• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

So, what's next after "Obamagate"?

Does it matter? I mean seriously Trump does stuff that makes Creepy Joe look like a saint.
And we know of these things from his own big mouth. I find it super creepy how much glee was in his voice about walking in on those girls.
But defend it anyway.
Neither of these men wins the prize for being a great human.

Earlier in a comment about Trump and the beauty pageants I said ...

Perks of the job, I guess.
Abuse of power, you might call it.
You probably can't say the all abuse of power is the same I guess.
Something like a President misusing his intel agencies for political purposes.
You'd consider that worse, right?​

That's where I was going.
 
Keep moving the goal posts, djt is a pig and has always been one. What is the point you are trying to make?

I thought it was made pretty clearly.
But I made it again in #126 anyway.
 
Or.... Flynn was a National Security Risk and the President should have listened to Obama and Chris Christie when they said not to hire him.

Think of all the trouble it would have saved the President.

Looks like they were trying to do Trump a solid.

That's something I've always wondered about. If Obama holdovers were out to screw Trump, why did they run to the WH to give Trump a heads up?

Normally, DOJ investigations work like this: The DOJ investigates, build a rock solid case for indictment, and only then do they inform the target. They lay out the evidence they are going to use to indict and convict and let the target know how much prison time they are going to seek. Then they propose a plea deal in exchange for either a guilty plea or help in nailing a bigger fish or both.

If they were looking to nail Trump, why did they give Trump a heads up before striking the deal with Flynn? It doesn't make sense.
 
Show us an indictment. Otherwise, you're just producing methane.

Obama is untouchable, as is Biden. Look for indictments of Comey, Clapper and others in about 3 months.
 
Show us an indictment. Otherwise, you're just producing methane.

Barr already said from what he knows in Durham's probe so far, it's unlikely either Obama or Biden will be charged.
I've believed that all along.
Others may not be so lucky.
He also said Abuse of Power isn't always a crime.
I've known that all along too.
But revealing details of abuse of power can be eye-opening for many.
That's always healthy.
I don't think Barr said that ... but it's true anyway.
 
It’s Bidengate!!!

Ooooh! I like the sound of that! Let's go with that! We'll call it the biggest crime in the history of the world! Yeah, that's the ticket!

The Bidens stole a million-- a billion--- A TRILLION DOLLARS! They stole a TRILLION DOLLARS! Yeah, that's the ticket!
 
What have you read about what's being called Obamagate? Take a guess what it might refer to. HINT: it has something to do with the last 3 years.

So you don't have a clue, either. Take a guess? You first.
 
I would love to see someone do a "Man in the Street" interview survey with Trump supporters and ask them if they think Trump ought to repeal "Obamagate" with an executive order. I'm betting the majority would, because they are clueless.

Does anyone recall the MitS survey where Trumpsters were foursquare against Obamacare but wholly supported the Affordable Care Act?
 
You do know that Obamagate has nothing to do with a birth certificate...right?

Anyway, you seriously need to let that birth certificate thing go. it's been over for years.

And how did that turn out? Oh yeah, now I remember! Turns out Trump was lying all along. Some things never change.
 
That's something I've always wondered about. If Obama holdovers were out to screw Trump, why did they run to the WH to give Trump a heads up?

Normally, DOJ investigations work like this: The DOJ investigates, build a rock solid case for indictment, and only then do they inform the target. They lay out the evidence they are going to use to indict and convict and let the target know how much prison time they are going to seek. Then they propose a plea deal in exchange for either a guilty plea or help in nailing a bigger fish or both.

If they were looking to nail Trump, why did they give Trump a heads up before striking the deal with Flynn? It doesn't make sense.

It's the same reasoning that the Steele Dossier is the "Insurance Policy" that they keep secret until after the election while Comey publicly announces that the investigation into Clinton is reopening a few days before the election....

Well... there is no reason... It isn't supposed to make sense.

Just don't think about it too hard.
 
What's wrong with you? I've said it many times. On the first page, even.

Nope, read through every one of your posts. Nothing there. Now you did suggest this, but of course you provide no evidence, as if the accusation is proof in itself.

So you're saying Joe Biden still rapes women in hallways?
I bet he stopped doing that.

So, nothing wrong with me. You simply don't have a clue what "Obamagate" means. That's OK, neither does anyone else. That's because Trump just made up a word, hoping someone else would fill in the blanks.
 
Nope, read through every one of your posts. Nothing there. Now you did suggest this, but of course you provide no evidence, as if the accusation is proof in itself.



So, nothing wrong with me. You simply don't have a clue what "Obamagate" means. That's OK, neither does anyone else. That's because Trump just made up a word, hoping someone else would fill in the blanks.

You're absolutely correct.
It was a different thread.
This one ... https://www.debatepolitics.com/us-p...rms/398518-hell-obamagate.html#post1071860071
It was over a week ago when others were struggling with the meaning of Obamagate.
Happy to help.
 
It is critical to Trump's campaign that an alleged scandal, any scandal be 'investigated' during the campaign. This has been a standard GOP strategy for decades. So far, nothing they have tried has gained traction on Biden.

So what's next? Well, I suppose that depends on who Biden picks as his VP running mate. You can bet GOP operatives are busy trying to dig up some dirt on all the potential candidates.

Regardless, we can expect the senate to launch an investigation before the election. The DOJ will also probably follow suit.
Its messed up that this blatant corruption of the federal government apparatus will be allowed to be wielded against challenging opponents during an election campaign. It should be universally denounced unless there is a real surface evident and obvious crime. Meanwhile we just watched the trump admin unlawfully block legitimate subpoenas on oversight. It's the definition of corruption.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
So you're saying Joe Biden still rapes women in hallways?
I bet he stopped doing that.
Probably promised BO he would back in 2008.

Do you have any proof he raped women in hallways? Or are you spouting nonsense again?
 
Last edited:
I would love to see someone do a "Man in the Street" interview survey with Trump supporters and ask them if they think Trump ought to repeal "Obamagate" with an executive order. I'm betting the majority would, because they are clueless.

Does anyone recall the MitS survey where Trumpsters were foursquare against Obamacare but wholly supported the Affordable Care Act?

I remember years ago when they asked idiot Republicans on the street about the "ACA" and "Obamacare" all of them said they supported the ACA, BUT not Obamacare. None of those idiots knew it was the same healthcare law, and only opposed "Obamacare" because of Obama's name. A bunch of worthless sheep if there ever was any.
 
Next? What could top one administration trying to sabotage the political campaign of the opposition party and then the presidency of that party after they won? The left knows they can't defend this so they act as if it didn't happen when the evidence is now overwhelming that it did. Yet, they keep chasing after Russian collusion, something all their own people privately admitted never happened. Amazing.

Evidence is so "overwhelming" your own idiot president couldn't even explain what the hell "Obamagate" was, and his corrupt toady AG won't even touch this non story with a 10 foot pole. Like I said, your leaders will have to go back to the drawing board and come out with another phony scandal to tar Biden with. So far the losers are 0-3 now.
 
Do you have any proof he raped women in hallways? Or are you spouting nonsense again?

You mean like a blue dress? No, there's no proof like that. But the Blasey prosecution rests nonetheless.
 
Oh, absolutely. Pathetic losers who can't run on policy and have zero accomplishments to boot will most certainly try to muddy the waters to tip the election towards Trump. I suspect something will suddenly pop up in October.

Crazy Uncle Rudy!
 
Evidence is so "overwhelming" your own idiot president couldn't even explain what the hell "Obamagate" was, and his corrupt toady AG won't even touch this non story with a 10 foot pole. Like I said, your leaders will have to go back to the drawing board and come out with another phony scandal to tar Biden with. So far the losers are 0-3 now.

Actually, they won't.

As the poster you were responding to aptly demonstrated, the Trump crowd is perfectly willing to accept an empty slogan as fact and go right on repeating it, regardless of whether its true or not or whether there is anything to it.

Many of them absolutely believe the Hillary Clinton had a child sex ring in a pizza parlor on Connecticut Ave, and that Obama is a Muslim.

They still believe whatever crap the man in their AM radio tells them. And since the man in their radio (or on the Reddit or Twitter feed) knows that they dont make money unless they tell this audience what it wants to believe.

That was just enough to nudge Trump close enough to win on an inside straight in 2016, dispite losing the popular vote badly.

I think that the best hope that Trump ever had was a repeat of that pattern.

The polls suggest otherwise, at the moment.

And the Russians have their own problems, so the carefully orchestrated right wing media campaign that they ran for Trump in 2016 is not likely to have the same effect.

And, since most of the people who innocently fell for fake news that was fed to them from the Russian source through their social media feeds, people outside Trump world will be a lot more skeptical about accepting this garbage at face value.

Of course, Trumpsters have a bottomless appetite for this fake nonsense., but it may turn out to be a circular firing squad.
 
Last edited:
Well, to be fair, this is the longest roll out of a "show" I have ever "stayed tuned" for.
Like years long. When is someone, not in Trump's orbit getting indicted?
I am tired of wait and see and stay tuned.

That's okay. Take a rest.
 
You mean like a blue dress? No, there's no proof like that. But the Blasey prosecution rests nonetheless.

So you have nothing, gotcha. 2 phony sexual assault allegations, "Obamagate", all already failed. What's next? Surely your president and his thugs can do better, no?
 
So you have nothing, gotcha. 2 phony sexual assault allegations, "Obamagate", all already failed. What's next? Surely your president and his thugs can do better, no?

Believe all women? No? That ain't the rule?
 
Back
Top Bottom