• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Amy Klobuchar is the best pick for Joe Biden

beerftw said:
Harris got destroyed by gabbard, gabbard is a polite form of trump, if gabbard could destroy harris instantly harris will do nothing but drag down biden unless the media went full retard trying to protect her every second of the day and found a way to block all political ads and debates. Basically harris is a weak vp candidate who could only thrive with zero competition, she was already shown the door once pretending it did not happen will not prevent it from happening again especially with someone as ruthless as trump.
Click to expand...

Gabbard couldn't destroy a toddler pulling a temper tantrum. She was useless from day one, and was a plant from Russia and the GOP.
 
beerftw said:
She got defeated in a single debate by doing nothing more than noting her record, anyone who has a record so corrupt that just pointing it out destroys their entire presidential campaign should not be a vp pick unless the powers that be are so ignorant that they believe her being black would over ride her entire piss poor record already shown to the world.
Click to expand...

Who are you talking about? Harris or Demings?
 
Superfly said:
Gabbard couldn't destroy a toddler pulling a temper tantrum. She was useless from day one, and was a plant from Russia and the GOP.
Click to expand...

Yet she entirely wrecked harris's campaign, and the democrats fought tooth and nail to keep her ut of future debates.

So if gabbard could not destroy a toddler, that means harris is worse than a toddler running for vp, think about that one for a minute.
 
Michael Cole said:
Who are you talking about? Harris or Demings?
Click to expand...

harris, demings so far does not have the defeat or extreme baggage harris does, not to say demings is perfect, but so far harris is the worst choice.

If the democrats can not pull up anyone but defeated ultra corrupt politicians who can only survive by their easily researchable corrupt record being hidden then the democrats are doomed, there are many to choose for vp but many seem stuck on someone who could not last a single debate without getting crushed by one of the lowest ranking of the dnc primary.
 
Joe Biden will fill his administration with African Americans. Having a black vice president, a job that basically does nothing, never really means much to me.

He should pick the VP that helps him win. Then he can put qualified Democrats all over government.
 
beerftw said:
Yet she entirely wrecked harris's campaign, and the democrats fought tooth and nail to keep her ut of future debates.
Click to expand...

She didn't wreck anything of Harris's. Harris ran out of money, and unlike Gabbard, Harris knew when to leave the party. Gabbard stayed until the cleaning crew showed up the next day, took the lampshade off her head and sent her drunk behind home.

So if gabbard could not destroy a toddler, that means harris is worse than a toddler running for vp, think about that one for a minute.
Click to expand...

Your hatred of Harris is noted and ignored. Your crush on GOP operative Gabbard is noted and made fun of.
 
CaughtInThe said:
Joe Biden will fill his administration with African Americans. Having a black vice president, a job that basically does nothing, never really means much to me.

He should pick the VP that helps him win. Then he can put qualified Democrats all over government.
Click to expand...

I hate to be morbid, but Joe needs to choose wisely for more reasons than one. He may not make it 4 years.
 
beerftw said:
harris, demings so far does not have the defeat or extreme baggage harris does, not to say demings is perfect, but so far harris is the worst choice.

If the democrats can not pull up anyone but defeated ultra corrupt politicians who can only survive by their easily researchable corrupt record being hidden then the democrats are doomed, there are many to choose for vp but many seem stuck on someone who could not last a single debate without getting crushed by one of the lowest ranking of the dnc primary.
Click to expand...

Like I said, I get it. You don't have to hammer it home. I think Val Demings is much sharper than Kamala Harris. That doesn't mean Kamala Harris isn't an intelligent woman. Either would tear Trump and Pence to shreds on an intellectual level.
 
Superfly said:
She didn't wreck anything of Harris's. Harris ran out of money, and unlike Gabbard, Harris knew when to leave the party. Gabbard stayed until the cleaning crew showed up the next day, took the lampshade off her head and sent her drunk behind home.



Your hatred of Harris is noted and ignored. Your crush on GOP operative Gabbard is noted and made fun of.
Click to expand...




The most significant one pointed out that destroyed harris was that she intentionally blocked evidence of a deathrow inmate knowing they were innocent until forced by the court, what type of law and justice type knowingly keeps evidence to keep innocent men on death row, harris has an absolutely abysmal record and gabbard just pinted it out, her campaign did not go broke until after because she was in the front before that debate.

You playing ignorance will not help your cause, it only hurts the democrats by pretending a failure is not and hoping and praying republicans are not smart enough to understand google and youtube and endlessly expose her record on the internet and in tv ads.
Did you even watch that debate or did you blank it all out of your head and pretend it did not exist?
 
Superfly said:
She didn't wreck anything of Harris's. Harris ran out of money, and unlike Gabbard, Harris knew when to leave the party. Gabbard stayed until the cleaning crew showed up the next day, took the lampshade off her head and sent her drunk behind home.



Your hatred of Harris is noted and ignored. Your crush on GOP operative Gabbard is noted and made fun of.
Click to expand...

:lamo

Good stuff. Lampshade. Lmao
 
Michael Cole said:
Like I said, I get it. You don't have to hammer it home. I think Val Demings is much sharper than Kamala Harris. That doesn't mean Kamala Harris isn't an intelligent woman. Either would tear Trump and Pence to shreds on an intellectual level.
Click to expand...

I never said harris was not intelligent, I believe harris is completely corrupt on epic levels with a record to show it that is near impossible to hide. Demings not so much about, other candidates not so much about, the choice for vp should not be choosing the most corrupt person possible as the vp will do little or nothing to boost numbers but can greatly tank a presidents odds.
 
Michael Cole said:
:lamo

Good stuff. Lampshade. Lmao
Click to expand...



Pretending it did not happen does not mean it did not happen, that single debate wrecked her, and it seems like democrats forgetting that somehow erased all her past corruption, even though it did not and republicans would pounce on that.
 
beerftw said:


The most significant one pointed out that destroyed harris was that she intentionally blocked evidence of a deathrow inmate knowing they were innocent until forced by the court, what type of law and justice type knowingly keeps evidence to keep innocent men on death row, harris has an absolutely abysmal record and gabbard just pinted it out, her campaign did not go broke until after because she was in the front before that debate.

You playing ignorance will not help your cause, it only hurts the democrats by pretending a failure is not and hoping and praying republicans are not smart enough to understand google and youtube and endlessly expose her record on the internet and in tv ads.
Did you even watch that debate or did you blank it all out of your head and pretend it did not exist?
Click to expand...


So what you got on Val Demings? What did you think of her role as an impeachment manager?
 
beerftw said:


Pretending it did not happen does not mean it did not happen, that single debate wrecked her, and it seems like democrats forgetting that somehow erased all her past corruption, even though it did not and republicans would pounce on that.
Click to expand...


I certainly didn't forget about Kamala's sketchy past; in fact I was one of the very few people warning that it would be her undoing, knowing her record, well before it even happened, and in fact, pretty much since she declared. It wasn't a matter of if it would sink her, but when.
 
beerftw said:


The most significant one pointed out that destroyed harris was that she intentionally blocked evidence of a deathrow inmate knowing they were innocent until forced by the court, what type of law and justice type knowingly keeps evidence to keep innocent men on death row, harris has an absolutely abysmal record and gabbard just pinted it out, her campaign did not go broke until after because she was in the front before that debate.

You playing ignorance will not help your cause, it only hurts the democrats by pretending a failure is not and hoping and praying republicans are not smart enough to understand google and youtube and endlessly expose her record on the internet and in tv ads.
Did you even watch that debate or did you blank it all out of your head and pretend it did not exist?
Click to expand...


I watched all the debates, and clearly we saw things differently. Your sweet little crush is precious, though. It really is. You should write her a note and ask her to check yes or no if she likes you. Just make sure you write it in Russian. I don't think she would understand it any other way.
 
beerftw said:


Pretending it did not happen does not mean it did not happen, that single debate wrecked her, and it seems like democrats forgetting that somehow erased all her past corruption, even though it did not and republicans would pounce on that.
Click to expand...


I was laughing at her characterization of the Gabbard campaign.
 
Michael Cole said:
So what you got on Val Demings? What did you think of her role as an impeachment manager?
Click to expand...

I do not know enough about her to comment truthfully, that could be good or bad, but considering how little I know of her it might be good meaning she is not in the spotlight for corruption.
 
BrotherFease said:
I thought about this for the past week, and have come to the conclusion that Amy Klobuchar is the best pick for the job. Yes, I get it. She's not black, which is unacceptable by the woke police. But keep in mind this: Charlamagne tha God, Joe Rogan, and progressive media do not represent the views of the American people, regardless of political party. Keep in mind these are the same people who bashed Biden from the beginning and constantly doubted his chances of winning the nomination. The facts on the ground show that Biden crushed the competition and came out of the February primary contests leading in the popular vote and in a close second place to Bernie Sanders in the delegate count.

Let me point out some facts for people to digest:

1. Biden ran on a left-of-center platform and won over the demographic that actually votes in elections -- the over 45 club and the moderate-to-slight left crowd.
2. Despite raising much more money than Biden, Sanders only won the popular vote in 8 states, won 9 presidential contests, and drop out in early April. Warren also ran as a progressive candidate, and won ZERO presidential contests and came in third place within her own state.
3. The Democrat Party's biggest struggles was winning over the mid-west. That's their weakness area.

The mere concept he needs to appeal to progressives/socialist in order to win is bogus. Their movement is primarily with people under the age of 45 and they are the least likely to vote. What Biden really needs to do is win over the blue collar workers who voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012, and then flipped to Trump in 2016. These are going to get you at most 64 electoral college votes. Picking Klobuchar means, you're getting somebody from the mid-west, highly experienced (13.5 years in the Senate), and holds Biden's left-of-center political views.
Click to expand...

I agree with this. Although Klobuchar would be my second choice. Picking Klobuchar means Minnesota stays blue. Few remember that Hillary won Minnesota by a single point, 44,000 votes. Amy would also help in neighboring Wisconsin and in Michigan. Most likely returning those two states back into being part of the blue wall. She helps Biden get to 270 and she also brings regional balance to the ticket. Northeasterner and Midwesterner. You covered her assets well.

The other candidate for VP that could help Biden get to 270 is the Hispanic Senator Masto from Nevada. She would keep Nevada blue and help to deliver Arizona to Biden. She would be of tremendous help to Biden in Texas, giving Biden a legitimate shot at winning that state. Although she lacks the experience of Klobuchar, 4 years as a senator, she was also Nevada's AG prior to that for 8 years. She also brings regional balance to the ticket

I think both would be attractive to the non-affiliate, independent, swing voters much more than a Warren which progressives are pushing. Both are younger and would bring a fresh face into the mix. These two would give Biden his best chance at attaining 270 electoral votes.
 
Superfly said:
I watched all the debates, and clearly we saw things differently. Your sweet little crush is precious, though. It really is. You should write her a note and ask her to check yes or no if she likes you. Just make sure you write it in Russian. I don't think she would understand it any other way.
Click to expand...

So calling it a crush to go out of your way to defend an extremely corrupt politician exposed to the world for trying to keep an innocent man on deathrow knowing he was innocent until the court forced her to release the evidence.

The only thing you are proving is you will support any amound of corruption and lawlessness and justify it so long as it aligns with your political ideology.
 
beerftw said:
I do not know enough about her to comment truthfully, that could be good or bad, but considering how little I know of her it might be good meaning she is not in the spotlight for corruption.
Click to expand...

You didn't watch the impeachment trial?
 
Michael Cole said:
I was laughing at her characterization of the Gabbard campaign.
Click to expand...

So you completely ignored the bringing up of harring hiding evidence of an innocent man on death row until forced by the courts, you might as well admit at this point democrats will flat out support anyone no matter how corrupt so long as they align with their ideology as you seem to have zero problem with her record of wanting to send innocent men to their death over political reasons.
 
Michael Cole said:
You didn't watch the impeachment trial?
Click to expand...

The impeachment trial was one sided, the house blocked republicans from most everything and the senate turned around and did the same to democrats, a pissing contest with no real substance or justice.
 
beerftw said:
So you completely ignored the bringing up of harring hiding evidence of an innocent man on death row until forced by the courts, you might as well admit at this point democrats will flat out support anyone no matter how corrupt so long as they align with their ideology as you seem to have zero problem with her record of wanting to send innocent men to their death over political reasons.
Click to expand...

WTF? How many times do I have to repeat myself? I support Demings, not Harris, for the reasons I specified. Why do you keep repeating this bull**** to me?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom