- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
- Messages
- 160,900
- Reaction score
- 57,844
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Wrong as usual.
Yes, you are wrong as usual.
Wrong as usual.
No, that would be you and your ridiculous claim.Yes, you are wrong as usual.
But they aren't.
No, that would be you and your ridiculous claim.
If you wish to dispute the truth of my statement you are going to have to prove yours was correct.
So here it is.
Actually, it's people like you who pushed for this. So, yeah, it is about you.
Not only is it indisputable that this topic is not about me, but ...
Please prove that people like me pushed for Trump to remove 3% of the meals on wheels budget.
I am more than sure you can not.
So good luck proving your false claim. :rofl
So you can't "prove" your claim. Figures.Pretty much everything we see and hear from the Trump administration is like a replay of Fox News and Rush Limbaugh's radio show. So, yes. I blame the people who eat and breathe that garbage for what is happening in Washington today.
For a lot of lower income working families, the $250/yr or so that they save from free school lunch may make the difference in whether they can afford to take their kid to the doctor or not, or whether they can get their car fixed, or whether they can keep the electricity on.
I personally think that school lunch should be free for all students.
But they aren't.
Then why force me to support our military by taking part of my earnings?
Making America Great Again by reliving many of its worst hours.It's a sorry bunch who'd deprive children and the elderly, disabled and veteran community a meal.
What the **** is essential in increasing a military that already dwarfs all the militaries of America's potential enemies combined? That is not essential...that is stupid.
So, are you saying that services that could actually save American lives are less important than padding an already ridiculously over padded military budget?
Yes or no.
And please save the song and dance (as so many people seem to give)...JUST YES OR NO.
Why the deflection? That's a different issue all together.
I guess you have no valid retort.
I just read that Trump's budget proposals will eliminate grants to Meals on Wheels--serves the underserved and seniors who have nowhere else to go. It costs taxpayers 3m each week-end when Trump and his family leave the WH to their FL estate. That same amount of money will fund Meals on Wheels for an entire year. Trump followers listening?
Meals and wheels is a good program but it is not an appropriate role for government.
We need to stop the liberals attempts to have the government take over charities.
Then why force me to support our military by taking part of my earnings?
Why not.
If we need a larger military, then why not make donations to it optional. Those who desire it can fund it. If individual funding of the military was optional, I wonder how much funding it would receive.
Oh, is THAT the argument community service organizations like the various programs collectively called "Meals on Wheels" are saying, that they don't want block grants because of a fear of a "guberment take-over"?It's all about power and control. The more they control the better.
Irrelevant nonsense.[video=youtube;wagnilBp0hg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wagnilBp0hg[video]
Irrelevant nonsense.
:dohProve it. :lamoIrrelevant nonsense.[video=youtube;wagnilBp0hg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wagnilBp0hg[video]So you can't "prove" your claim. Figures.
Let's all hope SOMEbody begins to control spending.It's all about power and control. The more they control the better.
Oh, is THAT the argument community service organizations like the various programs collectively called "Meals on Wheels" are saying, that they don't want block grants because of a fear of a "guberment take-over"?
I think your libertarian projecting has gone way too far.