- Joined
- Apr 25, 2011
- Messages
- 25,803
- Reaction score
- 20,579
- Location
- Austin, Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I think that people who voted for Hillary removed their minds beforehand.
I think that the 2016 presidential candidates were possibly the worst in American History. Literally the bottom feeders of the political pool.
The question people should be asking themselves is how the hell did Hillary Clinton an Donald Trump wind up with the nominations?
So many Trump supporters claim that they voted for Trump based on what they believed to be his fundamental qualifications and merits to be president. I call, BULL****! They voted against Hillary. A mentally challenged person should have known Trump's reputation as an unscrupulous, narcissistic, megalomaniac who only lives in Trump World. Everybody else are his serfs.
Hillary carries her own nasty, unscrupulous luggage. The Clinton's want people to believe that they've "earned" their power and wealth when the truth is that they, via every means possible, have manipulated their way into the world of the privileged. But make no mistake into believing otherwise, so many voters who voted for Hillary was a vote against Trump.
One of the core problems in our system of selecting candidates is....
Only 14 to 16% of the voters are selecting the candidates during the primaries. The candidate vetting process isn't disseminated to the public. The political machines (strongly influenced by the lobby communities) try to get candidates on the ballots so it's a win for them regardless of who makes the primary cuts.
Would you vote for Steve Bannon or Anthony Scaramucci for president?
Would you vote for George Soros or Maxine Waters for president?
If the nominees were Bannon and Soros who would you vote for?
Why would these folks wind up in the primaries, much less be nominees?