• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

World Health Organization says no masks

Simpletruther

DP Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2019
Messages
16,317
Reaction score
3,201
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
At least in the blanket general sense.

5 Questions: Stanford scientists on COVID-19 mask guidelines | News Center | Stanford Medicine

https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1279750/retrieve


Many countries have recommended the use of fabric masks/face coverings for the general public. At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider (see below).

The new guidelines recommend that everyone who comes in close contact with others in crowded or close quarters, such as on a bus or in a store, wear a cloth mask composed of at least three different layers of material. People 60 or older, or those with underlying health conditions, should wear medical masks, such as surgical masks, in public, and physicians and health care providers should wear medical masks in all areas of a hospital, even if the area in which they are working has no COVID-19 patients, according to the organization.


Notice he underlined part.

If social distancing is practiced, it’s not recommended to wear the mask.


How is it thst reasonable people cannot disagree on this?


Also notice, the it’s reommended the mask have 3 layers. Nobody gives a ratsxass if it has three layers. I think the reason is that it’s about signaling your tribal allegiance for many.

Not wearing a mask means you are a filthy deplorable. It’s not about the effectiveness, it’s about who you are if not wearing one. It’s a sad stste of affairs.
 
Last edited:
Masks are the new religion brought by the Fauci/MSM fear factor.
 
At least in the blanket general sense.

5 Questions: Stanford scientists on COVID-19 mask guidelines | News Center | Stanford Medicine

https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1279750/retrieve


Many countries have recommended the use of fabric masks/face coverings for the general public. At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider (see below).

The new guidelines recommend that everyone who comes in close contact with others in crowded or close quarters, such as on a bus or in a store, wear a cloth mask composed of at least three different layers of material. People 60 or older, or those with underlying health conditions, should wear medical masks, such as surgical masks, in public, and physicians and health care providers should wear medical masks in all areas of a hospital, even if the area in which they are working has no COVID-19 patients, according to the organization.


Notice he underlined part.

If social distancing is practiced, it’s not recommended to wear the mask.


How is it thst reasonable people cannot disagree on this?


Also notice, the it’s reommended the mask have 3 layers. Nobody gives a ratsxass if it has three layers. I think the reason is that it’s about signaling your tribal allegiance for many.

Not wearing a mask means you are a filthy deplorable. It’s not about the effectiveness, it’s about who you are if not wearing one. It’s a sad stste of affairs.

What is sad is some morons can't just wear a d*"n mask.
 
At least in the blanket general sense.

5 Questions: Stanford scientists on COVID-19 mask guidelines | News Center | Stanford Medicine

https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1279750/retrieve


Many countries have recommended the use of fabric masks/face coverings for the general public. At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider (see below).

The new guidelines recommend that everyone who comes in close contact with others in crowded or close quarters, such as on a bus or in a store, wear a cloth mask composed of at least three different layers of material. People 60 or older, or those with underlying health conditions, should wear medical masks, such as surgical masks, in public, and physicians and health care providers should wear medical masks in all areas of a hospital, even if the area in which they are working has no COVID-19 patients, according to the organization.


Notice he underlined part.

If social distancing is practiced, it’s not recommended to wear the mask.

How is it thst reasonable people cannot disagree on this?

Also notice, the it’s reommended the mask have 3 layers. Nobody gives a ratsxass if it has three layers. I think the reason is that it’s about signaling your tribal allegiance for many.

Not wearing a mask means you are a filthy deplorable. It’s not about the effectiveness, it’s about who you are if not wearing one. It’s a sad stste of affairs.

In other words wear masks when you expect contact with others.

The problem is common sense isn't a common virtue.

And since you can't force others to social distance you cannot depend on social distance to protect you.
 
At least in the blanket general sense.

5 Questions: Stanford scientists on COVID-19 mask guidelines | News Center | Stanford Medicine

https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1279750/retrieve


Many countries have recommended the use of fabric masks/face coverings for the general public. At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider (see below).

The new guidelines recommend that everyone who comes in close contact with others in crowded or close quarters, such as on a bus or in a store, wear a cloth mask composed of at least three different layers of material. People 60 or older, or those with underlying health conditions, should wear medical masks, such as surgical masks, in public, and physicians and health care providers should wear medical masks in all areas of a hospital, even if the area in which they are working has no COVID-19 patients, according to the organization.


Notice he underlined part.

If social distancing is practiced, it’s not recommended to wear the mask.


How is it thst reasonable people cannot disagree on this?


Also notice, the it’s reommended the mask have 3 layers. Nobody gives a ratsxass if it has three layers. I think the reason is that it’s about signaling your tribal allegiance for many.

Not wearing a mask means you are a filthy deplorable. It’s not about the effectiveness, it’s about who you are if not wearing one. It’s a sad stste of affairs.

So you're a maskhole.

His did I know this?
 
At least in the blanket general sense.

5 Questions: Stanford scientists on COVID-19 mask guidelines | News Center | Stanford Medicine

https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1279750/retrieve


Many countries have recommended the use of fabric masks/face coverings for the general public. At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider (see below).

The new guidelines recommend that everyone who comes in close contact with others in crowded or close quarters, such as on a bus or in a store, wear a cloth mask composed of at least three different layers of material. People 60 or older, or those with underlying health conditions, should wear medical masks, such as surgical masks, in public, and physicians and health care providers should wear medical masks in all areas of a hospital, even if the area in which they are working has no COVID-19 patients, according to the organization.


Notice he underlined part.

If social distancing is practiced, it’s not recommended to wear the mask.


How is it thst reasonable people cannot disagree on this?


Also notice, the it’s reommended the mask have 3 layers. Nobody gives a ratsxass if it has three layers. I think the reason is that it’s about signaling your tribal allegiance for many.

Not wearing a mask means you are a filthy deplorable. It’s not about the effectiveness, it’s about who you are if not wearing one. It’s a sad stste of affairs.

"How is it that reasonable people...?" Because it's a terrible (temporary), inconvenience and a violation of their Holy Rights? That's what whining conservatives tell us.
 
In other words wear masks when you expect contact with others.

The problem is common sense isn't a common virtue.

And since you can't force others to social distance you cannot depend on social distance to protect you.


From Wikipedia: Front (west side): "Uncommon Valor Was A Common Virtue" – "Semper Fidelis"



Iwo Jima Memorial
 
In other words wear masks when you expect contact with others.

The problem is common sense isn't a common virtue.

And since you can't force others to social distance you cannot depend on social distance to protect you.
How you got thst from this:

At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence

I don’t understand.
 
And physics.

****ing deep state physics.


At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence
 
"How is it that reasonable people...?" Because it's a terrible (temporary), inconvenience and a violation of their Holy Rights? That's what whining conservatives tell us.

At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence
 
At least in the blanket general sense.

5 Questions: Stanford scientists on COVID-19 mask guidelines | News Center | Stanford Medicine

https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1279750/retrieve


Many countries have recommended the use of fabric masks/face coverings for the general public. At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider (see below).

The new guidelines recommend that everyone who comes in close contact with others in crowded or close quarters, such as on a bus or in a store, wear a cloth mask composed of at least three different layers of material. People 60 or older, or those with underlying health conditions, should wear medical masks, such as surgical masks, in public, and physicians and health care providers should wear medical masks in all areas of a hospital, even if the area in which they are working has no COVID-19 patients, according to the organization.


Notice he underlined part.

If social distancing is practiced, it’s not recommended to wear the mask.


How is it thst reasonable people cannot disagree on this?


Also notice, the it’s reommended the mask have 3 layers. Nobody gives a ratsxass if it has three layers. I think the reason is that it’s about signaling your tribal allegiance for many.

Not wearing a mask means you are a filthy deplorable. It’s not about the effectiveness, it’s about who you are if not wearing one. It’s a sad stste of affairs.

Not wearing a mask shows you have no respect or consideration for the well-being of others around you. And yes, that's deplorable. Why do you think rates of infection and death are falling through the floor in Europe? Did you say it's because we have been sensible and followed distancing guidelines instead of whining about 'rights' being violated? You would be correct. Wear a ****ing mask!
 
At least in the blanket general sense.

5 Questions: Stanford scientists on COVID-19 mask guidelines | News Center | Stanford Medicine

https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1279750/retrieve


Many countries have recommended the use of fabric masks/face coverings for the general public. At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider (see below).

The new guidelines recommend that everyone who comes in close contact with others in crowded or close quarters, such as on a bus or in a store, wear a cloth mask composed of at least three different layers of material. People 60 or older, or those with underlying health conditions, should wear medical masks, such as surgical masks, in public, and physicians and health care providers should wear medical masks in all areas of a hospital, even if the area in which they are working has no COVID-19 patients, according to the organization.


Notice he underlined part.

If social distancing is practiced, it’s not recommended to wear the mask.


How is it thst reasonable people cannot disagree on this?


Also notice, the it’s reommended the mask have 3 layers. Nobody gives a ratsxass if it has three layers. I think the reason is that it’s about signaling your tribal allegiance for many.

Not wearing a mask means you are a filthy deplorable. It’s not about the effectiveness, it’s about who you are if not wearing one. It’s a sad stste of affairs.

I'm not sure what the purpose of this thread is...it's been known for quite some time that wearing a mask is for times when you cannot maintain social distancing. However, droplets from a cough on an unmasked person can travel up to 8', so it may be best to widen that distance.

Laser light experiment shows which types of face masks work best
 
Not wearing a mask shows you have no respect or consideration for the well-being of others around you. And yes, that's deplorable. Wear a ****ing mask! Why do you think rates of infection and death are falling through the floor in Europe? Did you say it's because we have been sensible and followed distancing guidelines instead of whining about 'rights' being violated? You would be correct.
Science denier ^

At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence
 
At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence

You want to take a risk, your choice. Wear a ****ing mask or stay away from people. And what is a "community setting"?
 
Science denier ^

At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence

And I note you have nothing in response to my post except "science denier". Pathetic.
 
At least in the blanket general sense.

5 Questions: Stanford scientists on COVID-19 mask guidelines | News Center | Stanford Medicine

https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1279750/retrieve


Many countries have recommended the use of fabric masks/face coverings for the general public. At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider (see below).

The new guidelines recommend that everyone who comes in close contact with others in crowded or close quarters, such as on a bus or in a store, wear a cloth mask composed of at least three different layers of material. People 60 or older, or those with underlying health conditions, should wear medical masks, such as surgical masks, in public, and physicians and health care providers should wear medical masks in all areas of a hospital, even if the area in which they are working has no COVID-19 patients, according to the organization.


Notice he underlined part.

If social distancing is practiced, it’s not recommended to wear the mask.


How is it thst reasonable people cannot disagree on this?


Also notice, the it’s reommended the mask have 3 layers. Nobody gives a ratsxass if it has three layers. I think the reason is that it’s about signaling your tribal allegiance for many.

Not wearing a mask means you are a filthy deplorable. It’s not about the effectiveness, it’s about who you are if not wearing one. It’s a sad stste of affairs.

So did you read the article you posted?

It says the opposite of what you do, right down to the hyperbole at the end.
 
I'm not sure what the purpose of this thread is...it's been known for quite some time that wearing a mask is for times when you cannot maintain social distancing. However, droplets from a cough on an unmasked person can travel up to 8', so it may be best to widen that distance.

Laser light experiment shows which types of face masks work best

At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence


The purpose to to shame leftist loons that demonize people for not doing something that is not recommended by the science.
 
So did you read the article you posted?

It says the opposite of what you do, right down to the hyperbole at the end.

Did you read the WHO?

At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence
 
At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence


The purpose to to shame leftist loons that demonize people for not doing something that is not recommended by the science.

What is a "community setting"?

I don't think many people are saying to wear a mask when you can maintain the proper distance from others. For instance, when I go to a retail store, I try to maintain the proper distance from others, but it is almost impossible to do it at all times. You may pass by someone in an aisle or even walking in other parts of the store. All it takes is one cough or sneeze and you can be infected.
 
That's what I say. No mask. Just stay the F away from me. Simple
 
Science denier ^

At the present time, the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence

So did you read the article you posted?

It says the opposite of what you do, right down to the hyperbole at the end.

Either he didn't read the complete WHO document or, as with many science deniers, Simple . . . is quote-mining, as anyone might find for themselves - if curious.

. . . taking into account the available studies evaluating pre- and asymptomatic transmission, a growing compendium
of observational evidence on the use of masks by the general public in several countries, individual values and preferences,
as well as the difficulty of physical distancing in many contexts, WHO has updated its guidance to advise that to
prevent COVID-19 transmission effectively in areas of community transmission, governments should encourage the
general public to wear masks
in specific situations and settings as part of a comprehensive approach to suppress
SARS-CoV-2 transmission (
 
Back
Top Bottom