• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

As usual Facts Destroy leftist meme's once again President and VP were not briefed

L

ludin

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
57,470
Reaction score
14,587
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
National security adviser says Trump’s CIA briefer decided not to share Russia bounty intel | Fox News

The NY time fake news story is exposed once again by facts.
All the leftist outrage once again duped by anonymous sources are now exposed.

National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien on Wednesday claimed that President Trump’s CIA briefer made the call not to share with him the intelligence referencing Russia allegedly offering bounties to Afghan militants for killing U.S. soldiers.

Now you go why would they do this? simple.

The intelligence community doesn’t have a consensus,” O’Brien continued. “And as a result, the president’s career CIA briefer decided not to brief him because it was unverified intelligence.”
The comments come after a senior U.S. official who had been briefed on the matter told Fox News earlier this week that the information that the National Security Council had received was based on “several streams of intelligence of concern” with some of it being contradictory and some open to interpretation.

he White House on Monday insisted there is "no consensus" that the intelligence that Russia offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to kill U.S. troops is accurate, which is why, it said, the issue was never flagged to President Trump or Vice President Pence.

eanwhile, O’Brien on Wednesday said that due to the leak of the information, “it may now become impossible to ever get to the bottom of it.”

“We were working very hard on this matter,” O’Brien said. “It may be entirely impossible to get to the bottom of it because someone decided to leak to hurt the president rather than uphold their obligations to the American people.”

once again we need anonymous sources with 0 information leaking fake news and leftist with 0 brains for logical thinking eating it up only to be
disappointed once again.

these leftist are insane at this point.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result.
 
Truth isn't important. Accurate statements aren't important. The competency of their candidate is unimportant. The ONLY thing that matters is DISCREDIT TRUMP. This is the only real goal, to return the country to the good old Obama days of low rent apartments, 3 minimum wage jobs, ramen every meal, a 15 year old used car, and a houseful of cheap Chinese crap merchandise.

OH BOY!!! I can't wait!!!
 
ludin said:
National security adviser says Trump’s CIA briefer decided not to share Russia bounty intel | Fox News

The NY time fake news story is exposed once again by facts.
All the leftist outrage once again duped by anonymous sources are now exposed.

National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien on Wednesday claimed that President Trump’s CIA briefer made the call not to share with him the intelligence referencing Russia allegedly offering bounties to Afghan militants for killing U.S. soldiers.

Now you go why would they do this? simple.

The intelligence community doesn’t have a consensus,” O’Brien continued. “And as a result, the president’s career CIA briefer decided not to brief him because it was unverified intelligence.”
The comments come after a senior U.S. official who had been briefed on the matter told Fox News earlier this week that the information that the National Security Council had received was based on “several streams of intelligence of concern” with some of it being contradictory and some open to interpretation.

he White House on Monday insisted there is "no consensus" that the intelligence that Russia offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to kill U.S. troops is accurate, which is why, it said, the issue was never flagged to President Trump or Vice President Pence.

eanwhile, O’Brien on Wednesday said that due to the leak of the information, “it may now become impossible to ever get to the bottom of it.”

“We were working very hard on this matter,” O’Brien said. “It may be entirely impossible to get to the bottom of it because someone decided to leak to hurt the president rather than uphold their obligations to the American people.”

once again we need anonymous sources with 0 information leaking fake news and leftist with 0 brains for logical thinking eating it up only to be
disappointed once again.

these leftist are insane at this point.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result.
Click to expand...

And you're going to believe him why? Because he's a Trump employee? Good grief man, get some fortitude.
 
ludin said:
National security adviser says Trump’s CIA briefer decided not to share Russia bounty intel | Fox News

The NY time fake news story is exposed once again by facts.
All the leftist outrage once again duped by anonymous sources are now exposed.

National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien on Wednesday claimed that President Trump’s CIA briefer made the call not to share with him the intelligence referencing Russia allegedly offering bounties to Afghan militants for killing U.S. soldiers.

Now you go why would they do this? simple.

The intelligence community doesn’t have a consensus,” O’Brien continued. “And as a result, the president’s career CIA briefer decided not to brief him because it was unverified intelligence.”
The comments come after a senior U.S. official who had been briefed on the matter told Fox News earlier this week that the information that the National Security Council had received was based on “several streams of intelligence of concern” with some of it being contradictory and some open to interpretation.

he White House on Monday insisted there is "no consensus" that the intelligence that Russia offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to kill U.S. troops is accurate, which is why, it said, the issue was never flagged to President Trump or Vice President Pence.

eanwhile, O’Brien on Wednesday said that due to the leak of the information, “it may now become impossible to ever get to the bottom of it.”

“We were working very hard on this matter,” O’Brien said. “It may be entirely impossible to get to the bottom of it because someone decided to leak to hurt the president rather than uphold their obligations to the American people.”

once again we need anonymous sources with 0 information leaking fake news and leftist with 0 brains for logical thinking eating it up only to be
disappointed once again.

these leftist are insane at this point.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result.
Click to expand...

It's not really insanity, it is the methodology of propaganda.

I've made this point time and time again over the last 4 years.

Even if something is a lie, if you repeat it over and over again people will begin to believe it.

I've also posted these quotes attributable to Joseph Goebbels.

1. If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself.

2. A lie told once remains a lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.

3. The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.

(And my personal favorite):

4. It would not be impossible to prove with sufficient repetition and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in fact a circle. They are mere words, and words can be molded until they clothe ideas and disguise.

Joseph Goebbels
Click to expand...

Many Americans were shocked to their core when Trump won the election in 2020. After all, they had been convinced it was a complete impossibility...that Ms. Clinton was a shoe-in.

Even the MSM was stunned by the failure of their own predictions.

This shock evolved into the idea that it had to be a cheat, that Trump did not win fair and square.

The MSM, and any forces opposing the Administration have been building on that foundation for the last 3.5 years.
 
Last edited:
Captain Adverse said:
It's not really insanity, it is the methodology of propaganda.

I've made this point time and time again over the last 4 years.

Even if something is a lie, if you repeat it over and over again people will begin to believe it.

I've also posted these quotes attributable to Joseph Goebbels.
Click to expand...


Good for you, Godwin a pro Trump thread out of the gate!


View attachment 67286059
 
ludin said:
National security adviser says Trump’s CIA briefer decided not to share Russia bounty intel | Fox News

The NY time fake news story is exposed once again by facts.
All the leftist outrage once again duped by anonymous sources are now exposed.

National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien on Wednesday claimed that President Trump’s CIA briefer made the call not to share with him the intelligence referencing Russia allegedly offering bounties to Afghan militants for killing U.S. soldiers.

Now you go why would they do this? simple.

The intelligence community doesn’t have a consensus,” O’Brien continued. “And as a result, the president’s career CIA briefer decided not to brief him because it was unverified intelligence.”
The comments come after a senior U.S. official who had been briefed on the matter told Fox News earlier this week that the information that the National Security Council had received was based on “several streams of intelligence of concern” with some of it being contradictory and some open to interpretation.

he White House on Monday insisted there is "no consensus" that the intelligence that Russia offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to kill U.S. troops is accurate, which is why, it said, the issue was never flagged to President Trump or Vice President Pence.

eanwhile, O’Brien on Wednesday said that due to the leak of the information, “it may now become impossible to ever get to the bottom of it.”

“We were working very hard on this matter,” O’Brien said. “It may be entirely impossible to get to the bottom of it because someone decided to leak to hurt the president rather than uphold their obligations to the American people.”

once again we need anonymous sources with 0 information leaking fake news and leftist with 0 brains for logical thinking eating it up only to be
disappointed once again.

these leftist are insane at this point.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result.
Click to expand...

Okay, let us say that the president and the VP were not informed, but we know the White House knew. So why the hell did they let the president gift Putin with six subservient phone calls, cancel the G7 conference here in the US because the other leaders of the G7 countries would not include Putin in the meeting and begin to remove our troops from Germany? Why would they do that? We read that white house staff are afraid that trump will scream at them if they bring any bad news about his buddy Putin and that several staffers have been fired for doing so. So whose fault is it that he was not briefed about Putin's bounty on our troops? And why is Trump still telling us the whole thing is a hoax, even though everyone knows it is the truth? We do not know the whole truth about this situation and with trump blocking every effort from the congress to get information from the White House and the parts of the government he controls, we will probably not find out until he is out of office.
 
The AntiDonald said:
And you're going to believe him why? Because he's a Trump employee? Good grief man, get some fortitude.
Click to expand...

And who is it you believe? Answer: you have no idea. You dont know who the source is so you have no idea as to his credibility. You will just believe any negative story about Trump no matter what it is and apply zero in the way of critical thought.
 
Team Trump is utterly untrustworthy. They'll even deny that protesters and pastors being gassed on video were gassed. Pretty much every defensive thing they say turns out to be a lie.

Why should I trust someone on Team Trump? Why should I trust Trumpists when they themselves dismiss out of hand anything any source on the left says?





At any rate, I cannot imagine that there are many people for him this story was the deciding factor. I'm not sure what Biden would have to do to cause me to vote Trump at this point, and I'd rather not think up a list.

If I had only decided to oppose Trump because of this story, I'd need to go get my head checked.
 
Fletch said:
And who is it you believe? Answer: you have no idea. You dont know who the source is so you have no idea as to his credibility. You will just believe any negative story about Trump no matter what it is and apply zero in the way of critical thought.
Click to expand...

Well, when one's credibility has fallen as low as the Trump administration's thanks to endless lies and deceit, I tend to believe the opposite of whatever they say, especially if what they are saying suggests that they have any credibility at all.
 
Mr Person said:
Team Trump is utterly untrustworthy. They'll even deny that protesters and pastors being gassed on video were gassed. Pretty much every defensive thing they say turns out to be a lie.

Why should I trust someone on Team Trump? Why should I trust Trumpists when they themselves dismiss out of hand anything any source on the left says?
Click to expand...
Do you have evidence he was briefed? Do you even have evidence that the story about the Russians has even been verified? The answer to both is no, of course but you hate Trump and that is all that matters.





At any rate, I cannot imagine that there are many people for him this story was the deciding factor. I'm not sure what Biden would have to do to cause me to vote Trump at this point, and I'd rather not think up a list.
Click to expand...
Oh sure. Like you are on the fence.

If I had only decided to oppose Trump because of this story, I'd need to go get my head checked.
Click to expand...
That might be in order anyway.
 
Captain Adverse said:
It's not really insanity, it is the methodology of propaganda.
Click to expand...

Says poster who claimed that photos and videos of police slashing tires were not evidence of police slashing tires....

...right up until the police spokesman said the police splashed tires.

:roll:




Captain Adverse said:
Joseph Goebbels.
Click to expand...

Well, if you must Godwin things:

"What you are seeing and hearing is not what's happening"

Who said it: Goebbels or Trump?
 
lwf said:
Well, when one's credibility has fallen as low as the Trump administration's thanks to endless lies and deceit, I tend to believe the opposite of whatever they say, especially if what they are saying suggests that they have any credibility at all.
Click to expand...

I know. You guys have your minds made up before any facts hit the table. Thats why its so pointless to even engage most of you.
 
ludin said:
National security adviser says Trump’s CIA briefer decided not to share Russia bounty intel | Fox News

The NY time fake news story is exposed once again by facts.
All the leftist outrage once again duped by anonymous sources are now exposed.

National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien on Wednesday claimed that President Trump’s CIA briefer made the call not to share with him the intelligence referencing Russia allegedly offering bounties to Afghan militants for killing U.S. soldiers.

Now you go why would they do this? simple.

The intelligence community doesn’t have a consensus,” O’Brien continued. “And as a result, the president’s career CIA briefer decided not to brief him because it was unverified intelligence.”
The comments come after a senior U.S. official who had been briefed on the matter told Fox News earlier this week that the information that the National Security Council had received was based on “several streams of intelligence of concern” with some of it being contradictory and some open to interpretation.

he White House on Monday insisted there is "no consensus" that the intelligence that Russia offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to kill U.S. troops is accurate, which is why, it said, the issue was never flagged to President Trump or Vice President Pence.

eanwhile, O’Brien on Wednesday said that due to the leak of the information, “it may now become impossible to ever get to the bottom of it.”

“We were working very hard on this matter,” O’Brien said. “It may be entirely impossible to get to the bottom of it because someone decided to leak to hurt the president rather than uphold their obligations to the American people.”

once again we need anonymous sources with 0 information leaking fake news and leftist with 0 brains for logical thinking eating it up only to be
disappointed once again.

these leftist are insane at this point.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result.
Click to expand...

” O’Brien continued. “And as a result, the president’s career CIA briefer decided not to brief him because it was unverified intelligence.”

Who is trump's personal CIA briefer? Did we not just have numerous IGs fired? Haven't heard a word from he liar in chief on firing his CIA personal briefer.

The person who allowed American men and women be targeted by bounties. I may be wrong but isn't trump the boss of these people, has donald completely lost control of his cabinet?
 
Fletch said:
I know. You guys have your minds made up before any facts hit the table. Thats why its so pointless to even engage most of you.
Click to expand...

Simple, no matter how you slice this it's either:

Bounties were placed on American men and women under trump's watch, that's all anyone needs to know.

trump is culpable and his incompetent leadership lead to:

Trump has no handle on the advisors around him, or

Trump doesn't pay attention to Americans safety through intelligence

Trump simply is lying about this.
 
ludin said:
National security adviser says Trump’s CIA briefer decided not to share Russia bounty intel | Fox News

The NY time fake news story is exposed once again by facts.
All the leftist outrage once again duped by anonymous sources are now exposed.

National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien on Wednesday claimed that President Trump’s CIA briefer made the call not to share with him the intelligence referencing Russia allegedly offering bounties to Afghan militants for killing U.S. soldiers.

Now you go why would they do this? simple.

The intelligence community doesn’t have a consensus,” O’Brien continued. “And as a result, the president’s career CIA briefer decided not to brief him because it was unverified intelligence.”
The comments come after a senior U.S. official who had been briefed on the matter told Fox News earlier this week that the information that the National Security Council had received was based on “several streams of intelligence of concern” with some of it being contradictory and some open to interpretation.

he White House on Monday insisted there is "no consensus" that the intelligence that Russia offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to kill U.S. troops is accurate, which is why, it said, the issue was never flagged to President Trump or Vice President Pence.

eanwhile, O’Brien on Wednesday said that due to the leak of the information, “it may now become impossible to ever get to the bottom of it.”

“We were working very hard on this matter,” O’Brien said. “It may be entirely impossible to get to the bottom of it because someone decided to leak to hurt the president rather than uphold their obligations to the American people.”

once again we need anonymous sources with 0 information leaking fake news and leftist with 0 brains for logical thinking eating it up only to be
disappointed once again.

these leftist are insane at this point.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result.
Click to expand...

You do realize Trump said this is a "hoax", correct? That is not the same thing as what O'Brien is saying. So which one of them is lying? Or are they both lying?

Of course, we should believe what Trump's lapdog National Security Advisor says, by all means. There is no way that he could possibly be lying. That's unthinkable.

So why is Trump believable, but the media is not? So why is this O'Brien lapdog guy believable, but the media is not?

Better yet -- Why is this O'Brien guy believable, but former NSA John Bolton is not believable? Just two years ago, idiot Repugs adored Bolton. Now he is public enemy #1. You Repugs have no dignity or self-respect the way that you prostitute yourselves for Trump. It's not only pathetic as ****, but downright creepy, cult-like behavor.

Furthermore, the Russian bounty intel was in Trump's PDB on 27 Feb 2020. Trump says he wasn't aware of this intel until a few days ago. Which means Trump didn't read his PDB on 27 Feb 2020 (big surprise there). Which means Trump committed dereliction of duty.

In other words -- Any way that pathetic Repugs like you try to spin this bull****, it still makes Trump look like a total incompetent ****-up or a total traitor or both. You can't win, no matter what. Have some self-respect and give it up.
 
Last edited:
Sand Castle said:
Simple, no matter how you slice this it's either:

Bounties were placed on American men and women under trump's watch, that's all anyone needs to know.

trump is culpable and his incompetent leadership lead to:

Trump has no handle on the advisors around him, or

Trump doesn't pay attention to Americans safety through intelligence

Trump simply is lying about this.
Click to expand...

Thats your hackish conclusion that precedes any actual facts or evidence. Which makes it worthless.
 
Fletch said:
Thats your hackish conclusion that precedes any actual facts or evidence. Which makes it worthless.
Click to expand...

So please give us your rational explanation. The Russian bounty information was in Trump's PDB on 27 Feb 2020. No one is denying that, not even Trump's idiot press secretary.

Trump said he didn't know about this until a few days ago. Which means he didn't read his PDB on 27 Feb 2020 (no surprise there). That is pure negligence, pure dereliction of duty.

So you provide an explanation as to why Trump is not an incompetent ****-up who is too lazy to read his PDB.
 
The AntiDonald said:
And you're going to believe him why? Because he's a Trump employee? Good grief man, get some fortitude.
Click to expand...

facts do not care about your feelings.
i know you are butt hurt again by being fooled by fake news stories and anonymous sources but that is your own issue not mine.
You really need to do more research into facts vs EMO ranting that will improve your knowledge and posting by 100%.

You should have waited for all the facts before once again jumping on what anonymous sources say that have no facts or evidence to support themselves.
 
Rexedgar said:
Good for you, Godwin a pro Trump thread out of the gate!
Click to expand...

No it is called facts you should probably you know acknowledge the facts of what actually happen not that you will.
leftism doesn't allow for facts which is the entire problem to begin with.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom