- Joined
- Jul 19, 2014
- Messages
- 62,963
- Reaction score
- 27,366
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Just to point out, the Hitler side was photoshopped for him to hold the bible.
Did you see Trump slink and defeat-hover around after reporters asked him questions during the photo op? He just sorta bumbled around like he wanted to answer but couldnt thinnk of anything. And just sorta slowly walked off. It looked super odd.
I don't think there's anything Trump can do or not do that wouldn't unleash a barrage of insults and accusations. Nobody really knows what he was thinking when he went to the church, despite all the cynical speculation. Personally, I think he just wanted to show the country that the church was still standing, but who knows?? Talk about a horrible job!! Every little dinky thing he does is analyzed ad nauseum with all kinds of vile speculation as to his motives. Who cares why he went there?? I wish people would focus more on policies, and less on speculative drivel. If people focused on his policies, they could make a coherent argument why he should or shouldn't be reelected. Thanks!!
Post the video evidence of peaceful protesters being shot and gassed. I'd like to join you in denouncing such behavior.
The thing that tipped him over the edge was the viral hashtag #BunkerBitch. People on Twitter picked it up fast and spread it like wildfire. That roasted Trump's ass particularly after he and Fox had been repeating the 'Joe Biden 'hiding in his basement' lie for weeks. He had to make some kind of public display and all he did was inflame Christians everywhere and just returned back to the safety of his bunker afterwards.
The hashtag has even been turned into cute t-shirts and the term is still trending on Twitter.
I would suggest that much of what you are seeing now with rubber bullets and tear gas involves PRESERVING freedom, not limiting it.
100% what that photo op was for.
And showing the church was still standing required using police brutality against peaceful protestors?
"Sir, is that your Bible?"
"It's a Bible."
It was one of most awkward moments in a presidency filled with awkward moments during the most awkward photo op I've ever seen.
There you go my friend. Plenty of other sources out there if you don't like this one.
Uh, it's not police brutality if people won't get out of the way on a thoroughfare. If they won't get the heck out of the way, then those whose job it is to enforce civility have to take some rather strong measures to move them out of the way. For example, if a bunch of people didn't like you and were blocking the entry to your business or your home or even your church so you couldn't have access, would you prefer the police do nothing to help you?? Look, protesters can protest legally, but there shouldn't be an assumption that if they block access or traffic, even foot traffic, that that's simply their privilege, while the people they're blocking have no rights. It doesn't work that way!!
Hmmmm…
1. The President does not need anyone's permission to do what he did.
I didn't see any "peaceful" protesters, just the ones who refused to disperse.
Feel free to show video of peaceful protesters sitting in a circle singing love songs and cuddling with stuffed bears.
I didn't see any "peaceful" protesters, just the ones who refused to disperse.
Feel free to show video of peaceful protesters sitting in a circle singing love songs and cuddling with stuffed bears.
Incorrect on two counts. First, St. John's Episcopal Church and it’s grounds are not public property and he had no permission from the Diocese to be there. The Bishop made abundantly clear that he would not have been given that permission. He was trespassing. Second, the Constitution doesn’t place any qualifiers on the right to peacefully assemble. He violated the Constitutional rights of peaceful protestors to trespass for a photo op.
So if Obama had ordered DC police to have Tea Party protesters arbitrarily dispersed so he could have a photo-op, then the police used rubber bullets and tear gas on them, you would have supported Obama?
Lafayette Park is not a "thoroughfare". Your post fails on its very first sentence. The rest can thus be summarily dismissed without comment.
For now, Trump isn’t just any American, he is our president and his words matter far more than any other American. He is very aware of that fact, and has used the power of the mic to create/increase divisions among Americans for his entire time in office.Hmmmm…
1. The President does not need anyone's permission to do what he did.
2. Like any other American, he retains the right to express his opinions and views.
3. The President made reasonable comments condemning the damages to the church, other national monuments, and the city in general.
4. The Bishop also has the right to express an opinion.
This is still America folks; non-violent freedom of expression is how things are, and should remain.
The reader is also free to express theirs. :shrug:
Perhaps you need to look up the definition of a thoroughfare. It is a "a road or path forming a route between two places." My use of the word thoroughfare was deliberate. The park is a public place that by it's public establishment denotes the reasonable assumption that it is legal to move from point A to point B unhindered. I certainly would not expect you to comment on the rest of my post. Thanks!!