• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The US needs an Internal State Security bureau to punish subversion

EMNofSeattle

EMNofSeattle

No Russian ever called me deplorable
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
51,768
Reaction score
14,180
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Considering how local officials are letting subversive insurrectionists take to the street while threatening their victims with prosecution, and are being openly discriminatory against people by political view point (statue toppling is unprosecuted whereas BLM mural being graffitied is) it’s clear to me we need a Federal Internal Security law.

I would write it to criminaLize subversives, which I would define as anyone who self idenfities as marxist (so BLM leaders) anyone who destroys monuments to state or national or religious heroes without authorization, any person or group participating in political terrorism, meaning demanding political change outside of authorized peaceful marches or the legislative process, any person vandalized buildings in an urban area during a riot affiliated with Marxist ideology, and any local officials who prosecute citizens for using force against subversive violence. or encourage violence because they agree with the political message of rioters.

A big problem is local officials like in Portland are allowing people arrested for riot involvement out on bail the next morning and they go right back to rioting. My idea of an internal state security law would suspend habeus corpus for suspected subversives and keep them in custody until trial. Mandatory minimum sentence of ten years subject only to release by presidential pardon.

In many states theres been hundreds of millions of dollars in damage due to violent insurrection based on a set of lies.
 
Last edited:
Geheime Staatspolizei?
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Considering how local officials are letting subversive insurrectionists take to the street while threatening their victims with prosecution, and are being openly discriminatory against people by political view point (statue toppling is unprosecuted whereas BLM mural being graffitied is) it’s clear to me we need a Federal Internal Security law.

I would write it to criminaLize subversives, which I would define as anyone who self idenfities as marxist (so BLM leaders) anyone who destroys monuments to state or national or religious heroes without authorization, any person or group participating in political terrorism, meaning demanding political change outside of authorized peaceful marches or the legislative process, any person vandalized buildings in an urban area during a riot affiliated with Marxist ideology, and any local officials who prosecute citizens for using force against subversive violence. or encourage violence because they agree with the political message of rioters.

A big problem is local officials like in Portland are allowing people arrested for riot involvement out on bail the next morning and they go right back to rioting. My idea of an internal state security law would suspend habeus corpus for suspected subversives and keep them in custody until trial. Mandatory minimum sentence of ten years subject only to release by presidential pardon.

In many states theres been hundreds of millions of dollars in damage due to violent insurrection based on a set of lies.
Click to expand...

monty_inquisition.jpg
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Considering how local officials are letting subversive insurrectionists take to the street while threatening their victims with prosecution, and are being openly discriminatory against people by political view point (statue toppling is unprosecuted whereas BLM mural being graffitied is) it’s clear to me we need a Federal Internal Security law.

I would write it to criminaLize subversives, which I would define as anyone who self idenfities as marxist (so BLM leaders) anyone who destroys monuments to state or national or religious heroes without authorization, any person or group participating in political terrorism, meaning demanding political change outside of authorized peaceful marches or the legislative process, any person vandalized buildings in an urban area during a riot affiliated with Marxist ideology, and any local officials who prosecute citizens for using force against subversive violence. or encourage violence because they agree with the political message of rioters.

A big problem is local officials like in Portland are allowing people arrested for riot involvement out on bail the next morning and they go right back to rioting. My idea of an internal state security law would suspend habeus corpus for suspected subversives and keep them in custody until trial. Mandatory minimum sentence of ten years subject only to release by presidential pardon.

In many states theres been hundreds of millions of dollars in damage due to violent insurrection based on a set of lies.
Click to expand...
Too bad Himmler isn’t available, right?
 
Which other rightists want to agree with the opinion expessed here that we should have a secret police to crack down on dissent? Any want to say no?
 
1109716_Lives_Of_Others.jpg
 
We can build gulags for enemies of the state in Montanna!
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Considering how local officials are letting subversive insurrectionists take to the street while threatening their victims with prosecution, and are being openly discriminatory against people by political view point (statue toppling is unprosecuted whereas BLM mural being graffitied is) it’s clear to me we need a Federal Internal Security law.

I would write it to criminaLize subversives, which I would define as anyone who self idenfities as marxist (so BLM leaders) anyone who destroys monuments to state or national or religious heroes without authorization, any person or group participating in political terrorism, meaning demanding political change outside of authorized peaceful marches or the legislative process, any person vandalized buildings in an urban area during a riot affiliated with Marxist ideology, and any local officials who prosecute citizens for using force against subversive violence. or encourage violence because they agree with the political message of rioters.

A big problem is local officials like in Portland are allowing people arrested for riot involvement out on bail the next morning and they go right back to rioting. My idea of an internal state security law would suspend habeus corpus for suspected subversives and keep them in custody until trial. Mandatory minimum sentence of ten years subject only to release by presidential pardon.

In many states theres been hundreds of millions of dollars in damage due to violent insurrection based on a set of lies.
Click to expand...
Thankfully you will never have any authority.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Considering how local officials are letting subversive insurrectionists take to the street while threatening their victims with prosecution, and are being openly discriminatory against people by political view point (statue toppling is unprosecuted whereas BLM mural being graffitied is) it’s clear to me we need a Federal Internal Security law.

I would write it to criminaLize subversives, which I would define as anyone who self idenfities as marxist (so BLM leaders) anyone who destroys monuments to state or national or religious heroes without authorization, any person or group participating in political terrorism, meaning demanding political change outside of authorized peaceful marches or the legislative process, any person vandalized buildings in an urban area during a riot affiliated with Marxist ideology, and any local officials who prosecute citizens for using force against subversive violence. or encourage violence because they agree with the political message of rioters.

A big problem is local officials like in Portland are allowing people arrested for riot involvement out on bail the next morning and they go right back to rioting. My idea of an internal state security law would suspend habeus corpus for suspected subversives and keep them in custody until trial. Mandatory minimum sentence of ten years subject only to release by presidential pardon.

In many states theres been hundreds of millions of dollars in damage due to violent insurrection based on a set of lies.
Click to expand...

We’ll keep that in mind.

You already have your fuhrer. And a functioning Ministry of Propoganda.

Now, you want a secret police.

We’ll keep that in mind the next time you rant about freedom, the Constitution
 
Let me see your papers, please.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
I don’t think that’s bad, but you’re entitled to your opinion. I will not cancel you for it
Click to expand...
If you want to live in a totalitarian state, move to DPRK or China.
 
rocket88 said:
Which other rightists want to agree with the opinion expessed here that we should have a secret police to crack down on dissent? Any want to say no?
Click to expand...

I never said secret police or dissent. I stated marxists violating people’s rights in a violent matter should be detained
 
EMNofSeattle said:
I never said secret police or dissent. I stated marxists violating people’s rights in a violent matter should be detained
Click to expand...

So because you used different words that mean the same thing, it's totally different. Right.

To be fair, you never said this police force would be a secret, so.....

Who else is on board for creating a totally not secret police force to crack down on people with different opinions?
 
TomFitz said:
We’ll keep that in mind.

You already have your fuhrer. And a functioning Ministry of Propoganda.

Now, you want a secret police.

We’ll keep that in mind the next time you rant about freedom, the Constitution
Click to expand...

The Constitution is only about guns though, isn't it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom