• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's Inaugural Scam

Not sure if this link will work or not, so apologies if it does not. Rachel Maddown laid into the Trump Administration for releasing information today on his gross overspending on the inaugural. And this smells bad.

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6etqsp#tab_embed

Yep, and Trump had his base convinced that it was Hillary that was corrupt.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/15/...ee-paid-26-million-to-first-ladys-friend.html

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps...spent-nearly-107-million-on-events-1518722022

Trump inaugural committee paid millions to event planning company run by friend of first lady: report | TheHill

Once again, anything he accused Clinton of, he was guilty of 10-fold. What an amazing misdirection Trump managed to pull off on his un-savvy minions. Siegfried and Roy would be in awe.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if this link will work or not, so apologies if it does not. Rachel Maddown laid into the Trump Administration for releasing information today on his gross overspending on the inaugural. And this smells bad.

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6etqsp#tab_embed

I'm sorry, but I could only stand about 45 seconds of Maddow's voice before I had to turn it off. Do you have something that could be read? Preferably from a source that isn't Maddow.
 
I'm sorry, but I could only stand about 45 seconds of Maddow's voice before I had to turn it off. Do you have something that could be read? Preferably from a source that isn't Maddow.

No. Suffer if you are at all interested in the facts..What a bull**** answer on your part
 
I'm sorry, but I could only stand about 45 seconds of Maddow's voice before I had to turn it off. Do you have something that could be read? Preferably from a source that isn't Maddow.

Remember when she tried to break the news of Trumps tax returns, only to show that the man actually pays his taxes?

That is just one of a multitude of preverbal **** ups for her at this point.

This whole shtick is no different.
 
Yep, and Trump had his base convinced that it was Hillary that was corrupt.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/15/...ee-paid-26-million-to-first-ladys-friend.html

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps...spent-nearly-107-million-on-events-1518722022

Trump inaugural committee paid millions to event planning company run by friend of first lady: report | TheHill

Once again, anything he accused Clinton of, he was guilty of 10-fold. What an amazing misdirection Trump managed to pull off on his un-savvy minions. Siegfried and Roy would be in awe.

Ok, just saw this and read through them. So I'm guessing that the contention is both in the amount paid for the inauguration and where it was paid to? IE: Friends of the Trump family? As a summary is this correct?
 
No. Suffer if you are at all interested in the facts..What a bull**** answer on your part

Thanks but no thanks. upsideguy was kind enough to give sources that didn't rely on Maddow. A woman who has questionable history to say the least.
 
I'm sorry, but I could only stand about 45 seconds of Maddow's voice before I had to turn it off. Do you have something that could be read? Preferably from a source that isn't Maddow.

Don't like bearers of bad news? Then stop rooting for the wrong side. Maddow will not air anything that isn't vetted and always apologizes if she gets something wrong.
 
Don't like bearers of bad news? Then stop rooting for the wrong side. Maddow will not air anything that isn't vetted and always apologizes if she gets something wrong.

All while giving a major slanted spin.

As far as "bad news"...what exactly is the bad news here?
 
Ok, just saw this and read through them. So I'm guessing that the contention is both in the amount paid for the inauguration and where it was paid to? IE: Friends of the Trump family? As a summary is this correct?

Yes, the alleged corruption is paying $26M to a company that was started in December by a friend of Melania. Now, maybe this is legit, but corruption is usually about using a position of trust (a government position) to enrich yourself and your friends. Granted the inauguration isn't exactly "government", but its budget can be directed by government officials. The $26M is about 1/2 of the total amount raised by Obama for his event.

Granted this entity may have subcontracted much of the event so receiving such a huge amount might be explained, but its not an arm's length transaction. At first blush, this appears to be corruption. I will defer to a credible argument that it is all above-board. Until then, I remain skeptical.

This would be a big deal in a normal presidency, in this one, its but a silly side-show. Trump, however, is very good at side shows to keep people from looking at the main event.

Remember when she tried to break the news of Trumps tax returns, only to show that the man actually pays his taxes?

That is just one of a multitude of preverbal **** ups for her at this point.

This whole shtick is no different.


While I do appreciate that not everyone can stomach Rachel, which is why I found additional some cites to support the OP, Rachel is probably the most educated (Stanford, Rhodes Scholar and PhD from Oxford) and intelligent commentator/ analyst on TV.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Maddow

She does research her work and, as Iguanaman pointed out, she is quick to correct the record if she is ever wrong. That said, I will never use her or anything from MSNBC as a prime cite.
 
Last edited:
Yes, the alleged corruption is paying $26M to a company that was started in December by a friend of Melania. Now, maybe this is legit, but corruption is usually about using a position of trust (a government position) to enrich yourself and your friends. Granted the inauguration isn't exactly "government", but its budget can be directed by government officials. The $26M is about 1/2 of the total amount raised by Obama for his event.

Granted this entity may have subcontracted much of the event so receiving such a huge amount might be explained, but its not an arm's length transaction.

This would be a big deal in a normal presidency, in this one, its but a silly side-show. Trump, however, is very good at side shows to keep people from looking at the main event.

PS - while I do appreciate that not everyone can stomach Rachel, which is why I found some cites, she is probably the most educated (and intelligent) commentator/analyst on TV. She does research her work and, as TopCat pointed out, quick to correct the record if she is ever wrong.

The articles that you presented said that the company was started by Melania's long time friend "Stephanie Winston Wolkoff" and yet the document provided says that it was started by a "Richard J. Garzilla ESQ". Can you tell me why there is a discrepancy in the names there?

Also Obama's 2009 inauguration cost $170M. What Recession? The $170 Million Inauguration
 
The articles that you presented said that the company was started by Melania's long time friend "Stephanie Winston Wolkoff" and yet the document provided says that it was started by a "Richard J. Garzilla ESQ". Can you tell me why there is a discrepancy in the names there?

I am making an educated guess here (having incorporated several businesses over my career), but if the company began in December, Garzilla likely handled the incorporation as the incorporating agent (attorney) on behalf of Wolkoff. Often the corporation is initially registered in the name of the registration agent, sometimes to protect that actual ownership (or before stock is actually issued).

That is my operating assumption. I could be wrong, but its bedtime for me, so I will see what I can find out in the morning.

Professional Profiles - Law Offices of Richard J. Garzilli

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Winston_Wolkoff
 
I'm sorry, but I could only stand about 45 seconds of Maddow's voice before I had to turn it off. Do you have something that could be read? Preferably from a source that isn't Maddow.

25r30wi.gif
 
This is the same stupidity that has been on Rachel Maddow's mind since she got shown out for what she was, after the whole Trump tax mishap she had.

She really isn't doing herself any favors with this same crap, over and over again.
 
Not sure if this link will work or not, so apologies if it does not. Rachel Maddown laid into the Trump Administration for releasing information today on his gross overspending on the inaugural. And this smells bad.

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6etqsp#tab_embed

I stay away from the snark and sarc of Maddow, but I will say there is one video of her I've totally enjoyed.

 
The articles that you presented said that the company was started by Melania's long time friend "Stephanie Winston Wolkoff" and yet the document provided says that it was started by a "Richard J. Garzilla ESQ". Can you tell me why there is a discrepancy in the names there?

Also Obama's 2009 inauguration cost $170M. What Recession? The $170 Million Inauguration



I am making an educated guess here (having incorporated several businesses over my career), but if the company began in December, Garzilla likely handled the incorporation as the incorporating agent (attorney) on behalf of Wolkoff. Often the corporation is initially registered in the name of the registration agent, sometimes to protect that actual ownership (or before stock is actually issued).

That is my operating assumption. I could be wrong, but its bedtime for me, so I will see what I can find out in the morning.

Professional Profiles - Law Offices of Richard J. Garzilli

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Winston_Wolkoff

Yes, the tax return shows $25,803,509 paid to WIS Media Partners at 1049 Princeton Road, Marina del Ray (Los Angeles), CA.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4379460-The-Tax-Return-For-Donald-Trump-s-Inaugural.html

This is not far away from the law offices of Richard J. Garzilli.



The incorporation filing listed Garzilli "agent for service". This is typical for an attorney that throws a corporation to together quickly (notice it was incorporated in California in December 2016).

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4379699-The-Incorporation-Paper-for-WIS-Media-Partners.html

There is not a a lot of additional information on WIS Media Partners as they were a short-term entity (incorporated in December 2016 to run the January 2017 inauguration).

https://nypost.com/2018/02/15/trump-inaugural-committee-paid-melania-pals-firm-26m/
 
Last edited:
Don't like bearers of bad news? Then stop rooting for the wrong side. Maddow will not air anything that isn't vetted and always apologizes if she gets something wrong.

She's also the most polite commentator out there.
 
Don't like bearers of bad news?

No Maddows delivery is beyond annoying and makes her unwatchable. I actually like Chris Hayes and can even tolerate Matthews, but Maddow is unbearable.
 
No Maddows delivery is beyond annoying and makes her unwatchable. I actually like Chris Hayes and can even tolerate Matthews, but Maddow is unbearable.

Matthews??? He is a hack! "Did I tell you about my book about Bobby Kennedy?" He needs to collect his pension! Hayes is tolerable, but Maddow can turn five minutes of news into an hour of drama. Wasn't aware Stanford had a rate dram degree program! Does NBC get a cut of book sales if Matthews can shill his book on air?
 
The articles that you presented said that the company was started by Melania's long time friend "Stephanie Winston Wolkoff" and yet the document provided says that it was started by a "Richard J. Garzilla ESQ". Can you tell me why there is a discrepancy in the names there?

Also Obama's 2009 inauguration cost $170M. What Recession? The $170 Million Inauguration

Much of inauguration costs are picked up by the Federal and State governments...for security, ceremony, parade, etc. The costs being discussed here are those covered by the new president's fundraising for parties and celebrations. Obama raised less than 45 million for his celebrations and released all records in months. Trumps raised 107 million. He had far fewer balls, concerts, entertainments, anything than Obama yet managed to spend more than twice as much. Huge amounts were paid to family friends. The "audit" was not released. So it is quite a legitimate question ...where did the money go?
 
The Hargrove Company of Maryland (who has done every presidential inauguration since Harry Truman) was paid $25 million for their services. This is about normal for a presidential inauguration. However, a close friend of Melania Trump - Stephanie Wolkoff - started a company (WIS Media Partners) a month before the inauguration (12/2016) to assist Hargrove. WIS was paid $26 million, and Ms. Wolkoff skimmed off $1.6 million for herself. The Inauguration Committee donated $5 million to charity.

The Inauguration Committee initially had $107 million (nearly twice as much as any other inauguration) in Inauguration donations. By my ciphering, 25+26+5=56. 107-56=$51 million in Inauguration money unaccounted for. In addition, although Ms. Wolkoff lives in New York, she visits the White House about once a month. She has a security "Blue Badge" which allows her access to the entire West Wing. Trump aides cannot understand how/why Ms. Wolkoff obtained the coveted Blue Badge. No one on the Trump Inauguration Committee is accounting for the missing $51 million dollars.
 
The Hargrove Company of Maryland (who has done every presidential inauguration since Harry Truman) was paid $25 million for their services. This is about normal for a presidential inauguration. However, a close friend of Melania Trump - Stephanie Wolkoff - started a company (WIS Media Partners) a month before the inauguration (12/2016) to assist Hargrove. WIS was paid $26 million, and Ms. Wolkoff skimmed off $1.6 million for herself. The Inauguration Committee donated $5 million to charity.

The Inauguration Committee initially had $107 million (nearly twice as much as any other inauguration) in Inauguration donations. By my ciphering, 25+26+5=56. 107-56=$51 million in Inauguration money unaccounted for. In addition, although Ms. Wolkoff lives in New York, she visits the White House about once a month. She has a security "Blue Badge" which allows her access to the entire West Wing. Trump aides cannot understand how/why Ms. Wolkoff obtained the coveted Blue Badge. No one on the Trump Inauguration Committee is accounting for the missing $51 million dollars.

Trouble in paradise?



https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0L...ser.html/RK=2/RS=skq_TP.XNKoBYDxgjsgCVMXp.9I-


Who in the Trump orbit will manage to profit from the Armistice/Veterans Day Parade?
 
Back
Top Bottom