- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Some claim its about political subdivisions arming militias or people who join up having arms. that is nonsense. Why-because in Cruikshank v the US (1870s) the USSC noted that the 2A created NO rights but merely recognized a pre existing right that did not depend on the constitution for its existence.
It recognizes an inalienable natural right that exists without the presence of government. a militia is a creature of government.
It recognizes an inalienable natural right that exists without the presence of government. a militia is a creature of government.