• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do The Wealthy Even Pay Taxes?

I have heard recently that Trump wants to give the wealthy the largest tax breaks in history. On a side note, at the same time, cutting food stamps and making it harder for the poor to get medical coverage. I am wondering if the whole taxing the wealthy thing is just a scam to begin with. For example, when I paid taxes on my wages, I got most of it back in tax returns. Does the same thing apply for the wealthy?

Also, the tax laws are written by and for the wealthy. They can afford tax lawyers to find them any of what are probably a zillion loopholes. Another thing is that there are banks all over the planet where the wealthy can anonymously deposit money. Making it untaxable. Also, look at any year in say the past 40 years. For whatever year you choose, look and see what companies for that year paid no taxes at all. The wealthy are against welfare. But apparently corporate welfare is ok. The U.S. needs to just take over all companies. And cut out the overpaid tax griping dead weight middlemen. They also need to remove the rights of personhood from corporations.

Another thing is that back in the 60's, the average salary for a company executive was about 25 times what the average worker made. Today, it is around 250 times that. At one point not all that long ago, it got closer to being 400 times what the average worker made. And the wealthy are griping on how much in taxes they pay?! B!!!S!!! As it is, they have so much money it must be difficult for them to spend it!
Read post 2 again if still confused, another point you seem confused on is corp, business, etc do not pay taxes they pass it on to the consumer. ( it's what I do always!!! In my business) how do you give someone a tax break??? They earned that money!!!!! The ones getting the gift is the non earners... Wise up...

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
 
Because the 91% or the 1% don't pay 90%. So I would be lying.

What if what you said wasn't a lie. What if it was just wrong. As I said to someone else, unless you are wealthy, you really have no idea what the wealthy pay in taxes. Also, those who tell you what the wealthy pay in taxes are most likely the wealthy. Can you really be that much of a sucker?
 
What if what you said wasn't a lie. What if it was just wrong. As I said to someone else, unless you are wealthy, you really have no idea what the wealthy pay in taxes. Also, those who tell you what the wealthy pay in taxes are most likely the wealthy. Can you really be that much of a sucker?

The numbers are available. From the IRS among others.

Unlike your bar graph, for which there appears to be no source. Or at least no source posted.
 
What if what you said wasn't a lie. What if it was just wrong. As I said to someone else, unless you are wealthy, you really have no idea what the wealthy pay in taxes. Also, those who tell you what the wealthy pay in taxes are most likely the wealthy. Can you really be that much of a sucker?
So the poor fund the country? By definition poor is not having money.

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
 
I have heard recently that Trump wants to give the wealthy the largest tax breaks in history. On a side note, at the same time, cutting food stamps and making it harder for the poor to get medical coverage. I am wondering if the whole taxing the wealthy thing is just a scam to begin with. For example, when I paid taxes on my wages, I got most of it back in tax returns. Does the same thing apply for the wealthy?

Also, the tax laws are written by and for the wealthy. They can afford tax lawyers to find them any of what are probably a zillion loopholes. Another thing is that there are banks all over the planet where the wealthy can anonymously deposit money. Making it untaxable. Also, look at any year in say the past 40 years. For whatever year you choose, look and see what companies for that year paid no taxes at all. The wealthy are against welfare. But apparently corporate welfare is ok. The U.S. needs to just take over all companies. And cut out the overpaid tax griping dead weight middlemen. They also need to remove the rights of personhood from corporations.

Another thing is that back in the 60's, the average salary for a company executive was about 25 times what the average worker made. Today, it is around 250 times that. At one point not all that long ago, it got closer to being 400 times what the average worker made. And the wealthy are griping on how much in taxes they pay?! B!!!S!!! As it is, they have so much money it must be difficult for them to spend it!

Nope, they dont pay a dime in taxes. All local, State and Federal revenues come from the poor and Trump wants to raise their taxes even higher than they already are.
 
Nope, they dont pay a dime in taxes. All local, State and Federal revenues come from the poor and Trump wants to raise their taxes even higher than they already are.

I think the OP is no longer able to respond
 
Nope, they dont pay a dime in taxes. All local, State and Federal revenues come from the poor and Trump wants to raise their taxes even higher than they already are.
Everyone know where the money is, hint its not the bank. Its the poor of course.... Cheers

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
 
I have heard recently that Trump wants to give the wealthy the largest tax breaks in history. On a side note, at the same time, cutting food stamps and making it harder for the poor to get medical coverage. I am wondering if the whole taxing the wealthy thing is just a scam to begin with. For example, when I paid taxes on my wages, I got most of it back in tax returns. Does the same thing apply for the wealthy?

Also, the tax laws are written by and for the wealthy. They can afford tax lawyers to find them any of what are probably a zillion loopholes. Another thing is that there are banks all over the planet where the wealthy can anonymously deposit money. Making it untaxable. Also, look at any year in say the past 40 years. For whatever year you choose, look and see what companies for that year paid no taxes at all. The wealthy are against welfare. But apparently corporate welfare is ok. The U.S. needs to just take over all companies. And cut out the overpaid tax griping dead weight middlemen. They also need to remove the rights of personhood from corporations.

Another thing is that back in the 60's, the average salary for a company executive was about 25 times what the average worker made. Today, it is around 250 times that. At one point not all that long ago, it got closer to being 400 times what the average worker made. And the wealthy are griping on how much in taxes they pay?! B!!!S!!! As it is, they have so much money it must be difficult for them to spend it!

The "wealthy" pay taxes on economic gains just like you do, weather it be on a 1099, or a W2, or something else. There are write offs due to investment losses that are available to all investors.

I'm not sure where class envy and tax policy intersect, except to say my company bought us partners new cars every year, and paid the taxes on them, thus they could probably write off these taxes as an operating expense.

Don't think republicans are the only ones against rewriting the tax code. It's not called "The Book of Favors" for nothing!
 
I think the OP is no longer able to respond

I think the op does not care about what the wealthy actually pay. They just want to keep the class warfare narrative. They still think it works for them. If they cared about actual tax revenue from the wealthy, they should be all for tax cuts as the wealthy end up actually paying more in taxes, based on more earnings.
 
The top 1% pays more than 40% of the entire federal tax burden. So, what a stupid question. :roll:

You might try like, you know, looking stuff up. ;)
The top 1% also have the lion's share of income.

What is interesting is that Obamacare did a great deal to address income inequality.

According to the IRS, our nation’s top earners paid an average effective federal income tax rate of 23.13% on AGI averaging $318 million in 2014 (the most current year studied). That’s an increase over their effective tax rate of 16.72% on average AGI of $336 million in 2012. Remember, though, that in 2012 the highest tax rate for long term capital gains was just 15%. In 2013, that rate jumped to 23.8% for many taxpayers, thanks to a 20% top rate on long-term capital gains and the additional 3.8% Medicare surcharge imposed by Obamacare.
link
 
The top 1% also have the lion's share of income.

What is interesting is that Obamacare did a great deal to address income inequality.
So!!! What do think there is only so many slices to the pie and when they are gone nothing is left?? I started with nothing and am now a " 2 percenter" maybe I will make 1 percent, time will tell. Your line of thinking is what holds you down period. The sad fact the majority of poor are poor because of their own poor choices and no amount of stealing from one group and giving to another will ever fix that!

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
 
So!!! What do think there is only so many slices to the pie and when they are gone nothing is left?? I started with nothing and am now a " 2 percenter" maybe I will make 1 percent, time will tell. Your line of thinking is what holds you down period. The sad fact the majority of poor are poor because of their own poor choices and no amount of stealing from one group and giving to another will ever fix that!
Just for info, I am in the top 1%. Blaming the poor for being poor, huh? We've heard that for generations. The difference between rich liberals and rich conservatives is that rich liberals don't mind being taxed a little more for the overall good of the country.

The whole idea that the majority of poor are poor because of their own poor choices has no empirical support. The best available research done by ( An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Anti-Poverty Programs in the United States ) show that the programs conservatives most wants to slash, Medicaid and food stamps, don’t even have large negative effects on work effort.

But the whole idea that allowing people no help, subjects them to starvation and homelessness, creates an incentive to work is just an excuse for selfishness. Throughout most of human history the poor were left to starve and die in the streets and it didn't provide them the incentive to lift themselves out of poverty. Yet, conservatives contend the poor are worse off with government help and it's all their damn fault -- so we don't need to do anything.

This meme is thrust upon Americans to swallow which happens to serve the interests of the wealthy conservatives that benefit from those policies. Modern conservatism uses the smoke-screen of self-reliance, individualism and character to mask policies which are self-serving, bigoted and cruel. The cadre of conservative billionaires don't want to pay higher taxes that will be used to help "those people." Thus, they invent a myth that the best way to help the poor is to NOT provide them any help at all. This way, according to them, their misery will give the poor the incentive to become educated and industrious. As I said earlier, this has never worked in all of human history.

Their objective is to keep taxes on the rich low and keep government out of their hair. But these people's numbers are small, so they need to fund propaganda groups like the Heritage Foundation to create false data and spread the message to middle-class conservatives, who are generally stupid enough to swallow their lies. Thus the pro-life conservative-leaning worker who listens to Rush Limbaugh will repeatedly vote for the party that is less likely to protect his safety, less likely to protect his job, and less likely to benefit him economically.
 
Just for info, I am in the top 1%. Blaming the poor for being poor, huh? We've heard that for generations. The difference between rich liberals and rich conservatives is that rich liberals don't mind being taxed a little more for the overall good of the country.

The whole idea that the majority of poor are poor because of their own poor choices has no empirical support. The best available research done by ( An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Anti-Poverty Programs in the United States ) show that the programs conservatives most wants to slash, Medicaid and food stamps, don’t even have large negative effects on work effort.

But the whole idea that allowing people no help, subjects them to starvation and homelessness, creates an incentive to work is just an excuse for selfishness. Throughout most of human history the poor were left to starve and die in the streets and it didn't provide them the incentive to lift themselves out of poverty. Yet, conservatives contend the poor are worse off with government help and it's all their damn fault -- so we don't need to do anything.

This meme is thrust upon Americans to swallow which happens to serve the interests of the wealthy conservatives that benefit from those policies. Modern conservatism uses the smoke-screen of self-reliance, individualism and character to mask policies which are self-serving, bigoted and cruel. The cadre of conservative billionaires don't want to pay higher taxes that will be used to help "those people." Thus, they invent a myth that the best way to help the poor is to NOT provide them any help at all. This way, according to them, their misery will give the poor the incentive to become educated and industrious. As I said earlier, this has never worked in all of human history.

Their objective is to keep taxes on the rich low and keep government out of their hair. But these people's numbers are small, so they need to fund propaganda groups like the Heritage Foundation to create false data and spread the message to middle-class conservatives, who are generally stupid enough to swallow their lies. Thus the pro-life conservative-leaning worker who listens to Rush Limbaugh will repeatedly vote for the party that is less likely to protect his safety, less likely to protect his job, and less likely to benefit him economically.

in other words, you want class warfare

the fact is you want the middle class to become dependent on the democrat party to keep them in power
 
in other words, you want class warfare

the fact is you want the middle class to become dependent on the democrat party to keep them in power
We already have class warfare. We used to have relatively low income inequality, with high taxes on wealth and laws that encourage labor. Over the last few decades the rich have waged war to lower their taxes and undermining labor, resulting in inequality worse than the 1920s. It always seems to be that when the masses object to the policies that the rich bought and paid for, the rich scream CLASS WARFARE!

While you use talking points like "dependency" I see Democratic elected officials trying to pass laws that help people have better lives.
 
We already have class warfare. We used to have relatively low income inequality, with high taxes on wealth and laws that encourage labor. Over the last few decades the rich have waged war to lower their taxes and undermining labor, resulting in inequality worse than the 1920s. It always seems to be that when the masses object to the policies that the rich bought and paid for, the rich scream CLASS WARFARE!

While you use talking points like "dependency" I see Democratic elected officials trying to pass laws that help people have better lives.
as long as investments make one money, the frugal and intelligent rich will keep getting richer and richer. what is your solution? more and more taxation until people who are wealthy cannot increase their wealth? why should my property be forfeited so you can pretend you have done something to make you feel better? your existence does nothing for those who you want to tax more
 
The top 1% pays more than 40% of the entire federal tax burden. So, what a stupid question. :roll:

You might try like, you know, looking stuff up. ;)

You might listen to your own advice..... its more like a little less than 30%

Jeb Bush says top 1 percent pay nearly half of all taxes | PolitiFact Florida

The OP has a very valid point. The healthcare bill is a ruse. It has little to do with healthcare. It is really a wealth transfer from those that need the help to those that don't need the money.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/22/...y-part-of-the-senate-health-bill.html?mcubz=1
 
Just for info, I am in the top 1%. Blaming the poor for being poor, huh? We've heard that for generations. The difference between rich liberals and rich conservatives is that rich liberals don't mind being taxed a little more for the overall good of the country.

The whole idea that the majority of poor are poor because of their own poor choices has no empirical support. The best available research done by ( An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Anti-Poverty Programs in the United States ) show that the programs conservatives most wants to slash, Medicaid and food stamps, don’t even have large negative effects on work effort.

According to research by the Brookings institute, if you follow 3 simple rules: Graduate High school, Get a Job, Wait until 21 to get married and have kids, you will reach middle class. Only 2% American adults that followed that plan remained in poverty.
 
According to research by the Brookings institute, if you follow 3 simple rules: Graduate High school, Get a Job, Wait until 21 to get married and have kids, you will reach middle class. Only 2% American adults that followed that plan remained in poverty.

Cool, so we can transfer more wealth to the top as we have been over the past half century and no societal issues will arise.
 
Cool, so we can transfer more wealth to the top as we have been over the past half century and no societal issues will arise.

My personal opinion is that we should not be transferring wealth between any group. My post was in response to the quote about being poor due to poor choices.

Outside of the disabled and elderly, I am pretty much for social Darwinism.
 
Just for info, I am in the top 1%. Blaming the poor for being poor, huh? We've heard that for generations. The difference between rich liberals and rich conservatives is that rich liberals don't mind being taxed a little more for the overall good of the country.

The whole idea that the majority of poor are poor because of their own poor choices has no empirical support. The best available research done by ( An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Anti-Poverty Programs in the United States ) show that the programs conservatives most wants to slash, Medicaid and food stamps, don’t even have large negative effects on work effort.

But the whole idea that allowing people no help, subjects them to starvation and homelessness, creates an incentive to work is just an excuse for selfishness. Throughout most of human history the poor were left to starve and die in the streets and it didn't provide them the incentive to lift themselves out of poverty. Yet, conservatives contend the poor are worse off with government help and it's all their damn fault -- so we don't need to do anything.

This meme is thrust upon Americans to swallow which happens to serve the interests of the wealthy conservatives that benefit from those policies. Modern conservatism uses the smoke-screen of self-reliance, individualism and character to mask policies which are self-serving, bigoted and cruel. The cadre of conservative billionaires don't want to pay higher taxes that will be used to help "those people." Thus, they invent a myth that the best way to help the poor is to NOT provide them any help at all. This way, according to them, their misery will give the poor the incentive to become educated and industrious. As I said earlier, this has never worked in all of human history.

Their objective is to keep taxes on the rich low and keep government out of their hair. But these people's numbers are small, so they need to fund propaganda groups like the Heritage Foundation to create false data and spread the message to middle-class conservatives, who are generally stupid enough to swallow their lies. Thus the pro-life conservative-leaning worker who listens to Rush Limbaugh will repeatedly vote for the party that is less likely to protect his safety, less likely to protect his job, and less likely to benefit him economically.

Blah,blah,blah... Simple question, you said rich liberals don't mind being taxed a little more, define little more? Percentage please? Very simple question!

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
We already have class warfare. We used to have relatively low income inequality, with high taxes on wealth and laws that encourage labor. Over the last few decades the rich have waged war to lower their taxes and undermining labor, resulting in inequality worse than the 1920s. It always seems to be that when the masses object to the policies that the rich bought and paid for, the rich scream CLASS WARFARE!

While you use talking points like "dependency" I see Democratic elected officials trying to pass laws that help people have better lives.
Yea...... And the masses always bite the hand that feeds them ! Lmao! Really? Stealing from one group and giving to another doesn't buy votes? You would argue that republicans pass laws to benefit the rich( money they earned by the way) but it doesn't work in reverse? I do believe one lives in a fantasy world..

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
 
So!!! What do think there is only so many slices to the pie and when they are gone nothing is left?? I started with nothing and am now a " 2 percenter" maybe I will make 1 percent, time will tell. Your line of thinking is what holds you down period. The sad fact the majority of poor are poor because of their own poor choices and no amount of stealing from one group and giving to another will ever fix that!

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk

It, however, will placate them which in and of itself is a benefit to the wealthy.
 
It, however, will placate them which in and of itself is a benefit to the wealthy.
No it won't! Human nature always demands more wether you work for it or steal from others. The beauty of capitalism is the more you work( smart that is,wise choices) the more you keep. It goes sideways always when those that don't work as hard or are not as smart demand from those that have more and at some point it always ends badly...

Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom