• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Two angry Republican Judges go after Emmett Sullivan

Sand Castle

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
6,797
Reaction score
3,285
Location
Massachusetts
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Two angry Republican appeals Judges go after Judge Sullivan.

Just felt like saying that after listening to the horse "***** about Meuller team of angry Democrats.
 
Sullivan is most likely going to get his ass kicked, but he asked for it. And I do hope you feel better now.
 
Two angry Republican appeals Judges go after Judge Sullivan.

Just felt like saying that after listening to the horse "***** about Meuller team of angry Democrats.

What makes you think "Two angry Republican appeals Judges go after Judge Sullivan"?
 
Sullivan is kicking GOP butt and that will be the only ongoing in this deal.
 
Sullivan is most likely going to get his ass kicked, but he asked for it. And I do hope you feel better now.

To kick Judge Sullivans ass, would set an interesting precedent. The three appelate judges, if they just kick ass, would then begin a new justice system.

The two angry Republican judges plus one, single handedly, would set a precedent allowing a politically appointed Attorney General to re-write an investigation and trial. An investigation and trial started under a different AG.

AG Bill Barr in coordination with Powell the defendants attorney, eliminated career prosecutors in the case, judges decisions were polluted inorder to torpedo the case that had been tried and conviction.

I am not convinced that Judges are inclined to undermine their own authority and judicial independence.

So, for another hypothetical ass kicking and with Judge Sullivan hiring a high powered attorney, may we soon see Trump defense attorney Barr under oath.

Barr under oath explaining why he discounted Judge Sullivans rulings, undermined his own career prosecutors, ignored the Horowitcz report, had private discussions with Flynn's attorney Powell and then hired a cronie to make the ends justify his means.

And then under oath Barr explaining how he defends: Barr argued that the lie that Flynn was prosecuted for telling investigators wasn't actually "material" or influential to an investigation. They did not have a basis for a counterintelligence investigation against Flynn at that stage," Barr said, referring to the FBI

Barr can also explain what this has to do with justice: "Well, history is written by the winner," Barr replied. "So it largely depends on who's writing the history.

Under oath: Jeff Jensen -- the US attorney Barr named to review the handling of the Flynn case who said Thursday that he recommended that the case be dismissed

Barr defends dropping Flynn case: 'I'm doing the law's bidding' - CNNPolitics

Under oath: Barr “twisted my words” to justify dropping Flynn case, former top Justice Department official says
There was no disagreement on whether Flynn's false statements were a "counterintelligence threat," Mary McCord says

Barr “twisted my words” to justify dropping Flynn case, former top Justice Department official says | Salon.com

Shea under oath: Note that just Acting US Attorney Timothy Shea signed this filing, SHEA CLAIMS THERE’S NEW MATERIAL BUT POINTS TO NONE
As noted, Shea repeatedly justifies this move by claiming there is “newly discovered” material. offered none.

To Justify Dismissing Mike Flynn's Prosecution, Timothy Shea Claims Information DOJ Has Always Had Is "New" | emptywheel

Under oath- The Justice Department prosecutor, Brandon Van Grack
 
To kick Judge Sullivans ass, would set an interesting precedent. The three appelate judges, if they just kick ass, would then begin a new justice system.

The two angry Republican judges plus one, single handedly, would set a precedent allowing a politically appointed Attorney General to re-write an investigation and trial. An investigation and trial started under a different AG.

AG Bill Barr in coordination with Powell the defendants attorney, eliminated career prosecutors in the case, judges decisions were polluted inorder to torpedo the case that had been tried and conviction.

I am not convinced that Judges are inclined to undermine their own authority and judicial independence.

So, for another hypothetical ass kicking and with Judge Sullivan hiring a high powered attorney, may we soon see Trump defense attorney Barr under oath.

Barr under oath explaining why he discounted Judge Sullivans rulings, undermined his own career prosecutors, ignored the Horowitcz report, had private discussions with Flynn's attorney Powell and then hired a cronie to make the ends justify his means.

And then under oath Barr explaining how he defends: Barr argued that the lie that Flynn was prosecuted for telling investigators wasn't actually "material" or influential to an investigation. They did not have a basis for a counterintelligence investigation against Flynn at that stage," Barr said, referring to the FBI

Barr can also explain what this has to do with justice: "Well, history is written by the winner," Barr replied. "So it largely depends on who's writing the history.

Under oath: Jeff Jensen -- the US attorney Barr named to review the handling of the Flynn case who said Thursday that he recommended that the case be dismissed

Barr defends dropping Flynn case: 'I'm doing the law's bidding' - CNNPolitics

Under oath: Barr “twisted my words” to justify dropping Flynn case, former top Justice Department official says
There was no disagreement on whether Flynn's false statements were a "counterintelligence threat," Mary McCord says

Barr “twisted my words” to justify dropping Flynn case, former top Justice Department official says | Salon.com

Shea under oath: Note that just Acting US Attorney Timothy Shea signed this filing, SHEA CLAIMS THERE’S NEW MATERIAL BUT POINTS TO NONE
As noted, Shea repeatedly justifies this move by claiming there is “newly discovered” material. offered none.

To Justify Dismissing Mike Flynn's Prosecution, Timothy Shea Claims Information DOJ Has Always Had Is "New" | emptywheel

Under oath- The Justice Department prosecutor, Brandon Van Grack

Sullivan reversed his own rulings prohibiting amicus briefs. It looks like when his butt is on the line, he was pretty quick to abandon that position.

Van Grack withdrew in disgrace. Withholding exculpatory evidence is a big no no, and one a veteran prosecutor could only do intentionally.

The fact remains that there was no reason for Flynn to be investigated to start with. This is known. That the prosecutors did the equivalent of "we've got your children" to Flynn is something thugs and terrorists do - not those who pursue justice.

Sullivan has only made his position worse, and I'll not be shedding any tears for him if he doesn't fare well.
 
Sullivan is in charge, not Barr.

No exculpatory evidence was withheld; Flynn lied, which he offense he admitted under oath twice.

Judges are not going to overthrow the rule of law for Trump and Barr.

Judge Sullivan is going to fare well exceedingly.
 
Sullivan is kicking GOP butt and that will be the only ongoing in this deal.


Trump sycophant Rep. Doug Collins:

"He's wanting to play every position, he wants to play the defense attorney, the prosecutor... the judge, he wants to bring in his own hearings here. This is something that's very concerning," Collins told co-host Griff Jenkins. "It's no shock to me that he finally had to go get his outside counsel because he's operating in areas right here that frankly, he needs to explain."

When I first read this, I thought, well this could Barr that Collins is reffering to.

Rep. Doug Collins suggests Flynn judge may have '''conflict of interest''' after hiring personal attorney | Fox News
 
Two angry Republican appeals Judges go after Judge Sullivan.

Just felt like saying that after listening to the horse "***** about Meuller team of angry Democrats.

you mean an appeals court has asked flynn to justify himself after he has recently flouted 2 higher court decisions.
leftist showing once again they hate the rule of law.
 
Barr has a conflict of interest the which he needs to explain in court.
 
Sullivan is in charge, not Barr.

No exculpatory evidence was withheld; Flynn lied, which he offense he admitted under oath twice.

Judges are not going to overthrow the rule of law for Trump and Barr.

Judge Sullivan is going to fare well exceedingly.

facts state otherwise.

not sure what will happen to sullivan. he is in deep doodoo which is why he hired a defense attorney which is another unprecedented move.
 
you mean an appeals court has asked flynn to justify himself after he has recently flouted 2 higher court decisions.
leftist showing once again they hate the rule of law.

Flynn himself, just a rube and a pawn. When Sullivan's attorney presents evidence that places Barr's motion in question, I guess either Barr defends his faulty dismisal dragging in all players under oath or sticks it to Flynn to save his own ass and withdraws it.
 
Sullivan is in charge, not Barr.

No exculpatory evidence was withheld; Flynn lied, which he offense he admitted under oath twice.

Judges are not going to overthrow the rule of law for Trump and Barr.

Judge Sullivan is going to fare well exceedingly.


You have to wonder where they get this idiotic nonsense.

And even more, why they believe it, no matter how obviously nonsensical it is.
 
facts state otherwise.

not sure what will happen to sullivan. he is in deep doodoo which is why he hired a defense attorney which is another unprecedented move.

The lawyer for Sullivan will present the legal need for amicus briefs. This is not a disciplinary matter.

The appelate judges will determine whether Sullivan used the law correctly. If not, Flynn case dismissed.
If yes, amicus briefs.

Appelate courts are not inplace to censor or punish judges.
 
The lawyer for Sullivan will present the legal need for amicus briefs. This is not a disciplinary matter.

The appelate judges will determine whether Sullivan used the law correctly. If not, Flynn case dismissed.
If yes, amicus briefs.

Appelate courts are not inplace to censor or punish judges.

Ludin unfactually believes otherwise.
 
The lawyer for Sullivan will present the legal need for amicus briefs. This is not a disciplinary matter.

The appelate judges will determine whether Sullivan used the law correctly. If not, Flynn case dismissed.
If yes, amicus briefs.

Appelate courts are not inplace to censor or punish judges.

And the worst thing that will happen to Sullivan is he will be reversed. These rubes are under the impression that Sullivan will face some sort of criminal consequences.
 
Sullivan is going to resign to avoid impeachment and removal, then become a cooperating witness for the government.
 
Sullivan is in charge, not Barr.

No exculpatory evidence was withheld; Flynn lied, which he offense he admitted under oath twice.

Judges are not going to overthrow the rule of law for Trump and Barr.

Judge Sullivan is going to fare well exceedingly.

Sullivan has no authority over Barr.
 
Sullivan is going to resign to avoid impeachment and removal, then become a cooperating witness for the government.

All I have to say:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2020-05-24 at 10.12.36 PM.jpg
    Screenshot 2020-05-24 at 10.12.36 PM.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 30
Back
Top Bottom