• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What makes people think cuts in government spending boost the economy?

They weren't worthless — they were liberals.

if so then our Founders were liberals who wanted very very tiny govt!! In what way is that liberal? isn't thinking fun?
 
our Founders were liberals who wanted very very tiny govt

The Constitution established a powerful central gubmint.

>>isn't thinking fun?

You should try it sometime.
 
and if I did, then what?? Are you going to admit liberalism killed 120 million in the last century and become a conservative?

Proof matters to logical people but not to liberals in the least. This is the very nature of liberalism according to conservative intellectuals.
Yet here we are, 10 exchanges after your original comment, and you still have posted no proof that welfare rolls were cut in half after the workfare requirement.

Sent from my SM-G360V using Tapatalk
 
if conservative intellectuals are morons please give a reason to believe so, or admit with your silence or attempts to change the subject that you are a liberal. Thanks
So your silence on posting proof of your claims means you're really a liberal. Got it.

Sent from my SM-G360V using Tapatalk
 
you still have posted no proof that welfare rolls were cut in half after the workfare requirement.

why post logical proof to liberals when liberals are emotion oriented and not thought or reason oriented? If you see the proof you will ignore it.

Democracy was supposed to be intelligent folks deciding stuff, not the intelligent trying to make the ignorant think when they are not incapable of such..
 
The Constitution established a powerful central gubmint.
.

if so why did it have only a few carefully enumerated powers?????


67)James Madison in Federalist paper NO. 45: "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce."
 
if so why did it have only a few carefully enumerated powers?

Why would federal power need to be widespread to be critically important? Can states secede? No. Can they legally enact statutes that are inconsistent with federal law? No. So if yer a citizen of a state, yer subject to federal control whether you like it or not. Yer option is to take it or get the eff out.
 
Why would federal power need to be widespread to be critically important?.

who said it needed to be widespread to be critically important. Do you have any idea what your subject is?
 
Why would federal power need to be widespread to be critically important? Can states secede? No. Can they legally enact statutes that are inconsistent with federal law? No. So if yer a citizen of a state, yer subject to federal control whether you like it or not. Yer option is to take it or get the eff out.

what is your subject??
 
I think you should dial 911 and ask for transport to a hospital. You may be having a stroke.

You said our Founders were liberals. Isn't learning fun? Why not enjoy it?
 
if so why did it have only a few carefully enumerated powers?????


67)James Madison in Federalist paper NO. 45: "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce."

Of course that fell apart when education, income redistribution and insurance were added. It appears that when the power to "tax income from all sources" was added then those funds can be spent on darned near anything - rendering the original enumeration of federal powers moot.
 
Of course that fell apart when education, income redistribution and insurance were added. It appears that when the power to "tax income from all sources" was added then those funds can be spent on darned near anything - rendering the original enumeration of federal powers moot.

yes liberals subverted our Constitution and then, still not happy, they spied for Stalin and elected Obama despite 3 communist parents.
 
yes liberals subverted our Constitution and then, still not happy, they spied for Stalin and elected Obama despite 3 communist parents.

Eisenhower was a liberal? It was he that created a cabinet department called HEW in 1953. That federal superpower granted to the POTUS to add federal powers disappeared in 1962 yet left the federal HEW powers intact to later grow like a weed.

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Health,_Education,_and_Welfare
 
Back
Top Bottom