• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Data on gun control

Status
Not open for further replies.
Correlations cut

Where is the causal data.

You have just mocked correlations and here you are posting correlations and claiming it is proof. That is downright disingenuous and intellectual fraud.

Do you ever actually read the rubbish you post? It would seem not.
 
One sentence.

Babbling again?

And you post five links, none of which says what you claim.

They all show intent and that was all I had to show. Just becasue Obama has not made public statement in no way detracts from his INTENT.

Then you pretend gun control is all or nothing. Why don't you own any full auto weapons then?

Wise up. I did not pretend. I made a statement of FACT, anyone can read it. I stand by it.

Well if you think there are shades of grey to gun control tell me where gun control will stop. This aught to be good, I need a laugh.
 
Why do all your posts reflect your fear and nothing more as if you think they will mean something to others.

So let's play.

2.5 million citizens defended against crime with a gun.

Source Kleck, Gertz

Heart disease: 611,105
Cancer: 584,881
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 149,205
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 130,557
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,978
Alzheimer's disease: 84,767
Diabetes: 75,578
Influenza and Pneumonia: 56,979
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 47,112
Intentional self-harm (suicide): 41,149

Source CDC.

Do you see me scrambling in terror to defend the indefensible with irrelevant spam?
 
Babbling again?



They all show intent and that was all I had to show. Just becasue Obama has not made public statement in no way detracts from his INTENT.



Wise up. I did not pretend. I made a statement of FACT, anyone can read it. I stand by it.

Well if you think there are shades of grey to gun control tell me where gun control will stop. This aught to be good, I need a laugh.

It stopped at full auto weapons, for one.
 
Do you see me scrambling in terror to defend the indefensible with irrelevant spam?

I don't remember asking so why do you think I am interested?

It's what you get for posting crap.
 
I didn't realize my disapproval was so damning to how you feel. I am surprised you still post here:mrgreen:

I already said its illegal to be drunk and in possession of a firearm. that is a use restriction that has nothing to do with banning guns

Weren't you one of those that thought blind people should be allowed to be armed in case it breached their rights over there ? :doh
 
Weren't you one of those that thought blind people should be allowed to be armed in case it breached their rights over there ? :doh

You know there's a difference between totally blind and legally blind, right?
 
You know there's a difference between totally blind and legally blind, right?

I doubt it. The guy who broke the olympic qualifying standard at the 2012 Olympic games in ARCHERY was legally blind.
 
You know there's a difference between totally blind and legally blind, right?

Expand on that if you will as it will greatly illuminate your extremism . Do you really think blind people should be armed ? :shock:
 
Expand on that if you will as it will greatly illuminate your extremism . Do you really think blind people should be armed ? :shock:

8789162-16x9-940x529.jpg

Could someone who sees as well as the legally blind person be capable of defending themselves from an attacker in their home?
 
Expand on that if you will as it will greatly illuminate your extremism . Do you really think blind people should be armed ? :shock:

You don't think any honest private citizen should be armed so your argument is specious
 
Damn, I realized this thread is almost 4 years old. I guess Flogger felt need to raise it from the dead!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom