You have promoted no evidence at all. You found a list of measures that do not prove your point. Difference in outcome does not mean there is a rig system. In fact it means the opposite. A systemically racist system would have equal outcome between all races. Because we know that different groups of people have different cultures different values different matters of acting. So it only stands to reason they would have different outcomes. The only way That a system where groups that we call races could have equal outcomes without systemic racism is if they all did everything exactly equal. And you cannot show that.
Your data is accurate, but it does not support your conclusion.
Here is the nub of Trump's argument against stripping the names of Confederate generals from military bases. It appears in Mark Thiessen's column in the Post this mornng:
“I believe in history. To me, this was Fort Bragg named after somebody as a reconciliation matter. I mean he was a general, he was a tough general, he’s very tough, but this was done for reconciliation. These bases were named to bring the South because it was tremendous animosity from the many years to bring the South . . .”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...-statues-renaming-cancel-culture/?arc404=true
If I may, reconciliation was letting "the generals" go home and resume civilian life as American citizens, in lieu of hanging them. It was decidedly not erecting heroic statues in their honor or immortalizing their names at military bases.
ok well 1 caveat, I am not speaking to business dealings, I am speaking to police interactions.
7 Statistics That Show That ‘Systemic Racism’ Doesn’t Exist In Policing | The Daily Wire
WARNING: this video shows graphic violence:
YouTube
In this case I was referring to the love of the confederacy and the decades of treating black people like second class citizens or worse. Because of that and there being no real coming to terms, this has been a part of our national story, which is part of the fuel for the frustration that we are seeing everywhere. The fact that democrats happen to be mayors have nothing to do with the riots given that the problem of the poor (and disenfranchisement of minorities for historical reasons I already mentioned) being concentrated into parts of certain cities and that resulting hopelessness creating a negative cultural feedback loop which then fuels negative stereo types in other groups. This created a powder keg. However, going back to the poor being concentrates, that creates problems in any city throughout history or pretty much any nation. That is not an ideological problem but an economic one (and one that is probably unsolvable under any ideology)
I would agree, welfare should be abolished, the birth control pill outlawed, no-fault divorce abolished, etc. And prayer brought back to schools. The liberal position on these issues has completely destroyed the black middle class.
It should be a criminal offense for fathers to abandon their children as well.
The Daily Wire - Media Bias/Fact Check
Overall, we rate The Daily Wire borderline questionable and Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that align with the conservative right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks. If the Daily Wire fails another fact check will be moved to the Questionable list.
That argument might have been valid if the base was named shortly after the Civil War, but not decades later in 1921.
The difference in outcome is the proof of the rigged system and is the result of decades of compounding issues. You refusing to see that is on you.
The base wasn’t named 50+ years after the Civil War ended to facilitate reconciliation. A ridiculous assertion.Actually that’s exactly what it was.
And besides, it would be evil to eliminate memorials now or rename bases because it would only legitimize insurrection and rioting as a form of enacting political change
i don't care what political leaning fact check organizations call it. I can see FBI statistics and check the accuracy. if you come up with an anomaly on that front, let me know.
You do realise this is 2020, not 1820? Thank goodness those with your anachronistic attitude are dying off.
That is all nice information, but fails to explain how changing the name of a military base in Texas would fix (alter?) any of it - especially if the basis of these problems was economic (which I very much doubt). Where I live, the median household income is about $20K below the US median, yet the crime rate is very low.
Uhland, Texas - Wikipedia
Thank goodness black children are not getting a good education and are dying in the streets. Is what you’re saying. You seem to think that long-standing social structures that the left eliminated during the sexual and cultural revolution of the 60s we’re just oppressive systems of power. In fact they were structures that were built over thousands of years of philosophical and moral advancements that created the type of society where people could live in relative freedom and prosperity.
No, it is not.
If you and I took a test, and I got a higher grade than you. The system was not rigged by necessity. If I spent every night studying, and practicing the material and preparing for a test. And you spent every other night partying and drinking. I would get a higher grade than you that system is not rigged. A lot of differences in group outcome, are attributable to personal choices made by people in those groups. Go look at some of these Black Lives Matter rioters in the streets and the vile disgusting manner in which they talk. Tried correcting their English or telling them to use regular non-violent language. Just see what happens. Talking and acting in a manner that is offensive to the majority of the population, will in enough itself result in lower outcomes. We know that happens because people from the south talk in a manner that sounds unrefined and uneducated. And that is just one difference. However you can always choose to speak without vulgarity, and you can always spend time learning to speak better English. That is within your ability. But if you are black and try to work on the manner in which you talk you will be accused of acting white. And that’s an insult
How is that the fault of white racists?
The base wasn’t named 50+ years after the Civil War ended to facilitate reconciliation. A ridiculous assertion.
And it wouldn’t be evil to to rename bases. It is appropriate and way past due. Another ridiculous assertion.
Removing monuments to traitors isn’t political. And a third ridiculous assertion.
Times have changed, and progress is inevitable.But the fact of the matter still stands that these names and statues remained so long, because a vast majority of people were largely fine with them staying exactly where they were.
It goes into the cultural context piece. If you live in a society that celebrates keeping people like you down (even if its history, but still celebrated), most people would want to correct that history because it feeds into the narrative of today, which needs to be changed.
Admittedly, this problem is complex because it is two issues that feed into each other. One is racism and the other is economic. But I can imagine a lot of rural people can see it in their own context with the way people are made fun of in the south for being uneducated poor yokels and therefore not getting all the opportunities due to them because of that perception (which feeds into the sort of resentment that got us Trump). You guys face the same issue often enough, but you guys (Uhland and other similar places) don't have to fight racial perceptions on top of it which just compounds the issue and makes it easy for people to be classified in inappropriate ways.
Uhland, TX is majority non-white (if you count Hispanic/Latinx, black and Asian folks as 'people of color'). The demographic elephant in the room seems to be households without a daddy present - when that rises from 11%, as in Uhland, to 70% (or more), as in "the hood", then you have a very different outcome.
It makes perfect sense.
The names have existed for a century, there is no reason to change them, and people who want the change are revolutionary marxists who’ve endorsed violence. So giving in on their demands will only legitimize violence as a means of political change
The problem of broken marriage is something I agree is a major issue and I would strongly support policies that encourage people to remain married through various incentives, so long as they recognized all types of families.