• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump and Pence Vote by mail a federal House GOP official voted twice not in his district last time

Razoo

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2017
Messages
24,476
Reaction score
7,808
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Shouldn't a capitol hill house member know where his voting district is? One dude apparently thought fraudulent voting is okay.

President Donald Trump on Tuesday alarmed pro-democracy advocates once again by elevating his attacks on voting rights by falsely claiming that mail-in ballots are inherently "rigged" and suggested the results of the November general election would be illegitimate if a vote-by-mail system is used.

The president—who has long railed against supposed "voter fraud" despite multiple studies showing cases of fraudulent voting are "vanishingly rare" and nowhere near common enough to swing election results—took aim in his tweets at California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who issued an executive order earlier this month to send mail-in ballots to every registered voter in the state for the November election.

Trump tweeted that the order is unjust as it will allow "anyone living in the state," including people who "have never even thought of voting before" to cast ballots in the presidential election, suggesting that mobilizing first-time voters is a suspicious activity.
 
Another thread crying about Trump... spare me.
 
I'd much rather have voting by IP address. Similar to voting on polls here.

Much easier to replicate a ballot on the streets.
 
Shouldn't a capitol hill house member know where his voting district is? One dude apparently thought fraudulent voting is okay.

President Donald Trump on Tuesday alarmed pro-democracy advocates once again by elevating his attacks on voting rights by falsely claiming that mail-in ballots are inherently "rigged" and suggested the results of the November general election would be illegitimate if a vote-by-mail system is used.

The president—who has long railed against supposed "voter fraud" despite multiple studies showing cases of fraudulent voting are "vanishingly rare" and nowhere near common enough to swing election results—took aim in his tweets at California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who issued an executive order earlier this month to send mail-in ballots to every registered voter in the state for the November election.

Trump tweeted that the order is unjust as it will allow "anyone living in the state," including people who "have never even thought of voting before" to cast ballots in the presidential election, suggesting that mobilizing first-time voters is a suspicious activity.

Have a link for this official who twice voted out of district?
 
why can't Tweety and Palpatine show up, stand in line, and get their hoax COVID like they want the rest of us to risk? we can even limit their polling places so the line is really long and cozy, just like Republicans love. you know, to make them feel more at home.

****ing assholes.
 
Shouldn't a capitol hill house member know where his voting district is? One dude apparently thought fraudulent voting is okay.

President Donald Trump on Tuesday alarmed pro-democracy advocates once again by elevating his attacks on voting rights by falsely claiming that mail-in ballots are inherently "rigged" and suggested the results of the November general election would be illegitimate if a vote-by-mail system is used.

The president—who has long railed against supposed "voter fraud" despite multiple studies showing cases of fraudulent voting are "vanishingly rare" and nowhere near common enough to swing election results—took aim in his tweets at California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who issued an executive order earlier this month to send mail-in ballots to every registered voter in the state for the November election.

Trump tweeted that the order is unjust as it will allow "anyone living in the state," including people who "have never even thought of voting before" to cast ballots in the presidential election, suggesting that mobilizing first-time voters is a suspicious activity.

I think Trump and others should read this:

Which Party Would Benefit Most From Voting by Mail? It's Complicated.

Which Party Would Benefit Most From Voting by Mail? It'''s Complicated.

Voting by mail might actually benefit the Republicans.
 
Have a link for this official who twice voted out of district?

You won't give a sh-t however this dude has been raked over the coals and likely will lose his seat. Trump lies, the party lies which make them criminal. Conservatives scream about fraudulent voting to pull the cameras away from them
as they commit crimes.
 
Shouldn't a capitol hill house member know where his voting district is? One dude apparently thought fraudulent voting is okay.

President Donald Trump on Tuesday alarmed pro-democracy advocates once again by elevating his attacks on voting rights by falsely claiming that mail-in ballots are inherently "rigged" and suggested the results of the November general election would be illegitimate if a vote-by-mail system is used.

The president—who has long railed against supposed "voter fraud" despite multiple studies showing cases of fraudulent voting are "vanishingly rare" and nowhere near common enough to swing election results—took aim in his tweets at California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who issued an executive order earlier this month to send mail-in ballots to every registered voter in the state for the November election.

Trump tweeted that the order is unjust as it will allow "anyone living in the state," including people who "have never even thought of voting before" to cast ballots in the presidential election, suggesting that mobilizing first-time voters is a suspicious activity.

Was I supposed to have gotten a cup of Kool-aid to drink while I was reading your post?
 
It all boils down to the same thing, Republicans know their future is better with less people voting.
 

Steve Watkins (R-KS), a first-term lawmaker who has faced allegations of sexual predation and falsified credentials, may have committed voter fraud and perjury, according to an investigation by the Topeka Capital-Journal published on Tuesday. The outlet claimed that Watkins repeatedly listed his legal residence as a UPS store.
GOP congressman may have committed voter fraud with wrong address
americanindependent.com/steve-watkins-gop-congressman-voter-fraud-ups-store-legal-residence-kansas-republicans/
 
Another thread crying about Trump... spare me.

You can always stop reading them or commenting in them. Apparently you lack the proper restraint.
 
It isn’t clear where the congressman physically resided in Kansas after August nor what Topeka precinct he was legally qualified to be part of when voting in November. By asserting his place of residence to be the UPS Store, Watkins left the Topeka City Council’s 5th District for the city council’s 8th District. He then cast a November ballot in an 8th District contest decided by 13 votes.

Hey I notice some fraudulent voting activity by a North Carolina Republican ........
 
It isn’t clear where the congressman physically resided in Kansas after August nor what Topeka precinct he was legally qualified to be part of when voting in November. By asserting his place of residence to be the UPS Store, Watkins left the Topeka City Council’s 5th District for the city council’s 8th District. He then cast a November ballot in an 8th District contest decided by 13 votes.

Hey I notice some fraudulent voting activity by a North Carolina Republican ........

he Republican candidate at the center of a months-long investigation into election fraud in a North Carolina congressional race won't be a candidate for the upcoming new election that was ordered last week.

In a statement, Republican Mark Harris cited health concerns and upcoming surgery as one reason he won't run again in the yet-to-be-scheduled race.

New Election Called In North Carolina House Race


After last November's election, Harris appeared to have a 905-vote lead over Democrat Dan McCready. But then the state declined to certify the race after allegations surfaced that an operative Harris had employed, McCrae Dowless, was illegally collecting absentee ballots.

Voters came forward to say that Dowless or people working for him had picked up their absentee ballots, which is illegal in North Carolina, and that they worked to avoid the State Board of Elections from finding out.

GOP Candidate's Son Says He Warned Of Potential Illegal Activity In N.C. Election

GOP Candidate's Son Says He Warned Of Potential Illegal Activity In N.C. Election
Harris had maintained since Election Day that he didn't know about any wrongdoing. But after emotional testimony from one of his sons during a four-day hearing of the State Board of Elections last week cast doubt on his denials, the former Baptist pastor finally acknowledged a new election was necessary.
 
I'd much rather have voting by IP address. Similar to voting on polls here.

Much easier to replicate a ballot on the streets.
Do you realize that there are millions of people who live somewhere in the US who share NAT'ted IP addresses? They don't get their own, not really. The one shared with the world is for the router itself. In some communities, especially those apartments that are giving wifi as part of your lease, they have one big router with private subnets. In fact, this has proven to be an issue with gaming because some games/gaming networks ban based on IPs, resulting in people who weren't doing anything wrong to deserve a ban also getting banned simply because these companies are being lazy.

And some people in families share computers/devices, even among adults. Others can in fact easily hack into your wifi for their own IP.

There are also other reasons this would not work.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
I'd much rather have voting by IP address. Similar to voting on polls here.

Much easier to replicate a ballot on the streets.

That’s not workable or secure. Voting online would need to use digital certificates.
 
Do you realize that there are millions of people who live somewhere in the US who share NAT'ted IP addresses? They don't get their own, not really. The one shared with the world is for the router itself. In some communities, especially those apartments that are giving wifi as part of your lease, they have one big router with private subnets. In fact, this has proven to be an issue with gaming because some games/gaming networks ban based on IPs, resulting in people who weren't doing anything wrong to deserve a ban also getting banned simply because these companies are being lazy.

And some people in families share computers/devices, even among adults. Others can in fact easily hack into your wifi for their own IP.

There are also other reasons this would not work.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk

Then you can just imagine all the different ways mail-in ballots could be manipulated. [along with the people who have them]
 
Barrack Hussain Obama: "Mr Trump, there is no evidence that a single vote has or will be rigged, stop whining and get people to vote for you...
 
Then you can just imagine all the different ways mail-in ballots could be manipulated. [along with the people who have them]

25% of ballots in 2016 were cast by mail. That’s up from about 12% in 1992. So far no one has has found anything remotely resembling widespread voter fraud.
 
Then you can just imagine all the different ways mail-in ballots could be manipulated. [along with the people who have them]

Vote Suppression is manipulated by the Fascist Conservatives that own the GOP name with Koch dollars.
 
Then you can just imagine all the different ways mail-in ballots could be manipulated. [along with the people who have them]

What one imagines isn't necessarily a reality. This is clearly one of those times.
 
Spare yourself and don't read it if it offends you.

I read it because I thought it would actually lead to a story. But there was no link and no real point to the topic.

I'm going to let him cry, but I'm not going to sit here and not point out that he's doing it.
 
You can always stop reading them or commenting in them. Apparently you lack the proper restraint.

You do realize that you've done much the same on both positive and negative stories about Trump.

Learn to take your own advice Airyaman, or at least have some integrity in the matter.
 
Back
Top Bottom