt gun control advocates exhibiting cognitive dissonance. You might bear that in mind next time you try it and ask yourself why am I avoiding answering the post.
1.) LMAO FACTUALLY wrong. i posted in post 17 to Josie, then YOU responded to me in post 215 that had nothing to do with my post. Try again
Facts prove i asked another poster about THEIR stance and asked nothing of you then you started rambling about the brady bill which had nothign to do with my question
2.) wrong again you quoted me, no avoidance, already posted the name and post number see above. Your false claim gets destroyed again
3.) justifies? you like straw man dont you. You asked for an example of it doing anything. One was given. ANother posted lie of yours totally destoryed
4.) Zero lies, nothign in 216 supports your posted lie.
in 215 YOU said "look how many gun owners support background checks AND registration, you think they object"
I said that i support background checks but I do object to whats going on and not want registration.
You claim faisl and gets destroyed again
5.) repeating this strawman wont make it work. never claimed background checks tell us what people do in the future:lamo Disagree? qoute me sayign that. You cant because i never did and this strawman fails and gets destroyed again.
6.) see#5
7.) yes you made up that strawman and using facts it was destroyed and proved wrong
8.) try again, everything i said is here for all to read and has nothgin to do with your false claims as facts just proved
That was awesome!!!1 what a display of total self ownage you just posted. Maybe actually read what people post next time so you can avoid this mistake and utter failure in the futures.
Your post fails and facts win again
opcorn2: