Moot
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2006
- Messages
- 40,549
- Reaction score
- 15,452
- Location
- Utah
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
So I see. lolActually the entity who disagrees with Comey on Mens Rea is 18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information:
...(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed...
I made two of those words kinda more noticeable than the others - can you tell us what they are, Moot?
Now look at the big red words that you grossly and negligently chose to ignore. The law requires that 'National defense' has to have been harmed or injured by the gross negligence and in Hillary's case, harm to the national defense that was never proven...or even addressed. So what if she had unmarked classified emails....a) she had the authority to classify or declassify anything she wanted, b) she didn't send or receive emails from anyone she didn't know or trust,...and c) none of her work related emails were "willfully", "knowingly", or "intentionally" lost, stolen, abstracted or destroyed. AND...since she didn't break any NARA or State Department rules or regulations regarding emails making it extremely difficult to prove that she was "grossly negligent," at all.