This is a claim that requires some reasoning. You haven't provided anything of the sort. It's just a random guy on the internet making a claim.
And you refuse to acknowledge why real output growth fell in 2016. The only thing one could possibly gather from your statements is Obama did it. That's the crux of your analysis. It could possibly have anything to do with the decline in the deficit. There's no way a massive plunge in oil prices reduced aggregate output. When the Fed stopped easing credit markets, it couldn't have resulted in economic headwinds moving forward. Nope. It was Obama.
Unemployment is 2% higher than when he entered office.
First and foremost, a POTUS sets economic policy... the American people do the heavy lifting. Unemployment was 2% higher than when he entered office. Furthermore, he left office with current employment at October 2015 levels. Although Trump didn't cause the pandemic, his policies have led the U.S. to be the epicenter of COVID-19. You can try to deny whatever it is you want, it doesn't negate the fact that America failed to properly combat the virus. We're not alone... but that's certainly not an excuse for terrible performance.
It was 63% higher at the same time during the Obama administration. Only Obama was easily re-elected. Why do you chose to acknowledge stock market gains for Trump but are silent when it comes to Obama?
Jobs were growing no faster than they were during the Obama administration. This is a fact.
You choose to acknowledge these two points but ignore anything else.
Trend analysis is a valuable tool for understanding economic result. You have no reason to disregard the data other than it negates your premise. This entire argument of yours is complete and utter bullshit, and is easy to refute.
Unemployment was between 5.1% and 4.7% for 2016.
The stock market grew 147% during the Obama administration. You didn't know that, otherwise i wouldn't have had to point this out.