• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Right and Left Share Deficit Blame

Jack Hays

Traveler
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
94,823
Reaction score
28,342
Location
Williamsburg, Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
On our persistent deficits there's enough blame for everyone. This article tells the story clearly.

The ‘progressives’ are to blame, too, for mismanaging our government


The Republicans-as-villains story is a half-truth.






What has been missing in Washington for the past two or three decades is a serious debate about the role of the federal government. What programs are effective and justified? Who deserves government benefits, and how much? The issue is not whether we’ll have big government or small government. To flip what President Bill Clinton once said: The era of small government is over. Actually, it was over many decades ago. The real issue is whether we’ll have effective big government or mismanaged big government.
So far, mismanaged is winning. As I have written countless times, the semi-automatic expansion of programs for the elderly (mainly Social Security, Medicare and long-term care under Medicaid) is slowly crowding out many other government programs, from defense to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The paradoxical result is that government spending will grow larger even while it grows less effective.
The conventional wisdom in Washington is that the Republicans are responsible for this mess. Their fixation with sizable tax cuts leaves government perpetually dependent on massive borrowing. There is much truth to this. We cannot afford large tax cuts. Just the opposite: We need tax increases, slowly introduced, to cover government’s existing deficit, roughly $700 billion in the current fiscal year.
Still, the Republicans-as-villains story is a half-truth. The other half is the refusal of Democrats — “liberals” and “progressives” — to cut almost any Social Security and Medicare benefits. They’re essentially off-limits, even though life expectancy has increased and many elderly are well-off. Plausible cuts need not be draconian. Extending the eligibility age for full Social Security benefits by a year would reduce spending by 7 percent. . . .







 
Sure didn't hear that over the last 8 years.
 
On our persistent deficits there's enough blame for everyone. This article tells the story clearly.

The ‘progressives’ are to blame, too, for mismanaging our government


The Republicans-as-villains story is a half-truth.






What has been missing in Washington for the past two or three decades is a serious debate about the role of the federal government. What programs are effective and justified? Who deserves government benefits, and how much? The issue is not whether we’ll have big government or small government. To flip what President Bill Clinton once said: The era of small government is over. Actually, it was over many decades ago. The real issue is whether we’ll have effective big government or mismanaged big government.
So far, mismanaged is winning. As I have written countless times, the semi-automatic expansion of programs for the elderly (mainly Social Security, Medicare and long-term care under Medicaid) is slowly crowding out many other government programs, from defense to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The paradoxical result is that government spending will grow larger even while it grows less effective.
The conventional wisdom in Washington is that the Republicans are responsible for this mess. Their fixation with sizable tax cuts leaves government perpetually dependent on massive borrowing. There is much truth to this. We cannot afford large tax cuts. Just the opposite: We need tax increases, slowly introduced, to cover government’s existing deficit, roughly $700 billion in the current fiscal year.
Still, the Republicans-as-villains story is a half-truth. The other half is the refusal of Democrats — “liberals” and “progressives” — to cut almost any Social Security and Medicare benefits. They’re essentially off-limits, even though life expectancy has increased and many elderly are well-off. Plausible cuts need not be draconian. Extending the eligibility age for full Social Security benefits by a year would reduce spending by 7 percent. . . .








A deficit might have been sensible during the Cold War and in periodic recessions briefly. What happens, when in a booming economy we run money and fiscal policies like drunk sailors, we saw in the bubbles following Clinton.
 
“liberals” and “progressives” — to cut almost any Social Security and Medicare benefits. They’re essentially off-limits, even though life expectancy has increased and many elderly are well-off. Plausible cuts need not be draconian. Extending the eligibility age for full Social Security benefits by a year would reduce spending by 7 percent. . . .

Actually IIRC 4-5 years ago there was talk of trying to fix SS and Medicare, 1 of the fixes was to raise the eligibility age, even AARP was onboard with that. Also a small raise in taxes on SS.

RAISE TAXES you say!!! Guess who shot that down?
 
What do you think "sequestration" was all about?

A political circus, a waste of time, a folly pursued for no reason other than to bamboozle the public. Raising the debt ceiling and resuming baseline budgeting renders the whole exercise moot.
 
A political circus, a waste of time, a folly pursued for no reason other than to bamboozle the public. Raising the debt ceiling and resuming baseline budgeting renders the whole exercise moot.

This Country wasted a decade, of Abundant Building Material, willing and able Human Resources, at the lowest interest rates and Labor Cost in Decades. All to prevent One Man from a Win.

So I say, congratulations on the Win ... and this Country Still Needs it's Infrastructure Fixed.

I watched on the History Channel yesterday, about Great Trains. Japan has had High Speed Trains since 1964 ... ALL MY LIFE. We have Amtrack :roll:

Amtrak has been around since 1970 and hasn't changed since. :roll:
 
This Country wasted a decade, of Abundant Building Material, willing and able Human Resources, at the lowest interest rates and Labor Cost in Decades. All to prevent One Man from a Win.

So I say, congratulations on the Win ... and this Country Still Needs it's Infrastructure Fixed.

I watched on the History Channel yesterday, about Great Trains. Japan has had High Speed Trains since 1964 ... ALL MY LIFE. We have Amtrack :roll:

Amtrak has been around since 1970 and hasn't changed since. :roll:

So it wasn't really about preventing Obama from winning if we've had a train gap since 1970.
 
So it wasn't really about preventing Obama from winning if we've had a train gap since 1970.

This isn't Rocket Science or even Long Division.

If you have a Business and a Business NEED!

... and you can pick the Best in Labor, at the Bast Labor Cost.
... the latest Building Material at a reduced cost and the lowest interest rates.

Why would you not act?

Infrastructure REQUIRES Maintenance ... even a silly as Wall will require maintaining.

... it's like your Roof is leaking, and you're worried about going into debt. :roll:
 
This isn't Rocket Science or even Long Division.

If you have a Business and a Business NEED!

... and you can pick the Best in Labor, at the Bast Labor Cost.
... the latest Building Material at a reduced cost and the lowest interest rates.

Why would you not act?

Infrastructure REQUIRES Maintenance ... even a silly as Wall will require maintaining.

... it's like your Roof is leaking, and you're worried about going into debt. :roll:

And this has what to do with the deficit?
 
And this has what to do with the deficit?

The Smart PRIORITIZE Debt ...

If your house if falling apart around you, where would you prioritize your asset?

Buy more Guns to put in the House?
 
On our persistent deficits there's enough blame for everyone. This article tells the story clearly.

The ‘progressives’ are to blame, too, for mismanaging our government


The Republicans-as-villains story is a half-truth.






What has been missing in Washington for the past two or three decades is a serious debate about the role of the federal government. What programs are effective and justified? Who deserves government benefits, and how much? The issue is not whether we’ll have big government or small government. To flip what President Bill Clinton once said: The era of small government is over. Actually, it was over many decades ago. The real issue is whether we’ll have effective big government or mismanaged big government.
So far, mismanaged is winning. As I have written countless times, the semi-automatic expansion of programs for the elderly (mainly Social Security, Medicare and long-term care under Medicaid) is slowly crowding out many other government programs, from defense to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The paradoxical result is that government spending will grow larger even while it grows less effective.
The conventional wisdom in Washington is that the Republicans are responsible for this mess. Their fixation with sizable tax cuts leaves government perpetually dependent on massive borrowing. There is much truth to this. We cannot afford large tax cuts. Just the opposite: We need tax increases, slowly introduced, to cover government’s existing deficit, roughly $700 billion in the current fiscal year.
Still, the Republicans-as-villains story is a half-truth. The other half is the refusal of Democrats — “liberals” and “progressives” — to cut almost any Social Security and Medicare benefits. They’re essentially off-limits, even though life expectancy has increased and many elderly are well-off. Plausible cuts need not be draconian. Extending the eligibility age for full Social Security benefits by a year would reduce spending by 7 percent. . . .








Not the least of which is SSI disability which became a permanent welfare program for the unemployed after the 2008 crash. Now most of those people have aged into eligibility. You can also work here in the USA on a green card for your 40 quarters, and receive an SS check in your home country, which is fine if SS wasn't upside down and paying over and above the amount the green card worker paid in, but today we are deficit financing their SS check in wherever.

And lastly, part of the problem is the "boomer" generation politicians are hoping will hurry up and die off and solve the problem for them.

And regarding taxes and tax cuts: Every dollar of tax revenue comes from the private sector, so every dollar you take from them is a dollar they can't use thus making them a dollar poorer. We rely on a robust and healty private sector to pay the bills.

The solution is to move SS eligibility age out, and increase the employees contribution rate.
 
I new where this was going ... :lol:

After the last two Hurricanes, I'm betting there will be a flood (no pun intended), of welfare request from Texas and Florida. ;)
 
A political circus, a waste of time, a folly pursued for no reason other than to bamboozle the public. Raising the debt ceiling and resuming baseline budgeting renders the whole exercise moot.

You don't really what to know.

Regardless, the topic was taken up during the last eight years.
 
A political circus, a waste of time, a folly pursued for no reason other than to bamboozle the public. Raising the debt ceiling and resuming baseline budgeting renders the whole exercise moot.

Not the least of which is SSI disability which became a permanent welfare program for the unemployed after the 2008 crash. Now most of those people have aged into eligibility. You can also work here in the USA on a green card for your 40 quarters, and receive an SS check in your home country, which is fine if SS wasn't upside down and paying over and above the amount the green card worker paid in, but today we are deficit financing their SS check in wherever.

And lastly, part of the problem is the "boomer" generation politicians are hoping will hurry up and die off and solve the problem for them.

And regarding taxes and tax cuts: Every dollar of tax revenue comes from the private sector, so every dollar you take from them is a dollar they can't use thus making them a dollar poorer. We rely on a robust and healty private sector to pay the bills.

The solution is to move SS eligibility age out, and increase the employees contribution rate.

Speaking as a boomer, I trust you'll understand if I say I'm in no hurry.:mrgreen:
 

Just happy talk to paper over the fact that our sailors don't get enough steaming time to be proficient and about half our aircraft can't fly.

[h=3]Sequestration | Congressional Budget Office[/h]https://www.cbo.gov/topics/budget/sequestration



Sequestration refers to automatic spending cuts that occur through the withdrawal of funding for certain (but not all) government programs. CBO provides ...
 
Back
Top Bottom