There is no respect intended in your remark. From the article.
Furman’s case begins with the premise that the 2020 pandemic-triggered economic collapse is categorically different than the Great Depression or the Great Recession, which both had slow, grinding recoveries. Instead, he believes, the way to think about the current economic drop-off, at least in the first two phases, is more like what happens to a thriving economy during and after a natural disaster: a quick and steep decline in economic activity followed by a quick and steep rebound.
That's in lay-speak, but it makes sense to treat an epidemic as a natural disaster, rather than a normal economic cycle. Furman has the chops to back it up. What have you got?