• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Healthcare profiteering - rip off in plain sight.

By now the high overall cost of health care in the United States is broadly recognized. And many Americans are acutely aware of how much they pay for their own care. Those without health insurance face sky-high doctor and hospital bills and ever more aggressive collection tactics—when they receive care at all.

Those who are fortunate enough to have insurance experience steep annual premium hikes along with rising deductibles and co-pays, and, all too often, a well-founded fear of losing their coverage should they lose a job or have a serious illness in the family.

Still, Americans may well underestimate the degree to which they subsidize the current U.S. health care system out of their own pockets. And almost no one recognizes that even people without health insurance pay substantial sums into the system today.

If more people understood the full size of the health care bill that they as individuals are already paying—and for a system that provides seriously inadequate care to millions of Americans—then the corporate opponents of a universal single-payer system might find it far more difficult to frighten the public about the costs of that system.

In other words, to recognize the advantages of a single-payer system, we have to understand how the United States funds health care and health research and how much it actually costs us today.
How much is the sick U.S. health care system costing you?

Could WE say paying more and getting less?

The problem is.. you also have to understand how single payer systems work.. which its obvious that they proponents of single payer in America do not understand.
 
Moreover, tax dollars also pay for critical elements of the health care system apart from direct care—Medicare funds much of the expensive equipment hospitals use, for instance, along with all medical residencies.

And what do you think the response to a cut in those funds will be from the medical system?
 
If America switched to Universal Health care the biggest hit would not be the medical field but the Insurance companies and the investors of Insurance companies..
Which just might free up more money to average Americans as well as companies and factories, after all if they don't have to have insurance as a benefit to the workers , perhaps the workers might get a raise.:peace
 
And what do you think the response to a cut in those funds will be from the medical system?

It is why we need to insist on equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States, so market participants can more fully engage our markets and market based economy.
 
If America switched to Universal Health care the biggest hit would not be the medical field but the Insurance companies and the investors of Insurance companies..
Which just might free up more money to average Americans as well as companies and factories, after all if they don't have to have insurance as a benefit to the workers , perhaps the workers might get a raise.:peace

Actually if we switched to UNIVERSAL healthcare.. the big boon would be the insurance companies.

There is a difference between universal healthcare and single payer.

I always get a laugh at the "we might get a raise"..

Companies have been making buttloads of greater profits for more than two or three decades but wages are stagnant..

And you think that if employers have the government paying their healthcare premiums.. that companies will magnanimously start giving out bonuses and won't simply pocket the profits.
 
Actually if we switched to UNIVERSAL healthcare.. the big boon would be the insurance companies.

There is a difference between universal healthcare and single payer.

I always get a laugh at the "we might get a raise"..

Companies have been making buttloads of greater profits for more than two or three decades but wages are stagnant..

And you think that if employers have the government paying their healthcare premiums.. that companies will magnanimously start giving out bonuses and won't simply pocket the profits.

I didn't say that, I said it would free up the jobs to get a raise.
I worked 30 yrs in Michigan at one assembly line or another you don't have to tel me about the Companies #1 priority PROFITS.
Hell everybody knows that.
But sometimes having one priority is not enough, for if they only look at profits they may take other things for granted , like the all important CUSTOMER.
When the outsourcing of jobs began they were warned by many especially workers.
I think they actually believed that old patriotic saying "be patriotic buy American" needless to say that saying and a lot of customers left with the jobs.
Foreign products began outselling American products almost immediately .
Example; the bailout of 2008 which cost American taxpayers "many of whom lost their job to outsourcing" 740 million dollars.

So now they want to bring back the jobs to America, but the CEOS don't seem that interested.
I think they're waiting for the next stimulus package they may take the money but customers will not return to American products anytime soon.
Not without more jobs from American products , not foreign made but American made.

As for health care check out how many doctors in America come from someplace else, ever wonder WHY?
Because America does not have universal health care , an average doctor from a country that has Universal Healthcare gets paid a set price , coming to America to them is like joining a gold rush except they're not looking for gold they're looking for sick people and America has a lot of those.
Do you know how much money America from the government to average taxpayer spends on Healthcare including those insurance payments and premiums. I'll let you look that up and compare to any nation that has Universal Healthcare.:peace:
 
I didn't say that, I said it would free up the jobs to get a raise.
I worked 30 yrs in Michigan at one assembly line or another you don't have to tel me about the Companies #1 priority PROFITS.
Hell everybody knows that.
But sometimes having one priority is not enough, for if they only look at profits they may take other things for granted , like the all important CUSTOMER.
When the outsourcing of jobs began they were warned by many especially workers.
I think they actually believed that old patriotic saying "be patriotic buy American" needless to say that saying and a lot of customers left with the jobs.
Foreign products began outselling American products almost immediately .
Example; the bailout of 2008 which cost American taxpayers "many of whom lost their job to outsourcing" 740 million dollars.

So now they want to bring back the jobs to America, but the CEOS don't seem that interested.
I think they're waiting for the next stimulus package they may take the money but customers will not return to American products anytime soon.
Not without more jobs from American products , not foreign made but American made.

As for health care check out how many doctors in America come from someplace else, ever wonder WHY?
Because America does not have universal health care , an average doctor from a country that has Universal Healthcare gets paid a set price , coming to America to them is like joining a gold rush except they're not looking for gold they're looking for sick people and America has a lot of those.
Do you know how much money America from the government to average taxpayer spends on Healthcare including those insurance payments and premiums. I'll let you look that up and compare to any nation that has Universal Healthcare.:peace:

Well.. first you have to decide whether you are talking about universal healthcare.. or single payer healthcare because they aren;t the same thing.

However.. yes.. if you look at what is spent on healthcare including insurance payments and premiums its less than in most other countries.

Then again.. if you look at what WAGES are in those other countries.. you understand why they pay less. Their costs are less.

Which is why by the way.. corporations have fled the US to these other countries were wages are cheaper. Except healthcare can;t flee. So.. in the US.. we pay our medical folks a lot more in general than any other country. and that props up the wages for all the workers in the area. Healthcare in this country is one of the top if not the top source of new jobs. :peace
 
Well.. first you have to decide whether you are talking about universal healthcare.. or single payer healthcare because they aren;t the same thing.

However.. yes.. if you look at what is spent on healthcare including insurance payments and premiums its less than in most other countries.

Then again.. if you look at what WAGES are in those other countries.. you understand why they pay less. Their costs are less.

Which is why by the way.. corporations have fled the US to these other countries were wages are cheaper. Except healthcare can;t flee. So.. in the US.. we pay our medical folks a lot more in general than any other country. and that props up the wages for all the workers in the area. Healthcare in this country is one of the top if not the top source of new jobs. :peace
lol, no. Single payer healthcare systems provide better care than ours, and at a fraction of our cost.
 
lol, no. Single payer healthcare systems provide better care than ours, and at a fraction of our cost.

Great.. then please give me a rationale to my US patients.. who have US medicaid and US medicare..

Why they should want to switch to Canadian single payer.. that does not cover their outpatient medications..outpatient therapies, home health, and durable medical goods

When their current US medicare and US medicaid DO cover those things....

Please explain it to them.. lets hear your rationale. Please explain how they will have better care.. without coverage for outpatient therapies, home health, and outpatient medications.

Lets hear it.
 
Great.. then please give me a rationale to my US patients.. who have US medicaid and US medicare..
huh? they already have single payer.

Why they should want to switch to Canadian single payer.. that does not cover their outpatient medications..outpatient therapies, home health, and durable medical goods

When their current US medicare and US medicaid DO cover those things....

Please explain it to them.. lets hear your rationale. Please explain how they will have better care.. without coverage for outpatient therapies, home health, and outpatient medications.

Lets hear it.
been over this already, and provided you a peer reviewed paper showing single payer systems provide better care at a fraction of the cost of ours. this is empirical reality.
 
Faithful execution of at-will employment laws in our at-will employment States can solve simple poverty by solving for the deleterious effect of capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on Labor.

That form of full employment of capital resources can only render our economy more efficient.
 
Let's ask landlords what the minimum wage and unemployment compensation wage should be. Once people can afford housing they can look to better market based solutions for other issues.
 
huh? they already have single payer.


been over this already, and provided you a peer reviewed paper showing single payer systems provide better care at a fraction of the cost of ours. this is empirical reality.

No.. the US doesn;t have single payer. and according to you.. Countries like Canada have better care because they have single payer.

So again.. please give the rationale.. be free to include your peer reviewed paper.. to my Medicaid and MEdicare patients.. why they will be better off with Canadian government insurance.. which covers far less than their current Medicare and Medicaid.

It should be easy.. why you have this peer reviewed paper that concludes (according to you).. that my patients should be better off with Canadian medicare.. than their current insurance which covers more.

So make your case.
 
No.. the US doesn;t have single payer. and according to you.. Countries like Canada have better care because they have single payer.
medicare/Medicaid is single payer.

So again.. please give the rationale.. be free to include your peer reviewed paper.. to my Medicaid and MEdicare patients.. why they will be better off with Canadian government insurance.. which covers far less than their current Medicare and Medicaid.
I don't need to.
It should be easy.. why you have this peer reviewed paper that concludes (according to you).. that my patients should be better off with Canadian medicare.. than their current insurance which covers more.

So make your case.
already have. The paper clearly shows single payer systems provide better care than we do, at a fraction of the cost. this is empirical fact.
 
medicare/Medicaid is single payer.


.
Um no.. first.. medicare and medicaid are very distinctly DIFFERENT insurances..

And the US doesn't have single payer.

already have. The paper clearly shows single payer systems provide better care than we do, at a fraction of the cost. this is empirical fact.

I see.. but that really doesn;t explain why its better for my patients with Medicare.. or Medicaid.. to want to switch to something like Canadian Single payer which covers a lot less.

So please explain your rationale...

Do you contend that my patients really don;t NEED the services.. like home health, and outpatient medication, and outpatient physical therapy services.. that medicare and medicaid provides.. and therefore Canadian government type single payer will be fine?

Please explain exactly why they should switch.
 
Um no.. first.. medicare and medicaid are very distinctly DIFFERENT insurances..
they are both single payer.

And the US doesn't have single payer.
medicare and Medicaid are single payer.


I see.. but that really doesn;t explain why its better for my patients with Medicare.. or Medicaid.. to want to switch to something like Canadian Single payer which covers a lot less.
strawman
So please explain your rationale...
asked and answered.
Do you contend that my patients really don;t NEED the services.. like home health, and outpatient medication, and outpatient physical therapy services.. that medicare and medicaid provides.. and therefore Canadian government type single payer will be fine?

Please explain exactly why they should switch.
strawman. they already have single payer. We will just be expanding the current single payer system in the US to cover everyone. Then we can enjoy what the rest of the first world nations do. Better healthcare than we get now, at a fraction of the cost.
 
they are both single payer.


medicare and Medicaid are single payer.

t.

Yeah.. no they are not "both single payer"..

how can they be "single payer"... when.. they are two different insurances?

By all accounts then.. the US then has single payer. Is that what you are now contending.

Look man.. you can't have a logical discussion when you don;t even know the definitions of what you are talking about.

strawman. they already have single payer. We will just be expanding the current single payer system in the US to cover everyone.

No.. you now need to look up strawman argument.. because I made no such thing... now you are running around with the goal posts in the air.

According to you.. Canadian single payer..should be way better than the US.. which doesn;t have single payer. So why should a person with US Medicare or MEdicaid.. (which are NOT single payer.. since..well they are two different systems... we do not have single payer in the US).. switch to the Canadian government insurance.. which covers less?
 
Yeah.. no they are not "both single payer"..

how can they be "single payer"... when.. they are two different insurances?

By all accounts then.. the US then has single payer. Is that what you are now contending.

Look man.. you can't have a logical discussion when you don;t even know the definitions of what you are talking about.
Medicaid and medicare are both single payer. This is an objective fact of reality. If you don't know what words mean, or how our system operates, you have no business in this discussion.



No.. you now need to look up strawman argument.. because I made no such thing... now you are running around with the goal posts in the air.
nope. the goalposts remain firmly in place where they've always been. Your argument was made up and attributed to me, which is the definition of a strawman. That's why I called you on it.
According to you.. Canadian single payer..should be way better than the US.. which doesn;t have single payer.
already established that we have single payer with Medicaid/medicare. We would simply expand enrollment of medicare to everyone, not just those over 65.
So why should a person with US Medicare or MEdicaid.. (which are NOT single payer.. since..well they are two different systems... we do not have single payer in the US).. switch to the Canadian government insurance.. which covers less?
both medicare and Medicaid are single payer. You keep trying to pin this strawman on me about switching to canadas system, when I've never once maid such a claim.
 
Well.. first you have to decide whether you are talking about universal healthcare.. or single payer healthcare because they aren;t the same thing.

However.. yes.. if you look at what is spent on healthcare including insurance payments and premiums its less than in most other countries.

Then again.. if you look at what WAGES are in those other countries.. you understand why they pay less. Their costs are less.

Which is why by the way.. corporations have fled the US to these other countries were wages are cheaper. Except healthcare can;t flee. So.. in the US.. we pay our medical folks a lot more in general than any other country. and that props up the wages for all the workers in the area. Healthcare in this country is one of the top if not the top source of new jobs. :peace

First of all where in any of my post have I not mentioned Universal Healthcare.

I suggest you take another look at what is spent on Healthcare in America today including the hidden fees of Hospitals Doctors and technicians, plus what is spent not only to pay for medicare, what is spent on MEDICARE part A&B plus the other parts,plus the premiums for prescription drug Insurance. plus Medicaid which comes out of State taxes. most all of these some at least comes out of Federal Taxes this of course is not even counting the rich and what they pay for health insurance.

Yes the U.S Corporations fled to these other countries where wages are cheaper, that migration started in 2000 with outsourcing of jobs.

Tell me how is that working out for America so far at the end of 2008 America was a little over 3 trillion in debt.
What is America's debt today including trade deficits, and IOU'S of course .
How is this great economic system of outsource jobs give tax cuts to the rich working so far??


In the U.S. we pay our Medical folks a lot more in general than any other country
Healthcare in this country is one of the top if not the top source of new jobs.

First of all let's take a closer look at who's getting a lot more pay than any other country.
I have been to see 4 doctors , none were born in America most got the degree in medical from overseas. names like Watasky. AshRof. Petiumalia. Farafuk
From places like Europe , eastern Europe, Middle East, Far East pretty much all over, to you this is Healthcare to foreign doctors this is a Gold Rush.
Care to look up how many applied for work visas with Medical experience, I'll let you look that up nobody ever believes me anyway.

Second ;A top source of new jobs , yes , but for who so the Doctors of the world could get paid more????
If " not if WHEN"America ever does go to Universal Healthcare you might just see a migration of foreign doctors going home..:peace
 
Medicaid and medicare are both single payer. This is an objective fact of reality. If you don't know what words mean, or how our system operates, you have no business in this discussion.

.

Yeah..please explain how two different insurances.. are "single payer". because its not an "objective fact of reality"..

Single payer is just that.. when there is one single payer insurance for a certain set of healthcare services.

Like Canada has one single payer for everyone for hospital, certain outpatient services etc. No other insurance covers these services. In fact.. I believe its a law that they cannot.. (or it was a law at one time).

By definition.. medicare and medicaid Cannot be single payer.. because they are two different insurances which covers the same services. Not to mention.. two different entities cover the bills. In medicare.. its solely the federal government. In medicaid its a mixture of federal government and state government.

So no sir.. medicare and medicaid are NOT "single payer".

But you go ahead and explain exactly how they are..(maybe you can use your peer reviewed paper).

already established that we have single payer with Medicaid/medicare.
Yeah..no we don;t.. see above.

You don;t seem to understand your intellectual disconnect here..

SINGLE PAYER... that means ONE PAYER..

Medicare and medicaid can;t be "both single payer"... because by definition.. they are TWO DIFFERENT INSURANCES and thus not SINGLE!!!
 
I suggest you take another look at what is spent on Healthcare in America today including the hidden fees of Hospitals Doctors and technicians, plus what is spent not only to pay for medicare, what is spent on MEDICARE part A&B plus the other parts,plus the premiums for prescription drug Insurance. plus Medicaid which comes out of State taxes. most all of these some at least comes out of Federal Taxes this of course is not even counting the rich and what they pay for health insurance.
e

Yep. I know exactly what we spend. And I know why.

Yes the U.S Corporations fled to these other countries where wages are cheaper, that migration started in 2000 with outsourcing of jobs.
Bingo.. see above.

So? Do you think its possible..just possible.. that other countries may spend less on healthcare.. partially because they pay LOWER WAGES..than we do in the US?

Tell me how is that working out for America so far at the end of 2008 America was a little over 3 trillion in debt.
What is America's debt today including trade deficits, and IOU'S of course .
How is this great economic system of outsource jobs give tax cuts to the rich working so far?

Not well..so why would you want to make it worse by paying doctors, nurses, technicians, medical billing personnel, speech therapists, physical therapists etc.. less?

n the U.S. we pay our Medical folks a lot more in general than any other country
Healthcare in this country is one of the top if not the top source of new jobs.

Bingo... so what happens if we try to lower the cost of healthcare like other countries.. and reduce the number of jobs and reduce wages.?

Do you think the economy gets BETTER with fewer jobs and lower salaries?

I have been to see 4 doctors , none were born in America most got the degree in medical from overseas. names like Watasky. AshRof. Petiumalia. Farafuk
From places like Europe , eastern Europe, Middle East, Far East pretty much all over, to you this is Healthcare to foreign doctors this is a Gold Rush.
Care to look up how many applied for work visas with Medical experience, I'll let you look that up nobody ever believes me anyway.
Tons. Many of my employees are those very same doctors. Especially in the rural areas. Many foreign trained physicians can get a visa if they are going to work in a underserved area.

Second ;A top source of new jobs , yes , but for who so the Doctors of the world could get paid more????
Absolutely. First because it means that american trained doctors are making more.. and those Doctors of the World making more?

Where are they buying houses, oh right.. in the US..and buying american cars, and spending their money in american shops, and the money that the hospital takes in because of their work? That money goes to pay the housekeeping staff, and the x ray techs and the nurses, and the receptionist and and and..... the list goes on.

If " not if WHEN"America ever does go to Universal Healthcare you might just see a migration of foreign doctors going home

Actually no.. depending on how we get to universal healthcare.. it depends. Universal healthcare could actually mean a greater demand for doctors and more doctors coming to the US. More people with insurance.. means potentially more demand.

If we get to universal healthcare by a single payer.. with lower reimbursement? Then you would likely see MORE foreign trained doctors.. as american trained doctors retire..and fewer americans decide to go through all that expensive medical training.. to make so little. Foreign trained doctors.. will still likely make more here than at home.
 
Yeah..please explain how two different insurances.. are "single payer". because its not an "objective fact of reality"..

Single payer is just that.. when there is one single payer insurance for a certain set of healthcare services.

Like Canada has one single payer for everyone for hospital, certain outpatient services etc. No other insurance covers these services. In fact.. I believe its a law that they cannot.. (or it was a law at one time).

By definition.. medicare and medicaid Cannot be single payer.. because they are two different insurances which covers the same services. Not to mention.. two different entities cover the bills. In medicare.. its solely the federal government. In medicaid its a mixture of federal government and state government.

So no sir.. medicare and medicaid are NOT "single payer".

But you go ahead and explain exactly how they are..(maybe you can use your peer reviewed paper).

this is why you have no business discussing this topic. Medicare/Medicaid are both, by definition and operation, single payer systems.

Yeah..no we don;t.. see above.
I refuted that above.
You don;t seem to understand your intellectual disconnect here..

SINGLE PAYER... that means ONE PAYER..
yes
Medicare and medicaid can;t be "both single payer"... because by definition.. they are TWO DIFFERENT INSURANCES and thus not SINGLE!!!
they are both single payer. the government is paying the medical providers. now, please stop talking about topics you are completely ignorant of.
 
this is why you have no business discussing this topic. Medicare/Medicaid are both, by definition and operation, single payer systems.

f.

Yeah.. please explain how they can be SINGLE PAYER... when they are two different insurances? Single payer means just that... SINGLE PAYER..in other words..ONE insurance.. (usually government but not necessarily)...that covers a collection of medical services for a countries people. (usually basic medical/emergency services).

No..by definition.. medicare.. and medicaid are NOT single payer.

Thats why you don;t have a clue what you are talking about...

Thats why to go to a SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM... we would have to have MEDICARE FOR ALL..

And not Medicaid for some and Medicare for some and Va for some and government subsidized private insurance for some.

Go do some research and when you understand the basics of what single payer is... THEN you come back and discuss.

Do some research.
 
Back
Top Bottom