- Joined
- May 12, 2014
- Messages
- 6,815
- Reaction score
- 4,420
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
That's not what you said, you said foreign debt, Foreign debt is defined as an outstanding loan or set of loans that one country owes to another country or institutions within that country. What you're talking about when Venezuela issued bonds in U.S. dollars is currency substitution. Which has been used by some countries to stop hyperinflation.
What I was talking about was debt owed in something other than one's own currency. You can always meet obligations in your own currency, if you are monetarily sovereign. That debt is not a problem. Venezuela (and a lot of other countries) got into trouble with foreign debt because you have no control over the relative prices of currencies. And that all stemmed from their giant drop in revenues due to the price of oil falling. Venezuela needs foreign currency to buy food and necessities, which their poorly diversified economy does not produce enough of. They did what they believed they had to do to feed their people.
Really Venezuela is a text book example, yes they had a problem with oil prices falling, but that didn't cause their hyperinflation, and yes they had other problems, but had they not just printed more money, there would not have been hyperinflation. There are MANY counties that have and had problem that didn't lead to hyperinflation, as the government contained their spending, thus keeping their money supply under control.
There is always an underlying economic problem. Countries don't just print up tons of money without a reason. It's usually a poor response, but it's still a response, not a cause. Not printing money would not have solved Venezuela's underlying economic problems, which were mainly due to the loss of foreign revenue from oil.
Here's the question I always ask of people who think that money printing is the root cause of hyperinflation: find me some examples of countries that spent their own currency into their domestic economies which resulted in hyperinflation. (Don't bother looking, you won't find any.) This is the question that relates to the U.S., because the U.S. creates money for the government to spend on domestic production. It is the question asked by the OP, at least at the federal level. And the answer is, as long as the economy can meet the increased demand (and they can), not only will there be no increase in normal inflation, the increased aggregate demand will be a boon for the economy.