- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 57,470
- Reaction score
- 14,587
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
On the point of "no such things as to big to fail." this is incorrect, although not directly related to the thread.
Dodd-Frank has only created larger banks all of which are 'too bog to fail', as the cost of regulatory compliance has driven smaller banks to unprofitably and acquisition by larger banks.
ObamaCare has a bailout clause in the law which will have the government pay money to insurance companies that don't make enough profit from Obamacare.
So I don't see where your assertion that 'no such things as to big to fail.' is correct.
If you run a bad business then you are expected to fail. someone else comes along and takes your place. I do not agree with the to big to fail mentality.
there is a reason that we set anti-trust laws.
I do not agree with "to big to fail" if you are "to big to fail" then there is a problem with the economy and regulation. chevy should have been allowed to fail.
someone else would have come in bought them up and done it better, just like hostess.
they failed someone else came in and bought them up and is doing it better.