• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's Tax Promises Undercut by CEO Plans to Help Investors

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,329
Reaction score
82,720
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Trump's Tax Promises Undercut by CEO Plans to Help Investors


By Toluse Olorunnipa
Bloomberg
November 29, 2017

Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say they’ll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trump’s promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class. The president has held fast to his pledge even as top executives’ comments have run counter to it for months. Instead of hiring more workers or raising their pay, many companies say they’ll first increase dividends or buy back their own shares. The White House released a paper last month predicting that cutting the corporate tax rate to 20 percent would would increase average household income by $4,000 to $9,000. Other economists have questioned that claim. But CEOs more often tout the benefits of the legislation for shareholders. Corporations are most likely to pay down debt and repurchase shares with the proceeds from a “tax holiday,” according to Shin’s Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Research survey of companies, conducted in July. Only 35 percent of companies said they would use the money for capital expenditures.

Share buybacks are a way for companies to reward investors using spare cash. They tend to have the effect of raising share prices and appearing to increase a firm’s earnings per share by reducing the number of shares in circulation. But there is also outright opposition by some corporate leaders, who cite concerns including increased economic inequality and the bill’s impact on the national debt. Starbucks Corp. Chairman Howard Schultz, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chairman and CEO Warren Buffett and BlackRock Financial Management Inc. Chairman and CEO Larry Fink have all publicly criticized the legislation. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Chairman and CEO Lloyd Blankfein said this month that with the economy at nearly full employment and growing at 3 percent, now isn’t the best time for tax cuts. And John Bogle, founder of Vanguard Group, said Tuesday that the Republican tax plan is a “moral abomination” in part because companies will hand over the proceeds to shareholders. “One of the flaws is that corporations are putting their shareholders ahead of the people that built the corporation,” he said at an event in New York sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations.

Even corporation CEOs are saying that the Trump/GOP trickle-down-economic-growth-tax-stimulus is based on a false premise ... production expansion and increased employment/higher wages.

Related: Robot automation will 'take 800 million jobs by 2030' - report
 
When even Goldman Sachs allows that "now isn't the best time for tax cuts", you know we're doing something wrong.

:lol:
 
Trump's Tax Promises Undercut by CEO Plans to Help Investors




Even corporation CEOs are saying that the Trump/GOP trickle-down-economic-growth-tax-stimulus is based on a false premise ... production expansion and increased employment/higher wages.

Related: Robot automation will 'take 800 million jobs by 2030' - report

The main failure here is that Trump has always had too much faith that giving those he considers to be the builders like himself a windfall would be put to use by the builders to help America.

America is way too corrupt for that now, but Trump is too ignorant to see this, or shall we say he wears rose colored glasses.

If this tax bill becomes law I am going to be pissed.
 
Trump's Tax Promises Undercut by CEO Plans to Help Investors




Even corporation CEOs are saying that the Trump/GOP trickle-down-economic-growth-tax-stimulus is based on a false premise ... production expansion and increased employment/higher wages.

Related: Robot automation will 'take 800 million jobs by 2030' - report

Why does it undercut the more jobs goal? The cash will go to insurance policies, funds or high net individuals. This means most will be reinvested. Where is the problem?
 
Why does it undercut the more jobs goal? The cash will go to insurance policies, funds or high net individuals. This means most will be reinvested. Where is the problem?

Trump/GOP doesn't need paper reinvestment's. They need a sustained annual economic-growth of better than 4% every year for the next decade.

Only ~35% of CEOs surveyed said they intend to parlay their corporate tax bonanza into capital improvements.

That won't get you 4%+ growth for a decade.
 
Trump/GOP doesn't need paper reinvestment's. They need a sustained annual economic-growth of better than 4% every year for the next decade.

Only ~35% of CEOs surveyed said they intend to parlay their corporate tax bonanza into capital improvements.

That won't get you 4%+ growth for a decade.

At the moment growth is headed that way, in fact. I am not as optimistic for its sustainability without stark reductions in social redistribution and the system by which it is done. But for the moment market and business folks are making the happy sounds of those that achieved their budget goals and are looking at fine bonuses.
 
At the moment growth is headed that way, in fact.

In fact, the Trump/GOP tax scheme cannot generate enough economic growth to pay for itself. That would require 5-6% sustained growth/decade. Putting aside economics for a minute, such sustained growth isn't even possible using a demographic metric. The US now has a negative population replacement value. Not enough babies being born to counter Baby-Boomer deaths. In addition, 10,000 Baby-Boomers are retiring every day and this will continue for the next 19 years. Trump intends to curtail immigration. Unemployment (September 2017 is at 4.2%. Trump promised 25 million new jobs during his term. Lol. That would be the most new jobs created under any president, and those without today's automation and robotics. The longest sustained US economic growth (+8%) were the 6 years of WWII.

There are not enough indigenous worker drones available to sustain economic-growth of 5-6% over a decade. Plus, the Trump tax cuts will almost certainly result in a recession. Do the napkin math.
 
Well maybe if they got taxed more, then they'd grow and create more jobs.
 
In fact, the Trump/GOP tax scheme cannot generate enough economic growth to pay for itself. That would require 5-6% sustained growth/decade. Putting aside economics for a minute, such sustained growth isn't even possible using a demographic metric. The US now has a negative population replacement value. Not enough babies being born to counter Baby-Boomer deaths. In addition, 10,000 Baby-Boomers are retiring every day and this will continue for the next 19 years. Trump intends to curtail immigration. Unemployment (September 2017 is at 4.2%. Trump promised 25 million new jobs during his term. Lol. That would be the most new jobs created under any president, and those without today's automation and robotics. The longest sustained US economic growth (+8%) were the 6 years of WWII.

There are not enough indigenous worker drones available to sustain economic-growth of 5-6% over a decade. Plus, the Trump tax cuts will almost certainly result in a recession. Do the napkin math.

The only point you make well is that we should increase selective immigration of persons we need. Allowing unselctive entry is foolish.
 
Back
Top Bottom