• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump White House - not Transparent

Rosie1

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
1,914
Reaction score
1,005
Location
Pacific Northwest
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
While members of Trump’s 2016 campaign are now under investigation for collusion with Russia, the administration is steadily reducing the amount of publicly available information about the activities of federal agencies and straight out refusing to disclose vital information, i.e. who has visited the White House. White House staff are using encrypted messaging applications to communicate, which delete messages after receipt. Not only is deleting presidential communications a violation of the Presidential Records Act, but their deletion means we will never know if they contained evidence of criminal wrongdoing or explained a major policy initiative.

According to the Federal Register, at just over eight months in office, President Trump has filed 46 executive orders. By contrast, Obama issued an average of 34 executive orders per year throughout his 8-year tenure, and for most of his time in office, Congress was controlled by the Republican Party. Excessive use of executive orders is objectionable, because the records related to those orders are legally shielded from scrutiny, (The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA/1966/Lyndon Johnson) does not apply to the White House or Congress) whereas agency decisions are subject to FOIA and held to various regulatory standards such as the Administrative Procedure Act. Constitutional concerns and executive privilege have led Congress and the courts to grant the president a wide and nearly impregnable zone of privacy. This works better when an administration abides by the ethical standards and norms that accompany the office of the presidency, and with a president that affirmatively makes the White House more accountable — by publishing White House visitor logs, for example. (Homepage - CREW)

I heard something similar on NBC, so I looked it up. Wow, that's right, Trump does hate NBC., among other news groups.
 
When you consider it Trump's White House is so white it would have to be transparent ...unless purposeful shuck and jive were involved to obscure the view. Trump would never have that done on his behalf, right? :eek:
 
While members of Trump’s 2016 campaign are now under investigation for collusion with Russia, the administration is steadily reducing the amount of publicly available information about the activities of federal agencies and straight out refusing to disclose vital information, i.e. who has visited the White House. White House staff are using encrypted messaging applications to communicate, which delete messages after receipt. Not only is deleting presidential communications a violation of the Presidential Records Act, but their deletion means we will never know if they contained evidence of criminal wrongdoing or explained a major policy initiative.

According to the Federal Register, at just over eight months in office, President Trump has filed 46 executive orders. By contrast, Obama issued an average of 34 executive orders per year throughout his 8-year tenure, and for most of his time in office, Congress was controlled by the Republican Party. Excessive use of executive orders is objectionable, because the records related to those orders are legally shielded from scrutiny, (The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA/1966/Lyndon Johnson) does not apply to the White House or Congress) whereas agency decisions are subject to FOIA and held to various regulatory standards such as the Administrative Procedure Act. Constitutional concerns and executive privilege have led Congress and the courts to grant the president a wide and nearly impregnable zone of privacy. This works better when an administration abides by the ethical standards and norms that accompany the office of the presidency, and with a president that affirmatively makes the White House more accountable — by publishing White House visitor logs, for example. (Homepage - CREW)

I heard something similar on NBC, so I looked it up. Wow, that's right, Trump does hate NBC., among other news groups.

This makes it sound like Trump's policy is very much like Obama's in this regard--secrecy.
 
While members of Trump’s 2016 campaign are now under investigation for collusion with Russia, the administration is steadily reducing the amount of publicly available information about the activities of federal agencies and straight out refusing to disclose vital information, i.e. who has visited the White House. White House staff are using encrypted messaging applications to communicate, which delete messages after receipt. Not only is deleting presidential communications a violation of the Presidential Records Act, but their deletion means we will never know if they contained evidence of criminal wrongdoing or explained a major policy initiative.

According to the Federal Register, at just over eight months in office, President Trump has filed 46 executive orders. By contrast, Obama issued an average of 34 executive orders per year throughout his 8-year tenure, and for most of his time in office, Congress was controlled by the Republican Party. Excessive use of executive orders is objectionable, because the records related to those orders are legally shielded from scrutiny, (The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA/1966/Lyndon Johnson) does not apply to the White House or Congress) whereas agency decisions are subject to FOIA and held to various regulatory standards such as the Administrative Procedure Act. Constitutional concerns and executive privilege have led Congress and the courts to grant the president a wide and nearly impregnable zone of privacy. This works better when an administration abides by the ethical standards and norms that accompany the office of the presidency, and with a president that affirmatively makes the White House more accountable — by publishing White House visitor logs, for example. (Homepage - CREW)

I heard something similar on NBC, so I looked it up. Wow, that's right, Trump does hate NBC., among other news groups.

I couldn't find any threads by you complaining when Obama did essentially the same thing. Odd that. :roll:
 
Well, at least Obama's people weren't investigated for collusion with the Russians.
 
Back
Top Bottom