- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Messages
- 82,034
- Reaction score
- 19,724
- Location
- Houston, in the great state of Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
I'm a freelance mechanic, that's been working on various things for about 20 years.
As a freelance mechanic I can pick and choose what I work on. Something I've noticed with automobiles are the German automobiles have sometimes punitively high parts replacement costs. Which of course cuts into my profit. So I just don't work on them. I figured the high costs were due to import prices.
So something I've stumbled upon while I was surfing the internet was this article about Farmers buying old tractors driving up the price. And it turns out they're paying 40 to $60,000 for tractors that are over two decades old because the new ones have been designed to where you can't repair them. Either they have some sort of software gateway or they have some form proprietary barrier, forcing you to go through the manufacturer.
Sometimes the manufacturers charge five figures for repairs.
So it got me thinking about right to repair and apparently this is a thing. I was watching a video from a guy who does repairs on cellular phones and computers and he was talking about Apple products. I had an iPod years ago and I was having a little difficulty with its function end basically Apple told me I have to replace it. After spending $300 on it and having it for just over a year. I was done with the product at that point. But apparently things have gotten worse.
So back to right to repair, and what this means. It is essentially legislation that forbids manufacturers from putting on needlessly complicated gateways and proprietary barriers for repairs. Is this a form of Monopoly? Is this a form of antitrust?
I'm not sure this seems to be new territory.
What are your thoughts?
Farmers Are Buying Up Old Tractors Because New Ones Are Pointlessly Complicated and Expensive - The Drive
As a freelance mechanic I can pick and choose what I work on. Something I've noticed with automobiles are the German automobiles have sometimes punitively high parts replacement costs. Which of course cuts into my profit. So I just don't work on them. I figured the high costs were due to import prices.
So something I've stumbled upon while I was surfing the internet was this article about Farmers buying old tractors driving up the price. And it turns out they're paying 40 to $60,000 for tractors that are over two decades old because the new ones have been designed to where you can't repair them. Either they have some sort of software gateway or they have some form proprietary barrier, forcing you to go through the manufacturer.
Sometimes the manufacturers charge five figures for repairs.
So it got me thinking about right to repair and apparently this is a thing. I was watching a video from a guy who does repairs on cellular phones and computers and he was talking about Apple products. I had an iPod years ago and I was having a little difficulty with its function end basically Apple told me I have to replace it. After spending $300 on it and having it for just over a year. I was done with the product at that point. But apparently things have gotten worse.
So back to right to repair, and what this means. It is essentially legislation that forbids manufacturers from putting on needlessly complicated gateways and proprietary barriers for repairs. Is this a form of Monopoly? Is this a form of antitrust?
I'm not sure this seems to be new territory.
What are your thoughts?
Farmers Are Buying Up Old Tractors Because New Ones Are Pointlessly Complicated and Expensive - The Drive