- Joined
- Dec 1, 2017
- Messages
- 24,476
- Reaction score
- 7,808
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Therein resides the rub with your argument, Cordeller.
The only time the arbitrary "most qualified" issue gets raised...is when a minority or a female gets the nod (regardless of the arena: politics, business, law, medicine, etc. etc.)
Was Dan Quayle "most qualified" option in 1988? Hardly.
Sarah Palin. Enough said.
Was Mike Pence the single "most qualified" option in 2016? Not even remotely.
Was Paul Ryan the "most qualified" option 2012? Maybe, considering the historically awful field of candidates in 2012.
Was Jack Kemp the single "most qualified" option in 1996? Nope. Certainly not more qualified than long-term Senators like Arlen Specter, Lamar Alexander, Phil Graham and Dick Lugar who campaigned in '96.
Was Al Gore the "most qualified" option 1992? Debatable.
Truth is "most qualified" (on paper) rarely gets the job...anywhere. There are too many other factors to consider. Anyone who runs a business understands this...and can tell you why. What we do is chose the "best fit" from among a list of qualified options.
Kamala Harris is certainly well-qualified for the position. That's all that matters. She was Joe Biden's choice. Whether, or not, she's the single "most qualified" person for the position is a subjective matter. The only thing we can say for sure is that if she was white and male, questions about "most qualified" would have never arisen.
Is Joe Biden the best choice? No way Jose'. Joe has some conservative leanings which is why so many conservatives are coming out for Status Quo Joe.