• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pocahontas Warren's plan to spend America into peace, prosperity and happiness for all

I wonder if she still wears glass slippers because her daddy called her Cinderella.

I have no idea - not do I care. All I care about is her ability to beat Trump in 2020.

And it seems that what you care about also and what has you so afraid of her that you must say things like this to demean her.
 
No, my argument is that the government can't run out of money because money is not a limited resource. Where do you think dollars come from, anyway?

People that claim SS is "running out of money" are talking about the fact that SS taxes aren't keeping up with SS payments. It's as if you budgeted $100/month for electricity, and the bill was $120/month. Your electricity budget would "run out" of budgeted money before the year was up. That doesn't mean you couldn't still pay the bill if you chose to do so.

First you claim social security may be in trouble because taxes are lagging and next you claim the government cannot possibly run out of money for social security. If the government cannot run out of money for its expenses then why do we pay taxes at all? Why doesn't our government do better than the government of Kuwait and just make everybody filthy rich so nobody has to work again and nobody has to give money to the government in taxes? Why don't we tell the government to print its own money and keep its greedy hands off ours?
 
I get that the right wing fears her.

Shakin in our snakeskin cowboy boots we are. :roll: I imagine the left also thinks Trump is running scared from Pocahontas, but I don't believe it.
I imagine Trump wants to question Pocahontas in open debate not manipulated by leftists news donkeys like they handled Hillary's scripted interviews.
 
First you claim social security may be in trouble because taxes are lagging and next you claim the government cannot possibly run out of money for social security.

SS is not the government, it is merely a government program that operates within legal boundaries. Can you seriously not see that distinction?

The government is perfectly capable of changing those legal boundaries, and suddenly SS is not "broke" at all. The government can create whatever money it needs to pay for SS or any other obligation.

If the government cannot run out of money for its expenses then why do we pay taxes at all?

Now you're getting into economic questions that I don't think you would understand without me working way harder than I want to.

Why doesn't our government do better than the government of Kuwait and just make everybody filthy rich so nobody has to work again and nobody has to give money to the government in taxes? Let the government print its own money and keep its greedy hands off ours.

Again - I really think the answers to these questions would go right over your head.
 
I have no idea - not do I care. All I care about is her ability to beat Trump in 2020.

And it seems that what you care about also and what has you so afraid of her that you must say things like this to demean her.

I admit it is hard not to mock the all white privileged prevaricator claiming to be American Indian.
 
Yeah, money is a limited resource to you and me, because we don't create our own currency. Money is not something that the U.S. government has to collect in order to spend. Where do you think dollars come from, anyway?

Did Zimbabwe "run out" of their money? Apparently not.



Governments don't "earn" money. They also can't "save" in their own currencies. Governments create their own money. If they so choose, they can tax some or all of it back. But that is a choice, not a necessity.

The U.S. does not borrow other currencies, either. We operate in dollars, because we create all the dollars (via bonds and the central bank) that we need.



No, they don't "print money" to pay their obligations. They issue bonds to pay their obligations. It's the central bank that "prints money." And neither operation causes inflation.

If you print too much money, yes it will cause inflation.
Why doesn’t the government print enough money to pay off the 22 trillion debt?
 
If you print too much money, yes it will cause inflation.
Why doesn’t the government print enough money to pay off the 22 trillion debt?

Bond = U.S. govt. liability

Dollar/reserve = U.S. govt. liability

What do you think "paying off the debt" looks like in reality?
 
I don't care if leftists want to believe Trump is not rolling back bad regulations. However, they do damage to this nation by lying about it, even though it serves the purpose of dishonestly promoting the democrat party.

So you admit you lied about Obama.

Well done!
 
LOL
All presidents prior to 1913 did not present their taxes. The 16th amendment was ratified permanently legalizing an income tax.
Lincoln did briefly impose a tax to pay for the war and their was brief taxation in 1890’s.
So we can safely say prior to Wilson no president provided their income taxes. Dah.

The voluntary practice of providing income tax records was started by Richard Nixon.

Can someone help this guy get on the internet?

FDR and Truman did. You said none did. 1913 is quite irrelevant to your asinine claim.

IOW, you just trumpeted your own ignorance and are quite pleased with having done so.
 
Money is not something that the U.S. government has to collect in order to spend.

Don’t you pay taxes? Local, state and federal governments collect taxes which is money used for expenditures, roads, military, judges, politicians, border security, etc.
if the government does not collect enough in taxes, what will they do. Since the government is not financially responsible and don’t care how they spend our money, they have to borrow the money, they don’t arbitrarily print money.
 
Greece and Italy stupidly ceded their monetary sovereignty. The euro is designed so that countries have to borrow from the ECB. That's not the case with the U.S., U.K., Canada, Japan, Australia, etc.




Explain why any of that matters.



Wrong again.



People and countries buying U.S. bonds is not the same thing as the U.S. borrowing money.


What? LOL
What do you thing a bond is? You are loaning the government money. The government has to pay you back plus interest.
When the government cannot pay back these loans (bonds), people and other countries will not invest and the government can’t pay their debt.
Currently the only debt the government is paying is the interest on the 22 trillion.
 
Don’t you pay taxes? Local, state and federal governments collect taxes which is money used for expenditures, roads, military, judges, politicians, border security, etc.

State and local governments don't have the power to create their own money. They have to tax in order to spend. The federal government, on the other hand, does not need to tax in order to spend, and there are about 20 trillion pieces of evidence out there that support my argument and not yours.

if the government does not collect enough in taxes, what will they do. Since the government is not financially responsible and don’t care how they spend our money, they have to borrow the money, they don’t arbitrarily print money.

No, the government doesn't arbitrarily print money. They print money that they need to pay for the spending that Congress has decided on.

"Printing money," btw, is when the central bank buys bonds or other assets from the private sector in exchange for reserves and account balances. No net assets are created in the process, nobody is richer or poorer for the central bank's "printing." QE was an example of money printing, and it led to zero inflation.

When the government wants to deficit spend, Treasury issues bonds. The private sector buys those bonds. Then the government spends the proceeds right back into the economy. The net result is more bonds held by the private sector as rock-solid savings instruments, an increase in aggregate demand (from the government spending), and the same number of dollars in existence. The dollars have merely shifted from bond buyers to earners. No private sector assets are used, or even tied up, in the process.

If nobody buys the bonds, the central bank will, resulting in the Fed holding bonds while reserves and account balances increase (from the government spending) - and the government still gets their money to spend. It is nothing like true borrowing, and it is nothing like true debt, but that doesn't stop fear-mongering politicians from claiming the country has a debt problem, and/or we won't be able to borrow money in the future. Neither one is true.
 
Bond = U.S. govt. liability

Dollar/reserve = U.S. govt. liability

What do you think "paying off the debt" looks like in reality?
I find it amusing to watch you explain the concept of government bonds to others, while having an avatar of the biggest crook in Georgia. :lol:
 
It is a service to the rest of the site here when the first two words of the title disqualifies a thread from any serious consideration rendering the remainder of it unnecessary to read.

Obviously the OP is terrified of Warren, and the stench of his fear is just comedy gold.
 
War mongering? Which of these wars do you disapprove of?

Revolutionary War?
Spanish-American War?
Civil War?
WW1?
WW2?
Korean War?
Vietnam War?
Grenada?
Panama?
1st Gulf War?
Operation Desert Fox?
2nd Gulf War?
War in Afghanistan?
Libyan War?
Drug War?
War on Terror?

Pretty much everything after WW2
 
If you print too much money, yes it will cause inflation.
Why doesn’t the government print enough money to pay off the 22 trillion debt?

Other nations might get wind of it and blow a gasket? Can China just print more money for itself to buy American goods with and to pay its workers so they can sell their goods more cheaply than Americans can make them?
 
OK. In simple terms, you are completely wrong.

Do I really have to explain this again? Will it do any good?

When has a government EVER run out of money?

Anyone can print up pieces of paper. The question is whether anyone will value these pieces of paper.
 
The modern free sex and hell no we won't go 60s and beyond?

Most of it is just interventionism and much didn't turn out well.

So again, if we're going to go broke, we might as well get something for our troubles.
 
Other nations might get wind of it and blow a gasket? Can China just print more money for itself to buy American goods with and to pay its workers so they can sell their goods more cheaply than Americans can make them?

That is part of the problem.
They don’t want to buy American goods which is why they add additional fees and taxes to our exports and why they don’t open up their markets.
They keep their workers wages low and with the help of government subsidies can undercut anything we can manufacture.
 
That is part of the problem.
They don’t want to buy American goods which is why they add additional fees and taxes to our exports and why they don’t open up their markets.
They keep their workers wages low and with the help of government subsidies can undercut anything we can manufacture.

So they're giving us cheap goods for free? Why would we not want cheap stuff for free?
 
Marke is a Christian? :shock:

I don't know what he is but he sure talks a lot about god and the bible and all the justifiable punishment his god is going to hand out to sinners.
 
So they're giving us cheap goods for free? Why would we not want cheap stuff for free?

WTF are you talking about.
Why are Chinese products so much cheaper than the same American product?
 
Back
Top Bottom