• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How big will this year's deficit be?

Yes he was and yet you cannot seem to grasp the reality that he is the ONLY PRESIDENT in history to get fewer votes for re-election than he got on his original election and his legacy was REJECTED.
its hilarious you think a twice popularly elected president had his legacy rejected. Lol.
your loyalty to Obama is cult like, lacking in data, logic, and common sense.
I, and others, have repeatedly pounded you over the head with the data, showing you are completely detached from reality.
Please point to the post where you told us how much Trump increased Obama's spending as I must have missed it and looking back I cannot find it.
United States Government Spending | 1950-2020 Data | 2021-2022 Forecast | Historical
 
its hilarious you think a twice popularly elected president had his legacy rejected. Lol.

I, and others, have repeatedly pounded you over the head with the data, showing you are completely detached from reality.

United States Government Spending | 1950-2020 Data | 2021-2022 Forecast | Historical

Election results tell a different story, your loyalty to Obama is cult like, He is out of office and his record is there for all to see and to be distorted by people like you. Not sure how old you are but actual context matters
 
One more time, you are wasting your time responding to anything that I post but it is your time that you are wasting. I see no further reason to respond to someone who lies about their lean and never answers direct questions. When you provide the link showing 20 million jobs created by Obama I will consider responding to you

Stop trying to change the subject. You said that obama losing the house in 2010 was a rejection of obama's presidency. So trump losing the house in 18 would be the same correct?
 
Election results tell a different story, your loyalty to Obama is cult like, He is out of office and his record is there for all to see and to be distorted by people like you.
yes, election results show your moronic statement of "rejecting obamas legacy" is not only demonstrably incorrect, but laughably moronic.
Not sure how old you are but actual context matters
data matters. I've crushed every argument you've made with it so far.
 
yes, election results show your moronic statement of "rejecting obamas legacy" is not only demonstrably incorrect, but laughably moronic.

data matters. I've crushed every argument you've made with it so far.

Yeah he includes 2012, a year where obama was reelected, republicans lost the senate and lessened their majority in the house as a victory for the GOP. :roll:
 
Yeah he includes 2012, a year where obama was reelected, republicans lost the senate and lessened their majority in the house as a victory for the GOP. :roll:

Republicans never had the Senate to lose in 2012, they took it in 2014. Nothing but partisan bull**** coming from you as usual. Your loyalty to Obama is staggering, out of touch with reality and cult like

Let me get this straight

Reagan's debt of 1.7 trillion dollars is worse than Obama's 9.3 trillion dollar because Reagan tripled the debt from what he inherited and Obama increased it from 10.6 trillion to 19.9 trillion? Doesn't matter that it was 50% of GDP when he left office. Do we pay debt service on the actual debt or the percentage change?

I know I am not going to get an honest response from you but will continue to post reality if there is anyone here really willing to debate the issues and not just post partisan ignorance
 
Republicans never had the Senate to lose in 2012, they took it in 2014. Nothing but partisan bull**** coming from you as usual. Your loyalty to Obama is staggering, out of touch with reality and cult like

Let me get this straight

Reagan's debt of 1.7 trillion dollars is worse than Obama's 9.3 trillion dollar because Reagan tripled the debt from what he inherited and Obama increased it from 10.6 trillion to 19.9 trillion? Doesn't matter that it was 50% of GDP when he left office. Do we pay debt service on the actual debt or the percentage change?

I know I am not going to get an honest response from you but will continue to post reality if there is anyone here really willing to debate the issues and not just post partisan ignorance

There's a thing called inflation but if you want to go with dollar amounts clinton only add $1.4 trillion. Are you ready to concede that clinton is better than reagan?
 
There's a thing called inflation but if you want to go with dollar amounts clinton only add $1.4 trillion. Are you ready to concede that clinton is better than reagan?

Right, inflation, forgot all about the high inflation rate in the 80's due to Carter economic policies and the double dip recession, thanks for reminding me of that

Your loyalty to the Democratic Party is cult like, Clinton, Bush, Obama are out of office and yet you still believe you are doing some good by propping up the Obama failures

Seems that data confuses you as it does with most Chicago political supporters, better focus on the murders and problems in Chicago before tackling the U.S. problems which will take care of themselves when Trump is re-elected and radical liberalism that you support is destroyed
 
Right, inflation, forgot all about the high inflation rate in the 80's due to Carter economic policies and the double dip recession, thanks for reminding me of that

Your loyalty to the Democratic Party is cult like, Clinton, Bush, Obama are out of office and yet you still believe you are doing some good by propping up the Obama failures

Seems that data confuses you as it does with most Chicago political supporters, better focus on the murders and problems in Chicago before tackling the U.S. problems which will take care of themselves when Trump is re-elected and radical liberalism that you support is destroyed

Looks like you dodge as usual. I will ask once more. Was clinton better than reagan with only $1.4 trillion added compared to reagains 1.86 trillion?
 
Looks like you dodge as usual. I will ask once more. Was clinton better than reagan with only $1.4 trillion added compared to reagains 1.86 trillion?

Of course he was in that liberal mind of yours none of which reconciles with reality. Reagan won re-election by winning 49 states, how many did Clinton win in his re-election Apparently the public didn't agree with you
 
Of course he was in that liberal mind of yours none of which reconciles with reality. Reagan won re-election by winning 49 states, how many did Clinton win in his re-election Apparently the public didn't agree with you
Was clinton better than reagan with only $1.4 trillion added compared to reagains 1.86 trillion?
 
Was clinton better than reagan with only $1.4 trillion added compared to reagains 1.86 trillion?

The public didn't agree with you as Reagan won 49 states how many did Clinton win? Also seems that debt really bothers you more than context. Reagan doubled GDP and created 17 million jobs coming off the worst recession since the Great Depression. How you coming on posting the link showing Obama creating 20 million jobs? All I can assume is that you lied about the 20 million without any evidence to support it
 
The public didn't agree with you as Reagan won 49 states how many did Clinton win? Also seems that debt really bothers you more than context. Reagan doubled GDP and created 17 million jobs coming off the worst recession since the Great Depression. How you coming on posting the link showing Obama creating 20 million jobs? All I can assume is that you lied about the 20 million without any evidence to support it

Was clinton better than reagan with only $1.4 trillion added compared to reagains 1.86 trillion?
 
Was clinton better than reagan with only $1.4 trillion added compared to reagains 1.86 trillion?

NOPE no recession for Clinton, double dip inherited by Reagan, the electorate got it, you never will
 
NOPE no recession for Clinton, double dip inherited by Reagan, the electorate got it, you never will

Got it. So you are a partisan hack and dont care about facts. That's why you think trumps 30 million jobs lost is better than obamas 20 million created.
 
Back
Top Bottom