• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tax Reform Could Open Up a Huge Loophole for the Wealthy

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,171
Reaction score
82,448
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Tax Reform Could Open Up a Huge Loophole for the Wealthy


A perk meant for business owners may help a wide variety of affluent Americans cut their tax bills....

By Ben Steverman
September 29, 2017

In the emergency room, there’s a good chance your doctor isn’t an employee of the hospital. She might be an independent contractor and, for tax purposes, the owner of a small business whose sole purpose is to sell her services as a physician. That’s one example of a “pass-through business,” now a hot topic in the U.S. tax reform debate. Everything from a giant real estate business to a corner liquor store can be a pass-through, so called because it doesn’t pay taxes itself but instead passes profits on to the owner, who pays taxes based on his or her own individual rate. Now, everybody else might want to get in on the act, or at least think about it if they’re in a higher tax bracket. The tax reform framework released this week by President Donald Trump and congressional leaders offers a lucrative treat to pass-through business owners. A key provision would cap the federal rate for many pass-through businesses at 25 percent, a huge tax cut if owners are now taxed at the maximum individual rate of 39.6 percent.In fact, of the 26 million businesses in the U.S. in 2014, according to the Brookings Institution, 95 percent paid taxes on a pass-through basis. Unless a company is large or its ownership is complex, a pass-through is usually the simplest and lowest-tax option. Actors, architects, factories, and football teams can all structure themselves as pass-through entities.

Under current law, there’s rarely a huge financial advantage for salaried workers to set up a pass-through structure to capture their income. For that emergency room doctor, for example, a pass-through can make it easier to deduct expenses and can offer some protection from legal liability, depending on the state. The tax savings are relatively small, mainly from skipping some payroll taxes, and might not even cover the cost of hiring a lawyer and accountant to create the more complex business structure. But a drop in the marginal tax rate from 39.6 percent to 25 percent changes the economics, said Anjali Jariwala, a CPA and financial adviser who specializes in doctors at FIT Advisors, of Redondo Beach, Ca. “This is really going to be impactful for high-income earners, especially if they’re dual income,” she said.

Is a custom homebuilder providing a service (his architectural expertise) or a product (a house)? An emergency room doctor might be providing a service, but what about a couple of doctors running an extensive chain of clinics? Their personal labor is a small contribution to their business’s income compared to the millions of dollars they’ve invested in equipment and the hiring and training of employees. No matter how the law is written, wealthy taxpayers will try to pay the lower pass-through rate on as much income as possible. “If they leave a big enough loophole, the accountants are going to be out there taking advantage of it,” said Michael Allmon, a CPA at Michael B. Allmon & Associates LLP in Manhattan Beach, Ca. “If there’s a way to do it, we’ll figure it out.”

Under this schema, virtually anyone with a significant income can incorporate, declare themselves pass-through entities, and save 14+ percent on taxes.
 
Tax Reform Could Open Up a Huge Loophole for the Wealthy


A perk meant for business owners may help a wide variety of affluent Americans cut their tax bills....



Under this schema, virtually anyone with a significant income can incorporate, declare themselves pass-through entities, and save 14+ percent on taxes.

That transition from salaried employee to independent contractor or LLC pass through subcontractor ignores some other factors such as payroll taxes which go from 7.65% to 15.3%, having employer provided fringe benefits (vacation, sick leave and retirement matching) and the need to get individual vs. group insurance coverage.

We can rest assured that congress critters will make the tax reform deal much better for those that contribute to their re-election campaigns (offer bribes?) than those which do not.
 
That transition from salaried employee to independent contractor or LLC pass through subcontractor ignores some other factors such as payroll taxes which go from 7.65% to 15.3%, having employer provided fringe benefits (vacation, sick leave and retirement matching) and the need to get individual vs. group insurance coverage.

We can rest assured that congress critters will make the tax reform deal much better for those that contribute to their re-election campaigns (offer bribes?) than those which do not.

The issue is that all those businesses are already LLCs or S Corps or partnerships, and the income of those entities is reported on their 1040 on Sched E, sole proprietors on Sch C. The default rule as proposed is if it's a "business" and that would include LLCs, partnerships, S Corps and sole proprietors, it faces a maximum tax rate of 25%. For those EXISTING businesses, the rules can't make it so that a LLC owner gets taxed at a max of 25% on his salary equivalent while one of his employees faces a top rate of 35% on his actual salary. So they promise rules that we all assume would require LLC etc. owners to designate a part of the profits as salary equivalent and taxed at the top rate, and only "business" or non-salary income taxed at the lower rate.

Obviously those getting paid a salary today and in the upper brackets can form an LLC and get their employer to pay them 'consulting' fees or as an independent contractor. You're right that won't work for some people for the reasons you suggest, but for someone making big money, it will be a huge incentive to convert salary to "business income."

So they'll have to write anti-abuse regs to prevent that, but it will be a big mess. LLC owners will try to claim low "salaries" from their businesses, and IRS will want to claim high salaries, and we'll get a lot of audits, more court cases, etc.

From where I sit, it seems pretty stupid. I wouldn't really have a problem, or would have less of a problem, if those folks formed a C Corp and got lower tax rates for money retained in the corp, and when it's distributed as salary or dividends, subject to ordinary income tax.
 
The issue is that all those businesses are already LLCs or S Corps or partnerships, and the income of those entities is reported on their 1040 on Sched E, sole proprietors on Sch C. The default rule as proposed is if it's a "business" and that would include LLCs, partnerships, S Corps and sole proprietors, it faces a maximum tax rate of 25%. For those EXISTING businesses, the rules can't make it so that a LLC owner gets taxed at a max of 25% on his salary equivalent while one of his employees faces a top rate of 35% on his actual salary. So they promise rules that we all assume would require LLC etc. owners to designate a part of the profits as salary equivalent and taxed at the top rate, and only "business" or non-salary income taxed at the lower rate.

Obviously those getting paid a salary today and in the upper brackets can form an LLC and get their employer to pay them 'consulting' fees or as an independent contractor. You're right that won't work for some people for the reasons you suggest, but for someone making big money, it will be a huge incentive to convert salary to "business income."

So they'll have to write anti-abuse regs to prevent that, but it will be a big mess. LLC owners will try to claim low "salaries" from their businesses, and IRS will want to claim high salaries, and we'll get a lot of audits, more court cases, etc.

From where I sit, it seems pretty stupid. I wouldn't really have a problem, or would have less of a problem, if those folks formed a C Corp and got lower tax rates for money retained in the corp, and when it's distributed as salary or dividends, subject to ordinary income tax.

So long as the solution remains very complex, employs many lawyers & bureaucrats and has sufficient wiggle room (deductions, credits and exemptions) to protect the major campaign donors it will be given the stamp of approval by congress critters.
 
Tax Reform Could Open Up a Huge Loophole for the Wealthy


A perk meant for business owners may help a wide variety of affluent Americans cut their tax bills....



Under this schema, virtually anyone with a significant income can incorporate, declare themselves pass-through entities, and save 14+ percent on taxes.

It is exactly what happened here in Kansas and in exchange we actually lagged our peer states in economic growth. Personally, I think the Democrats need to come off this argument that the Trump / Republican Tax plan is a tax break for the rich. Everyone knows that. The biggest problem with it is that its not a pro-growth plan outside of any corporate tax reforms. The income tax cuts they are proposing will do little to nothing to grow the economy, and that is what Democrats need to be talking about.
 
Last edited:
ALL businesses should be pass through. Let the stock holder or the business owner pay the tax at their individual rate. The mistake Brownback made in Kansas is that all those pass through businesses were owned out of state, or stock holders out of state, so he just lost money. But set it up properly and it's the way to go.
 
Back
Top Bottom