• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Blacks and crime

Termn8or

Banned
Joined
Apr 4, 2020
Messages
3,022
Reaction score
538
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Certainly one has to mourn the killing in Minneapolis, and the officer should have been indicted.

But a huge mythology has been created about race and crime by Academics, Race Hustles and the corrupt liberal MSM.

Facts don't matter to the academic victimology narrative.

Far from destroying the black body, whites are the overwhelming target of interracial violence. Between 2012 and 2015, blacks committed 85.5 percent of all black-white interracial violent victimizations (excluding interracial homicide, which is also disproportionately black-on-white).

That works out to 540,360 felonious assaults on whites. Whites committed 14.4 percent of all interracial violent victimization, or 91,470 felonious assaults on blacks.

Blacks are less than 13 percent of the national population.
The Terrifying Collapse of The Rule of Law Across The Country
 
Certainly one has to mourn the killing in Minneapolis, and the officer should have been indicted.

But a huge mythology has been created about race and crime by Academics, Race Hustles and the corrupt liberal MSM.

How many LEOs of color killed un-armed white people?
 
Certainly one has to mourn the killing in Minneapolis, and the officer should have been indicted.

But a huge mythology has been created about race and crime by Academics, Race Hustles and the corrupt liberal MSM.

dude this is not breaking news or msm. Your post has been reported.
 
dude this is not breaking news or msm. Your post has been reported.

It was published May 31st, 2020.....pretty sure that fits the parameters. Just because you disagree with the premise doesn't mean it's wrong.
 
How many LEOs of color killed un-armed white people?

Curious question, do you think the reaction would be this.....severe, (not sure what word to use) if the officer was black or asian or hispanic?
 
Certainly one has to mourn the killing in Minneapolis, and the officer should have been indicted.

But a huge mythology has been created about race and crime by Academics, Race Hustles and the corrupt liberal MSM.

Your bull**** stats about black on white crime have been debunked as just more propaganda to paint blacks as dangerous criminals.

The Biggest Lie in the White Supremacist Propaganda Playbook: Unraveling the Truth About ‘Black-on-White Crime' | Southern Poverty Law Center
 
Last edited:
Curious question, do you think the reaction would be this.....severe, (not sure what word to use) if the officer was black or asian or hispanic?

Yeah, I think the reaction would be “severe.”
 
Your bull**** stats about black on white crime have been debunked as just more propaganda to paint blacks as dangerous criminals.

The Biggest Lie in the White Supremacist Propaganda Playbook: Unraveling the Truth About ‘Black-on-White Crime' | Southern Poverty Law Center

Your article doesn't contradict anything from the OP source. All it does, is weave together a long, contrived hodgepodge of the history of anecdotes like Trump's tweet, and then goes on to describe the dissemination of black-on-white crime statistics as 'dangerous hate'.

Let's face facts; no liberal in this country wants the FBI to release comprehensive detailed information about interracial crime. They'd rather keep the door shut, and not know what's inside.
 
Certainly one has to mourn the killing in Minneapolis, and the officer should have been indicted.

But a huge mythology has been created about race and crime by Academics, Race Hustles and the corrupt liberal MSM.

Do you only use Right Wing sources?

Opposition
In spring 2017, a protest group announced plans to "shut down" Mac Donald's speech on the Black Lives Matter movement at a college campus in California, claiming that she is racist, fascist, and anti-black.[25] On April 7, around 250 protesters surrounded audience members and prevented them from entering the building where she was speaking at Claremont McKenna College, whose president, Hiram Chodosh, afterward said, "Based on the judgment of the Claremont Police Department, we jointly concluded that any forced interventions or arrests would have created unsafe conditions for students, faculty, staff, and guests." Mac Donald ultimately gave the talk to a small audience in the Marian Miner Cook Athenaeum that was live-streamed on Claremont McKenna's website. Chodosh claimed that "the effort to silence her voice effectively amplified it to a much larger audience.

Heather Mac Donald - Wikipedia

Manhattan Institute for Policy Research - Media Bias/Fact Check
 
Actually, you are wrong, the article YOU linked, literally says that the STATS are right, but the interpretation of them is flawed, not the stats themselves.

Most crime is intra-racial not interracial. So, yes, it's bull****.
 
Most crime is intra-racial not interracial. So, yes, it's bull****.

You're basing that on homicides by the way, not the totality of violent interracial crime, including sex crimes.


Toodles.
 
She has degrees from Yale and Stanford, but because she's a conservative, her options for grants and employment are of course going to be limited to conservative think tanks or NGOs. Is this news?

I use sources that are accurate and honest, which rarely include the corrupt liberal MSM.

Do you have a problem with facts and honesty?

Or do they make you uncomfortable?

I prefer facts and honesty. You tend to rely on Right Wing Nut sources that dishonestly and routinely slant their published messages. Unlike some of our DP members , I do not relish rhetoric spewed from racists, fascists and anti-Black proponents.
 
I prefer facts and honesty. You tend to rely on Right Wing Nut sources that dishonestly and routinely slant their published messages. Unlike some of our DP members , I do not relish rhetoric spewed from racists, fascists and anti-Black proponents.

^ I didn't score a touchdown in the first quarter. I quit.
 
I prefer facts and honesty. You tend to rely on Right Wing Nut sources that dishonestly and routinely slant their published messages. Unlike some of our DP members , I do not relish rhetoric spewed from racists, fascists and anti-Black proponents.

BTW- "The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst."The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."

Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia

No Yale or Stanford credentials for these hacks.
 
Back
Top Bottom