• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

This is what they call a purge, right?

D

Digger

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
1,302
Reaction score
489
purge = "a removal or execution of people who are considered undesirable by those in power from a government"

Historians will want to know. Do we have a count on the trump purge?

Purge - Wikipedia
 
Digger said:
purge = "a removal or execution of people who are considered undesirable by those in power from a government"

Historians will want to know. Do we have a count on the trump purge?

Purge - Wikipedia
Click to expand...

Question is to what Cause, so the Definition of "Who are undesireable" is to be ConSidered.
Sometimes due to the long thread of history, things straightened need to depend on certain prospects to be considered "undesireable".
So as for what really is and what isn't; needs to be seen for the Greater good and from the Perspective of the Whole. To Some incidences, it will cause one to lose, for the Greater to Gain. By having instances where some have prohibition, is to state that at any given time, This can be "Purged" So.. How high or grant the scale of the count of Trumps Purge is; is yet Questionable.

To some Conclusions are their the Lower Class; Middle Class, and Upper Class.

This is Wherein Politics and Economics Lies in.

To Some We Can but hope through the instance of our Seen that this is 'ALL' for the Greater Good. SO WE PRAY. THAT WE are... One NATION UNder GOD.
 
Digger said:
purge = "a removal or execution of people who are considered undesirable by those in power from a government"

Historians will want to know. Do we have a count on the trump purge?

Purge - Wikipedia
Click to expand...

Question is to what Cause, so the Definition of "Who are undesireable" is to be ConSidered.
Sometimes due to the long thread of history, things straightened need to depend on certain prospects to be considered "undesireable".
So as for what really is and what isn't; needs to be seen for the Greater good and from the Perspective of the Whole. To Some incidences, it will cause one to lose, for the Greater to Gain. By having instances where some have prohibition, is to state that at any given time, This can be "Purged" So.. How high or grant the scale of the count of Trumps Purge is; is yet Questionable.

To some Conclusions are their the Lower Class; Middle Class, and Upper Class.

This is Wherein Politics and Economics Lies in.

To Some We Can but hope through the instance of our Seen that this is 'ALL' for the Greater Good. SO WE PRAY. THAT WE are... One NATION UNder GOD.
 
There's also another meaning, often employing an enema or the thrusting of fingers down one's throat.

Regards, and be glad you're not one of the 15. "Which 15?", you ask. These 15:

"[W]hen you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that's a pretty good job we've done." President of the United States of America Donald Trump. [Ed.: Now, that's a purge!]
 
"clear of a charge or suspicion" c. 1300 Definition
 
Digger said:
purge = "a removal or execution of people who are considered undesirable by those in power from a government"

Historians will want to know. Do we have a count on the trump purge?

Purge - Wikipedia
Click to expand...

I prefer the less loaded term "removing the dead wood". Every business I got involved in required a certain amount of restructuring by eliminating holdovers from the last owners.

Trumps mistake was thinking that many of the prior administrations people should stay since they were good at their jobs. He did not see the sabotage coming because he wasn't a career Washington insider. Most administrations fire nearly every appointed person, and replace them with people known to be loyal. The idea of an outsider coming into the Washington power club was too much for many to bear.
 
chuckiechan said:
I prefer the less loaded term "removing the dead wood". Every business I got involved in required a certain amount of restructuring by eliminating holdovers from the last owners.

Trumps mistake was thinking that many of the prior administrations people should stay since they were good at their jobs. He did not see the sabotage coming because he wasn't a career Washington insider. Most administrations fire nearly every appointed person, and replace them with people known to be loyal. The idea of an outsider coming into the Washington power club was too much for many to bear.
Click to expand...

Make up your mind. Is it an overdue housecleaning, or does everyone do it every four years?

Neither. This is not normal. Most presidents respect the independence of the justice department and inspector general's. They don't make decisions about who to investigate and who to hire and fire, and if they do it's a major scandal. Where did you get the idea that this is normal?
 
chuckiechan said:
I prefer the less loaded term "removing the dead wood". Every business I got involved in required a certain amount of restructuring by eliminating holdovers from the last owners.

Trumps mistake was thinking that many of the prior administrations people should stay since they were good at their jobs. He did not see the sabotage coming because he wasn't a career Washington insider. Most administrations fire nearly every appointed person, and replace them with people known to be loyal. The idea of an outsider coming into the Washington power club was too much for many to bear.
Click to expand...

The problem with that is that Trump wasn't interested in a transition. He fired Christie and said the hell with the transition. Even when offered help by the Obama admin, he said hell no.

That's also what happens when you elect a clown to the WH. You get a bad circus. It's gotten worse since day one with no end in sight. (Except for November 3rd.)
 
Digger said:
Make up your mind. Is it an overdue housecleaning, or does everyone do it every four years?

Neither. This is not normal. Most presidents respect the independence of the justice department and inspector general's. They don't make decisions about who to investigate and who to hire and fire, and if they do it's a major scandal. Where did you get the idea that this is normal?
Click to expand...

Barr and Trump..
 
you're right the same thing that the moderators here are doing to me they don't like me questioning me
and they don't like that many republican members here are being paid to post here against our constitution
 
chuckiechan said:
I prefer the less loaded term "removing the dead wood". Every business I got involved in required a certain amount of restructuring by eliminating holdovers from the last owners.

Trumps mistake was thinking that many of the prior administrations people should stay since they were good at their jobs. He did not see the sabotage coming because he wasn't a career Washington insider. Most administrations fire nearly every appointed person, and replace them with people known to be loyal. The idea of an outsider coming into the Washington power club was too much for many to bear.
Click to expand...

His Heidsight has failed him, as one new to the Political Arena; But as the Purge was necessary as Digger mentioned:

purge = "a removal or execution of people who are considered undesirable by those in power from a government"
Click to expand...

The Purge of the 1300c Definition is also to keep him of the scope of Democrats Which in their World Mass Attempt to Cause Havoc to this Nation by their World Dominions of Concession to the Dominance of World Order: to "clear of a charge or suspicion" That Trump is Associated with By the Dem's and the Driven News of them -(Dems).

The Constitution is at Stake as they Intent to Add a 51st State of Washington D.C. in Which Neutrality would be abolished of the Capital - Another Plan of Dem's to the Governmental State of their World Order Which does not Desire Trump; a Personage that is not a Washington Insider to be Corrupted of by the Democratic Desires of World Dominance.

Hence is this Covid-19 Matter used against Trump to Get Trump out of Office; Which did not Do to the States Bad before the Epidemic's; With Rises to all the Notions of Economic Foundations; But yet as the Blue States Run by Democrats Close Down after Reopening Through the News Relay of New Rise of Cases after having Reopened; Trump is Forced Against the Fearmongers of the Dem's Which is to Kick him out of Office.

Dem's Don't Care if Blue States like California Lose Economy and the People Suffer Seen they are non they have to answer to in their Elitist, to Disregard Middle Class People Which they Neither Care For nor want to Rise to an Upper Class above their Norm on itself. So they Close and Open, Use Fearmonging Tactics to Cause the People to Vote for Another as such as a Democratic Biden Who Would Play in the Role and Schemes of the Democratic Notion Which Want Washington D.C. to be Announced as an Unconstitutional 51'st State So to Cause More Corruption Playing into this Black Life's Matter Column That is Driven by the Dem's Itself. In their Hierarchy.

If Trump Looses, then the People of the Republic of the Unite States With it; Seen that the Washington Insider's Will Play their Games of Schemes to Cause More Corruption to the Constitution in the Disregarding of the Common Well-Being of the People of the US. But Regard it their Destiny to Predict the Fall of the Liberty For Which IT Stands.

This Theirfore is Trump on a Purge For in Term's of Digger's Wikipedia Quotation: "to "a removal or execution of people who are considered undesirable by those in power from a government" in the Necessity to Purge himself of the 1300c. Claim Definition to "clear (himself) of a/the charge or suspicion" by the Democratic Fake Driven News to Overthrow the System of the People By the People For the People as intended by the Founding Father's According to the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Right's.
 
Last edited:
chuckiechan said:
I prefer the less loaded term "removing the dead wood". Every business I got involved in required a certain amount of restructuring by eliminating holdovers from the last owners.

Trumps mistake was thinking that many of the prior administrations people should stay since they were good at their jobs. He did not see the sabotage coming because he wasn't a career Washington insider.
Click to expand...

Uh . . . . no. Trump was actually too damned lazy to even be bothered refilling the positions of everyone he could fire. And he certainly had no intention whatsoever of draining any swamp, when he knew his own intention was always to profit from whatever swamp he could generate himself. This was quite obvious when we all witnessed how Trump attempted to eviscerate Hillary based on her relationship to Goldman Sachs - and then after winning the election, he promptly did .... what?

Trump’s Team Overseeing Wall Street Brings In More Goldman Sachs Alumni, Docs Reveal
 
White House goes through dizzying change in staff | TheHill

This is when Trump by administration understood that the staffing of people was necessary despite his compulsive administrative form, he associated himself with. As Trump was of the Business Relations before Presidency, he understood for what it was worth to make a comeback of relations to be of worth, hence was the staffing change in a belated means as matters pressing were related to his scene, Question is will it help him in the re-election process, as this comes in a timely matter quiet late; but with a punch down the throat to some as Press Secretary as Recently Someone employed by the Trump Administration faces the news media in a candid cunning delegate/ elegant manner, As for the Staffing which is befitting to the Trump Administration to begin with as being.

As for the Goldman Sachs Condition, he as a Business Man had matters pressing at this given time, to run matters per precept in the order thus given; of Which questionary to some His Game plan might be to be proven in the re-election and its form. So Whereas lazyness can be debated; it could be debated whether his strategy is to pay off as a newcomer to the Political Arena to this scope, in the late run of staff maneuverability in the duration of the campaign time to the [re]-election of his presidency.

White House Goes through dizzying change in Staff |·TheHill
 
Last edited:
jimjeff said:
you're right the same thing that the moderators here are doing to me they don't like me questioning me
and they don't like that many republican members here are being paid to post here against our constitution
Click to expand...

Lol nah. I doubt that is the case.
 
MamboDervish said:
Uh . . . . no. Trump was actually too damned lazy to even be bothered refilling the positions of everyone he could fire. And he certainly had no intention whatsoever of draining any swamp, when he knew his own intention was always to profit from whatever swamp he could generate himself. This was quite obvious when we all witnessed how Trump attempted to eviscerate Hillary based on her relationship to Goldman Sachs - and then after winning the election, he promptly did .... what?

Trump’s Team Overseeing Wall Street Brings In More Goldman Sachs Alumni, Docs Reveal
Click to expand...


Yeah he always meant draining washington of any democratic influence so that half the country gets little to no representation.
 
Mr ep·iscope said:
White House goes through dizzying change in staff | TheHill

This is when Trump by administration understood that the staffing of people was necessary despite his compulsive administrative form, he associated himself with. As Trump was of the Business Relations before Presidency, he understood for what it was worth to make a comeback of relations to be of worth, hence was the staffing change in a belated means as matters pressing were related to his scene, Question is will it help him in the re-election process, as this comes in a timely matter quiet late; but with a punch down the throat to some as Press Secretary as Recently Someone employed by the Trump Administration faces the news media in a candid cunning delegate/ elegant manner, As for the Staffing which is befitting to the Trump Administration to begin with as being.

As for the Goldman Sachs Condition, he as a Business Man had matters pressing at this given time, to run matters per precept in the order thus given; of Which questionary to some His Game plan might be to be proven in the re-election and its form. So Whereas lazyness can be debated; it could be debated whether his strategy is to pay off as a newcomer to the Political Arena to this scope, in the late run of staff maneuverability in the duration of the campaign time to the [re]-election of his presidency.

White House Goes through dizzying change in Staff |·TheHill
Click to expand...

Lol 4d chess meister here we go!
 
chuckiechan said:
I prefer the less loaded term "removing the dead wood". Every business I got involved in required a certain amount of restructuring by eliminating holdovers from the last owners.

Trumps mistake was thinking that many of the prior administrations people should stay since they were good at their jobs. He did not see the sabotage coming because he wasn't a career Washington insider. Most administrations fire nearly every appointed person, and replace them with people known to be loyal. The idea of an outsider coming into the Washington power club was too much for many to bear.
Click to expand...

Inspector Generals are not political appointees and Trump has removed four of them in 2 months.

Defending his decision to fire a fourth inspector general this year, President Donald Trump has misleadingly compared his record to past presidents, claiming, “I think every president has gotten rid of probably more than I have.”
According to a recently released Congressional Research Service report, since 2000, Barack Obama was the only president to remove an inspector general, and he removed one. Trump has now removed four in less than two months.
Click to expand...

Trump Twists Record on Inspectors General - FactCheck.org
 
Digger said:
purge = "a removal or execution of people who are considered undesirable by those in power from a government"

Historians will want to know. Do we have a count on the trump purge?

Purge - Wikipedia
Click to expand...

All Moderate and Liberal Voters no matter what party…. must assume CONSERVATIVES may have purged YOU from the voting rolls. Any way possible:
ALEC: The Voice of Corporate Special Interests in State Legislatures | Right Wing Watch



ATTACK VOTER SUPPRESSION

Voters ORGANIZE A VOTING DAY PACKET

— 2 recent Utility Bills

--- a birth certificate

 --- drivers license or state ID card

--- proof of voter registration etc etc etc.

--- Passport

--- Keep it close by

Let's get on with it. WE voters have a mess to clean up.
 
Razoo said:
All Moderate and Liberal Voters no matter what party…. must assume CONSERVATIVES may have purged YOU from the voting rolls. Any way possible:
ALEC: The Voice of Corporate Special Interests in State Legislatures | Right Wing Watch



ATTACK VOTER SUPPRESSION

Voters ORGANIZE A VOTING DAY PACKET

— 2 recent Utility Bills

--- a birth certificate

 --- drivers license or state ID card

--- proof of voter registration etc etc etc.

--- Passport

--- Keep it close by

Let's get on with it. WE voters have a mess to clean up.
Click to expand...

Wrong thread. This is about the civil service purge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom