- Joined
- Jun 20, 2018
- Messages
- 22,604
- Reaction score
- 9,988
- Location
- Miami, FL
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Ummmmmmmmmmm, better businessman, better manager are just your opinions. Trump's economy is going along so well that even Democrats acknowledge it. Many democrats would disagree that Bloomberg would be the one to better address gender and color injustice. More philanthropic? Who gives a ****. We don't vote for a president depending on how much he gives to charity. That's ridiculous.
Better businessman is a doubt in your mind? Bloomberg started from scratch (father was a bookkeeper) and he is now worth $62 Billion dollars and never declared bankruptcy or had a company fail. Trump started with $414 million of his fathers money, took it down to a debt of $1.17 billion, declared bankruptcy 6 times and had 7 failures. He is worth approximately about $3 billion, which is about 20 times less than Bloomberg. That is a check mark for Bloomberg 100% over Trump.
Better manager is a doubt in your mind? Bloomberg was the mayor of New York for 12 years and everything from finances to social issues got substantially better. Trump got help from Congress to pass the tax cut that made things better but since then, Manufacturing is down, GDP is down, Income has not grown anymore, and social unrest is at an all time high and all the competent people in the administration have either left or been fired. He has no minorities in his administration either, while Bloomberg put Blacks, Latinos, and Women into positions of management and everything is now better. Better manager is a check mark for Bloomberg 100% over Trump.
Philanthropists are not important? Bloomberg has given in excess of $10 billion dollars to schools, teachers, programs for the betterment of the population while Trump has given Zero. That is another huge check mark for Bloomberg over Trump given that giving is better than taking.
Methinks you are blind and worse, blind by choice.