• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chicago’s newly armed residents send murder rate plummeting

zsu2357 said:
Man if someone could answer that one. Of course those"weapons of war"that you can walk into any gun store or hell our Fred Meyer here and buy.
Click to expand...

one of the more silly arguments raised by a silly gun banner was that "weapons of war"should be banned but only weapons of war that banner cannot own and even if those firearms were never used by any established military. On the other hand, that banner claims to own both a handgun and a carbine that were actually issued-in the millions to our soldiers and he won't admit those should be banned. its a useless term because the K-bar fighting and utility knife, the Gerber Mark II combat knife and the Randall Model One combat knife were all extensively used by our military forces and have resulted in more enemy KIAs than those killed by the AR 15 or other civilian versions of military rifles in the hands of our military. So using the idiotic argument that weapons of war should be banned would mean hunting rifles built on the Mauser 98 or the Springfield A304 or even the old Winchester Lever action rifles would now be contraband as would be the Colt 1911 and the Smith and Wesson Model 10 revolver. and some modern machine guns would be fully legal since some have yet to be adopted by the military or used in "war"

its a stupid term dishonest gun banners use to try to inflame the slow witted masses who think "weapons of war" are like flamethrowers or phosphorous bombs or napalm
 
TurtleDude said:
remind me of your law degree? no one who has been on this board for more than a couple years doubts I have a law degree and professional level knowledge in this area. So you can pretend you know the issue but you have yet to prove to anyone who has legal training that you do.
Click to expand...
:shrug: However, the OP has not been proven.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom