Clinton's Emails on Wiener's Laptop - Fact or Fiction?

marke said:

Fingers in the ears democrat cultists: 'I don't wnat to hear any more. Don't tell me about democrat crimes when you have the son of Satan hisself sitting on the throne in the White House!'

Click to expand...

lol...I'm not a democrat, marke. And you are the last person on this entire forum who should throw the word cultist around.

But, hey, keep throwing punches at ghosts. You're not fooling anyone, only proving how willing a certain percentage of Americans are to sacrifice their integrity, and why they shouldn't be listened to.

OlNate said:

lol...I'm not a democrat, marke. And you are the last person on this entire forum who should throw the word cultist around.

But, hey, keep throwing punches at ghosts. You're not fooling anyone, only proving how willing a certain percentage of Americans are to sacrifice their integrity, and why they shouldn't be listened to.

Click to expand...

I did not accuse you of being a democrat. I accused democrats of not being interested in having courts judge democrats for crimes they commit.

Its a fact , and its the reason Comey came out in Oct. and told us about it. He may not have wated to , and clearly Lynch didn't want it, but he was told by the local FBI team it was about to leak.

"the New York field office and the Manhattan US attorney, Preet Bharara, took the lead in the Weiner investigation. On September 26, the government asked for and was granted a search warrant and seized Weiner's iPhone, iPad, and laptop computer the same day. One of the FBI's digital extraction technicians noticed within hours that there were about 340,000 emails on the laptop. Among the domain addresses were Yahoo.com, State.gov, Clintonfoundation.org, Clintonemail.com, and Hillaryclinton.com. "Am I seeing what I think I'm seeing?" the technician wondered.
At the technician's request, the computer was looked at by another agent, who described it as an "oh ****" moment and agreed they needed to report the discovery "up the chain" immediately. They also drafted an email that began, "Just putting this on the record because of the optics of the case."

andrew mccabe
Andrew McCabe. REUTERS/James Lawler Duggan
Two days later, on September 28, the New York FBI office's assistant director, Bill Sweeney, relayed news of the discovery during a weekly teleconference with FBI headquarters in Washington. Ordinarily, then-FBI Director James Comey would have been presiding, but he was testifying that afternoon on Capitol Hill, so Andrew McCabe, Comey's deputy, handled it. One participant said that Sweeney's revelation was like "dropping a bomb in the middle of the meeting" and stated that "everybody realized the significance of this, like, potential trove of information." He said Sweeney "very much emphasized the significance of what he thought they had there."
How one agent forced the FBI to reopen Hillary Clinton investigation - Insider

And we can just add this to the numerous crimes committed by Hillary and her aides. Hillary sent classified info from her commercial phone (a felony) to Huma's commercial phone, (another felony)",. Huma then sent it to her home laptop that her slimy husband was using (another felony)

was anyone prosecuted? Pffffftttttt

marke said:

FactCheck.org posted this:

Clinton's Emails, Weiner's Laptop and a Falsehood - FactCheck.org

So, let's assume some of the facts, as recorded in this report, are accurate.

1. The FBI News Cycle story claims that the document proves that now-fired FBI agent Peter Strzok "buried evidence of HRC's corruption."

2. On July 5, 2016, former FBI Director announced that the bureau would recommend that charges not be filed in the probe into Clinton's use of a private email system while heading the State Department.

3. On Sept 26, 2016, the FBI executed a search warrant on former Rep. Anthony Weiner's iPhone, iPad and laptop computer, and discovered 141,000 emails on the laptop that were potentially relevant to the FBI's closed investigation of Clinton.

4. A month later, on Oct 28, 2016, Comey told lawmakers in a letter that the FBI had "learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation" and that investigators would "review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information."

5. On Nov 6, 2016, Comey told Congress in a follow-up memo that the FBI had "reviewed all the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State" and that officials "have not changed our conclusions."

6. The election took place on Nov 8, 2016.

7. "While the NYPD was conducting a forensic examination analysis of the Weiner/Abedin laptop, it was discovered that the hard drive contained 350,000 of Hillary Clinton's emails and 344,000 Blasckberry communications," the story says.

So what is the "Falsehood" FactCheck claims is the problem? This:

Q: Did the FBI wait until after the 2016 election to review the Hillary Clinton emails found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop?

A: No. A viral story misinterprets an FBI document and ignores widely reported facts.

The facts itemized are not falsehoods, the claim that the FBI did not examine the computer before the election is false. That's good to know. I'm glad we cleared that up.

Click to expand...

Hillary lost bro, get over it.

Clinton isn't running for POTUS again, and yet here we are.
100K dead and a bungled response to a pandemic and this is something we need to go over again?
Use distraction tactics if you must, but maybe something more relevant?
Nah, stick with Clinton. Everyone needs a boogey-man.

Apocalypto said:

Hillary lost bro, get over it.

Click to expand...

Yes, she lost, and if she had not hired liars to try set Trump up to be illegally impeached we might have been able to simply overlook her past crimes. But not now.

Pound4abrown said:

Clinton isn't running for POTUS again, and yet here we are.
100K dead and a bungled response to a pandemic and this is something we need to go over again?
Use distraction tactics if you must, but maybe something more relevant?
Nah, stick with Clinton. Everyone needs a boogey-man.

Click to expand...

Is this OP about Hilary's emails? James Comey forgave her of her sins, so why can't we?



Can there be any doubt as to how the Russians got Hillary's emails?

marke said:

I did not accuse you of being a democrat. I accused democrats of not being interested in having courts judge democrats for crimes they commit.

Click to expand...

My dude...she's had her day in court, many times over, and no one has been able to make anything stick. You guys bawl all the time about Trump being constantly accused of things...how is this any different? Or is this some kind of Trumpist revenge?

I dunno, man, this all seems very important to you, but in my mind you guys seem to have more pressing matters to focus on, and more recent failings to judge.

OlNate said:

My dude...she's had her day in court, many times over, and no one has been able to make anything stick. You guys bawl all the time about Trump being constantly accused of things...how is this any different? Or is this some kind of Trumpist revenge?

I dunno, man, this all seems very important to you, but in my mind you guys seem to have more pressing matters to focus on, and more recent failings to judge.

Click to expand...

You problably should be told that Justice Department officials are still investigating Hillary, Strzok, Comey and others for their conspiracy to pervert justice in 2016.

for the email she did NOT have her day in court...guess why?

So how, you might ask, could Hillary possible have skated free after what she did with her emails every day for 4 YEARS? Well Obama and Lynch had a brilliant plan that worked perfectly, for them and Hillary.
Hillary and her aides were investigated for real crimes. So how many Grand Juries were impaneled to call witnesses, issue subpoenas and search warrants, hear testimony and then make a judgement on indictment, as in the Mueller probe? Answer - ZERO. That’s right folks, she could not have been indicted because L. Lynch never allowed the ONLY vehicle in our Justice System for that, a Grand JURY. And Comey never called her on it
To facilitate this criminal whitewash words were changed in the Investigations findings to eliminate “gross negligence”, which would have indicated that the crime, as described in the Statute 18 U.S. Code § 793, had been committed
18 U.S. Code SS 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
“DOJ Prevented FBI From Pursuing Gross Negligence Charges Against Clinton”
“In order for Clinton to be prosecuted, the DOJ required the FBI to establish evidence of intent—even though the gross negligence statute explicitly does not require this.”
EXCLUSIVE: DOJ Prevented FBI From Pursuing Gross Negligence Charges Against Clinton

“Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, “
“Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted under questioning from Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe last summer that "the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information," the congressman alleged in a social media post late Tuesday, citing a newly unearthed transcript of Page's closed-door testimony.
Page and since-fired FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, who were romantically involved, exchanged numerous anti-Trump text messages in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election, and Republicans have long accused the bureau of political bias. But Page's testimony was perhaps the most salient evidence yet that the Justice Department improperly interfered with the FBI's supposedly independent conclusions on Clinton's criminal culpability, Ratcliffe alleged.
"So let me if I can, I know I’m testing your memory," Ratcliffe began as he questioned Page under oath, according to a transcript excerpt he posted on Twitter. "But when you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to —"
Page interrupted: "That is correct," as Ratcliffe finished his sentence, " -- bring a case based on that."”

No doubt.

she did all her work using a commercial phone and uin secure networks

As Come said

With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is likely that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."
Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

marke said:

Is this OP about Hilary's emails? James Comey forgave her of her sins, so why can't we?

View attachment 67281747

Can there be any doubt as to how the Russians got Hillary's emails?

Click to expand...

I don't know, why can't you?

BS.

she never faced a grand jury