• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

As usual Facts Destroy leftist meme's once again President and VP were not briefed

National security adviser says Trump’s CIA briefer decided not to share Russia bounty intel | Fox News

The NY time fake news story is exposed once again by facts.
All the leftist outrage once again duped by anonymous sources are now exposed.

National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien on Wednesday claimed that President Trump’s CIA briefer made the call not to share with him the intelligence referencing Russia allegedly offering bounties to Afghan militants for killing U.S. soldiers.

Now you go why would they do this? simple.

The intelligence community doesn’t have a consensus,” O’Brien continued. “And as a result, the president’s career CIA briefer decided not to brief him because it was unverified intelligence.”
The comments come after a senior U.S. official who had been briefed on the matter told Fox News earlier this week that the information that the National Security Council had received was based on “several streams of intelligence of concern” with some of it being contradictory and some open to interpretation.

he White House on Monday insisted there is "no consensus" that the intelligence that Russia offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to kill U.S. troops is accurate, which is why, it said, the issue was never flagged to President Trump or Vice President Pence.

eanwhile, O’Brien on Wednesday said that due to the leak of the information, “it may now become impossible to ever get to the bottom of it.”

“We were working very hard on this matter,” O’Brien said. “It may be entirely impossible to get to the bottom of it because someone decided to leak to hurt the president rather than uphold their obligations to the American people.”

once again we need anonymous sources with 0 information leaking fake news and leftist with 0 brains for logical thinking eating it up only to be
disappointed once again.

these leftist are insane at this point.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result.

Lies lies lies and more lies from the party of deceit and BS and corporate bailouts running in the trillions of tax dollars.
 
So let me see if I've got this straight: A CIA briefer made the call not to include the president and the VP on the brief. But the brief existed, regardless. Others in the WH were aware of the Russian bounties intel, and they too decided not to bother the president or VP about it.

Is there anyone who claims there was no intel briefing to anyone regarding bounties?

And the Trump supporters are of the opinion that Trump cannot be held accountable for information his staff withheld from him.

What do you suppose ought to happen to those who decided this information was not worthy of Trump's attention? After all, this is now an embarrassment to the president. Trump was either incompetent, not knowing what his staff knew, or he was indifferent to the information. Either way, he doesn't look good. Heads need to roll for this, IMO. Just go down the cc: list of everyone on the briefing and find out why they kept it from Trump.

That's the problem when the White House is trying to cover for a President who does not want to hear bad news. In addition, Trump's reading capability is limited.
 
Adam Schiff and Pelosi both received the bounty intel and did nothing about it.

they aren't the president and they aren't in charge of foreign policy. But I duly not the schoolyard whataboutism.
 
Truth isn't important. Accurate statements aren't important. The competency of their candidate is unimportant. The ONLY thing that matters is DISCREDIT TRUMP. This is the only real goal, to return the country to the good old Obama days of low rent apartments, 3 minimum wage jobs, ramen every meal, a 15 year old used car, and a houseful of cheap Chinese crap merchandise.

OH BOY!!! I can't wait!!!

The democrats have a very extreme liberal faction running what is going on in the party and with the election. So any story, lie, fabrication, any made up "news" story, any leaked information against the laws of the U.S are all OK with the democrats as they try to win an election with a mentally deficient candidate who has a history of failure to civil rights and likes to fondle and sniff women and little girls. This all for power, and the opportunity to "fundamentally change America", but America doesn't need fundamental change, that was done consistently over the last century and a half as slavery was ended, and rights granted to former slaves, civil rights laws passed to ensure these rights and black men and women elected to the Congress and Presidency of the U.S. Where is America lacking? IN he leadership from black politicians, from the democrat party leadership and from the decline of the nuclear family of black Americans. Those are things we need to work on and can fix if we are willing to admit there is a culltural problem we need to correct. Two parent households, whether white or black are critical to achieving this correction.
 
Our NATO allies were not briefed about the Russian bounties? Are you going to pathetically deny that fact as well?

No intel is a 100% fact. That's why it's called "intel". Maybe even you can comprehend that. What a lightweight.

Every former NSC official that has spoken about this has stated that, in normal times, a President would be briefed on intel as serious as this. If you want to be a child and deny this truth, well then that's you with your lips glued to Trump's lazy, traitorous fat ass.

The White House is in the embarrassing position of having to explain why the President does not read his morning intelligence briefing, or PDB (Presidential Daily Brief). One supporter suggested that the President doesn't have time to read military intelligence and the briefer must make it simple for him.

In another age --meaning a very long time ago -- I was a Marine intelligence officer. I was the S-2 at 11th Marines, an artillery regiment. I am no expert on intelligence, but some things are just basic.

Unfortunately, it would appear that no one in the White House understands the basics of military intelligence.

Intelligence is not hard fact. Intelligence ranges from informed speculation to highly reliable supposition. It is why the source of the intell gives a reliability assessment of the intelligence, low confidence to high confidence.

When the intelligence is verified, it is no longer intelligence. It has become fact.

Here is the important part. If the President waits until intelligence becomes fact, the delay could be disastrous. When Obama gave the execute order for Bin Laden, that was not based factual knowledge of OBL's whereabouts. It was based on intell with high confidence.

Unfortunately, Trump is no ordinary President. His unwillingness to hear or cope with bad news is striking.

The White House insists that intelligence must be verified before it is presented to the President. "There were dissenting opinions within the intelligence community, and it would not be elevated to the President until it was verified." Access Denied

I cannot think of anything more stupid.

The disaster of waiting until intelligence became hard fact has already happened. 80 years ago the President waited for months of intelligence to become fact. The consequence: Our country became embroiled in an apocalypse, the most destructive war in the history of mankind, ending with the dropping of two atomic bombs.

Throughout much of 1941 there was intelligence that Japan will attack the United States. No one was sure where, but the Pacific Fleet based at Pearl Harbor was a very lucrative target for imperial Japan. Neither the President nor the military chiefs of staff acted. With the exception of the aircraft carriers, the Japanese destroyed the Pacific Fleet, Sunday morning, December 7, 1941. World War Two began for the United States.

All because intelligence was not presented to the President until it was verified.
 
So what did they go to jail for? Lying to the FBI. And what were they lying about?

Manafort went to jail for tax crimes. Flynn didnt go to jail but was accused of lying about the content of a call that the transcript shows was legit. No one. I repeat, no one was even charged with collusion/conspiracy/coordination with Russia. No one. Is that starting to sink in yet? I doubt it. No one. There was no collusion. Period. How do we know? After three years of investigation, no one was ever charged. No one. Sinking in yet? Of course it isnt. You believe what you believe in spite of the facts not because of them. Thats why you fell for the collusion hoax. And that is why you continue to fall for it and always will.
 
Our NATO allies were not briefed about the Russian bounties? Are you going to pathetically deny that fact as well?

No intel is a 100% fact. That's why it's called "intel". Maybe even you can comprehend that. What a lightweight.

Every former NSC official that has spoken about this has stated that, in normal times, a President would be briefed on intel as serious as this. If you want to be a child and deny this truth, well then that's you with your lips glued to Trump's lazy, traitorous fat ass.

Another angry, childish rant. That seems to be your thing here. Let me know when you climb out of the sandbox and have something mature to add. Thanks.
 
Manafort went to jail for tax crimes. Flynn didnt go to jail but was accused of lying about the content of a call that the transcript shows was legit. No one. I repeat, no one was even charged with collusion/conspiracy/coordination with Russia. No one. Is that starting to sink in yet? I doubt it. No one. There was no collusion. Period. How do we know? After three years of investigation, no one was ever charged. No one. Sinking in yet? Of course it isnt. You believe what you believe in spite of the facts not because of them. Thats why you fell for the collusion hoax. And that is why you continue to fall for it and always will.

It doesn't matter what they were "charged" with. They lied about their Russian contacts. Pure and simple. That is the main reason why they got in trouble and went to jail. You know it. I know it. Your childish, Repug spinning of the facts changes nothing.

This is why you live in some lunatic alternate universe where a racist and a traitor like Trump is somehow a decent person. And I live in the real world where Trump is simply an asshole racist and a traitor.

But enjoy this world for a couple of more months, bud. Because that mother ****er traitor Trump is going down in November and so is the Nazi Repug Party.
 
Another angry, childish rant. That seems to be your thing here. Let me know when you climb out of the sandbox and have something mature to add. Thanks.

Were are NATO allies not briefed about this? All I hear are Repug crickets.

No facts, no game, no intellect. You got nothin, as always.
 
Adam Schiff and Pelosi both received the bounty intel and did nothing about it.

What did you expect them to do? They cannot give orders or sign executive orders.
 
It doesn't matter what they were "charged" with. They lied about their Russian contacts. Pure and simple. That is the main reason why they got in trouble and went to jail. You know it. I know it. Your childish, Repug spinning of the facts changes nothing.

This is why you live in some lunatic alternate universe where a racist and a traitor like Trump is somehow a decent person. And I live in the real world where Trump is simply an asshole racist and a traitor.

But enjoy this world for a couple of more months, bud. Because that mother ****er traitor Trump is going down in November and so is the Nazi Repug Party.
You know, I dont argue with 911 Truthers because it is pointless. I may have to start doing the same thing with Collusion Truthers.
 
Adam Schiff and Pelosi both received the bounty intel and did nothing about it.

OK, so we're supposed to believe it's important enough to brief the Gang of Eight, which includes Republican leaders, who did nothing, but the President and VP were blissfully ignorant of this plot, and it's all the Democrats' fault!!

Many I love you guys. There really is no bottom to what excuses you'll use to defend Dear Leader. If it wasn't so frightening, it'd be just hilarious.
 
False. We do not know that it happened. And we never will now because some hate filled leftist saw fit to release classified intel to the papers in order to damage the president.

Or it could have been a patriot who's in the WH and is disgusted at what he or she is seeing. And why should we believe the spin from this bunch of incompetents about revealing it now means we cannot ever figure out the truth?

Besides, everyone defending POTUS and the WH here ought to be ashamed. First of all, it's unthinkable that POTUS would be kept in the dark on something like this, verified or not. Second, it's typical of these gutless incompetents in Trump's cabinet to throw the anonymous CIA briefer under the bus. It's not her job to make those calls - she's a nameless, faceless nobody, and instead of the NSA or CIA director or Joint Chiefs - you know, the damn bosses in the corner offices with the fancy titles including members of the cabinet - taking responsibility for supposedly keeping Trump ignorant, they let that crap roll downhill to an underling. Bunch of worthless cowards who throw their staff under the bus when the going gets tough. It's a failure of leadership, and typical of this WH.
 
If he wasnt briefed on it then he had no knowledge of the story. So it actually makes sense that his first reaction would be to call it a hoax.

No, it doesn't make sense to call it a hoax if at that point in time he was still blissfully and completely ignorant of that issue. That's what stupid incompetents do - dismiss something out of 100% ignorance.

Its not like we havent seen this movie before. But if it is something that the Russians were doing, it seems the proper response would be to send our spies after theirs rather than make an international incident out of it.

Well, as a sort of step one, it seems the proper response is to let the CiC know about it. Seems like that's the call of the President when it involves a country like Russia.

FWIW, your Butwhatabout deleted and ignored as stupid drivel.
 
Let's see if I have this right. Trump's National Security Advisor said that the CIA briefer decided on his own not tell Trump about the Russian bounty -- a threat that has been shared with select members of Congress -- and this was reported by the Trump Network, er, I mean Fox News. :2razz:

Good one. Do you have anymore like that?

Yeah, that's the really amazing thing. The DEFENSE is, no, we really didn't bother to tell Trump about this, although everyone else in the high level national security apparatus including Congress was briefed, we purposely kept POTUS and VP blissfully ignorant. FAKE NEWS!!

In a sane world, people making that decision on behalf of the president and VP would be out on their ass in about an hour.
 
Really? What did the PDB say about it. Can you quote it for me.

Your problem with this defense is you'll be run over soon enough. What should alert you to that Mack truck headed your way is NO ONE is denying this part of the story, and Congress will find out if they aren't completely worthless, and then Trump will admit it and thank you for your service as you get run over by that truck.

It's an easy fact to confirm or deny. Just have a WH person in a half dozen agencies say, "No, that story is FALSE. This information has never been included on a PDB, period." Weird that such an easy thing to debunk hasn't been, at all...... Well it would be incredible if the story was false, understandable if true.
 
You know, I dont argue with 911 Truthers because it is pointless. I may have to start doing the same thing with Collusion Truthers.

You pretend that these ****ers didn't go to jail for their association with Russians. Instead, they went to jail for some other bull**** reason that had nothing to do with Russia, according to you.

That's how ****ing ridiculous you are. What a joke. No wonder you still kiss Trump's incompetent traitorous fat ass 4 years later.
 
Your problem with this defense is you'll be run over soon enough. What should alert you to that Mack truck headed your way is NO ONE is denying this part of the story, and Congress will find out if they aren't completely worthless, and then Trump will admit it and thank you for your service as you get run over by that truck.

It's an easy fact to confirm or deny. Just have a WH person in a half dozen agencies say, "No, that story is FALSE. This information has never been included on a PDB, period." Weird that such an easy thing to debunk hasn't been, at all...... Well it would be incredible if the story was false, understandable if true.

This guy is OK with looking like a total idiot next week...as long as he only looks like a Trump ass-kissing half-wit today. He is willing to prostitute himself like that. How pathetic.
 
OK, so we're supposed to believe it's important enough to brief the Gang of Eight, which includes Republican leaders, who did nothing, but the President and VP were blissfully ignorant of this plot, and it's all the Democrats' fault!!

Many I love you guys. There really is no bottom to what excuses you'll use to defend Dear Leader. If it wasn't so frightening, it'd be just hilarious.

First of all you don’t act on rumor and make policy changes - like sniping and killing Russian soldiers. It was in the process of being vetted until it went public and vetting became nearly impossible.
Second of all, the Taliban kills American soldiers without Russia’s help.
Thirdly, what are we doing in year 20 in Afghanistan?
 
There needs to be a full blown investigation on this.

I think Trump was told about the bounties and he was too busy checking his twitter feed to notice.


Then Putin, the ex KGB agent, noticed Trump didn't respond to the bounties, and Putin leaked the bounty information knowing it would hurt Trump and hurt American's faith in our democratic system.
 
First of all you don’t act on rumor and make policy changes - like sniping and killing Russian soldiers. It was in the process of being vetted until it went public and vetting became nearly impossible.
Second of all, the Taliban kills American soldiers without Russia’s help.
Thirdly, what are we doing in year 20 in Afghanistan?

Nope. It was already briefed to our NATO allies. It was in the President's PDB on 27 Feb 2020. Intel that hasn't been vetted doesn't make it all the way to the president's PDB. Obviously, the intel has validity or it would not have gotten this far. I guess Obama should not have gone after bin Laden, since that intel was only 50/50 in that case. You have no idea what you are talking about.

This is all Repug nonsense to try to distract from the fact that Trump is either A) a traitor who doesn't care about American troops and this country or B) an incompetent idiot to lazy to read his PBD. Those are the choices. Pick one.
 
Back
Top Bottom