• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White-Supremacist Violence Is Terrorism

AlphaOmega said:
You bail already?
Click to expand...

No, but you did, clearly. You have yet to answer the fair question I posed to you up thread. You did see the question ? If not, I can give you the post #.
 
Logician Man said:
No, but you did, clearly. You have yet to answer the fair question I posed to you up thread. You did see the question ? If not, I can give you the post #.
Click to expand...

You asked me if If was pro life I then said Yes are you? Man up and debate me. You don't get to ask all the questions. So 4th time asking. ...are you pro life? Beta test initiated.
 
AlphaOmega said:
You asked me if If was pro life I then said Yes are you? Man up and debate me. You don't get to ask all the questions. So 4th time asking. ...are you pro life? Beta test initiated.
Click to expand...

And I asked you how you can profess to be pro-life, yet be an avid advocate for taking lives. You have yet to answer that fair question.
 
Logician Man said:
And I asked you how you can profess to be pro-life, yet be an avid advocate for taking lives. You have yet to answer that fair question.
Click to expand...
Yes...you dont get to keep asking questions without answering mine. You just beta'd. Is your argument that weak that you are frozen stiff when faced with the same question you asked me?
I am pro life.

Are you? 5th time asking. At this point we can consider you lost.
 
AlphaOmega said:
Yes...you dont get to keep asking questions without answering mine. You just beta'd. Is your argument that weak that you are frozen stiff when faced with the same question you asked me?
I am pro life.

Are you? 5th time asking. At this point we can consider you lost.
Click to expand...

I've already told told you I will answer your question when you tell us how you rectify your proclamation you are pro-life, yet you also advocate for taking human life. You seem to be struggling rather significantly rectifying those two diametrically opposing stances regarding the taking of human lives, as you also claim to be 'pro-life.'
 
Logician Man said:
I've already told told you I will answer your question when you tell us how you rectify your proclamation you are pro-life, yet you also advocate for taking human life. You seem to be struggling rather significantly rectifying those two diametrically opposing stances regarding the taking of human lives, as you also claim to be 'pro-life.'
Click to expand...

You lost the debate. You refused 5 times to answer the same question you asked me. Everyone can see your flail. Thanks for this....it was great fun. You made the right choice though. I would roast you....absolutely roast you in this debate. Its too bad you run from honest debate. When you work up some courage, feel free to answer your own question then we can continue. lol...he bailed on his own question....how pathetic is that?
 
AlphaOmega said:
You lost the debate. You refused 5 times to answer the same question you asked me. Everyone can see your flail. Thanks for this....it was great fun. You made the right choice though. I would roast you....absolutely roast you in this debate. Its too bad you run from honest debate. When you work up some courage, feel free to answer your own question then we can continue. lol...he bailed on his own question....how pathetic is that?
Click to expand...

You can 'claim' anything you want. What you can't do is change the reality that when you were asked how you rectify your proclamation you are 'pro-life' and an avid advocator for taking human life, you went silent.
 
Logician Man said:
You can 'claim' anything you want. What you can't do is change the reality that when you were asked how you rectify your proclamation you are 'pro-life' and an avid advocator for taking human life, you went silent.
Click to expand...

alright you have a nice day licking those wounds.
 
Logician Man said:
You outed yourself as not being 'pro-life.' No one to blame for that outing but yourself. ( fact )
Click to expand...
If only you manned up and debated me on it eh? Anytime you grow some proverbial hair on your chest and want to debate this...just answer your own question I'll be here waiting to absolutely shred you to pieces on this.
 
AlphaOmega said:
If only you manned up and debated me on it eh? Anytime you grow some proverbial hair on your chest and want to debate this...just answer your own question I'll be here waiting to absolutely shred you to pieces on this.
Click to expand...

You don't shred anything but your own credibility when you refuse to answer how you can profess to be 'pro-life' in one breath, then in the next breath proclaim you would gladly, and personally, take human life. It's called learning to crawl before you learn to walk. ( fact )
 
Logician Man said:
You don't shred anything but your own credibility when you refuse to answer how you can profess to be 'pro-life' in one breath, then in the next breath proclaim you would gladly, and personally, take human life. It's called learning to crawl before you learn to walk. ( fact )
Click to expand...

If only you didn't beta and would participate in debating it eh?
 
AlphaOmega said:
If only you didn't beta and would participate in debating it eh?
Click to expand...

Answer the question if/when you summon up the courage. If you really to debate the issue, you'll answer the fair question. If not, you will continue to refuse to answer the fair question....your call...
 
Not quite sure how or why people are deflecting or trying to play victim over the fact that white supremacist violence has been ruled terrorism. It is terrorism. Duh.
 
DamnYankee said:
White-Supremacist violence is like leftist Antifa violence, not a dime's worth of difference and both are rejected by normal everyday Americans.
Click to expand...

I mean, I have often stated that Antifa followers should be locked up for their use of violence and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. That being said, not sure they've killed people yet. White-Supremacists on the other hand...have.
 
AmNat said:
We get it. You don’t like the President, his administration, or his supporters. Thank you for telling us for the hundredth time.
Click to expand...

I think you're off by several thousand...

But you don't want the government to have MORE control and LESS restraint?

You don't want those who espouse unpopular and/or unsavory views labeled terrorists????

That's Un-American!!!

:2mad:

:donkeyfla
 
Tigerace117 said:
The founding fathers were not, in fact, terrorists. They did not round up and massacre British or Tory civilians for political reasons....or any other ones, for that matter.

Your “definition” is rather ludicrous as well.
Click to expand...

In fact, they were. What a bizarre defining action.

Oh snap - ironic!
 
Logician Man said:
Answer the question if/when you summon up the courage. If you really to debate the issue, you'll answer the fair question. If not, you will continue to refuse to answer the fair question....your call...
Click to expand...
I did...then you refused to answer mine. I enjoy watching you avoid debating me. I...will....shred you on this argument.
 
3leftsdoo said:
In fact, they were. What a bizarre defining action.

Oh snap - ironic!
Click to expand...

Again, they were not. They did not engage in violence against British or Tory non-combatants for political purposes.

Your desperation to cry about how Neo Nazis and White Supremacists are “dissidents” and wailing about how they’ve been called out for being terrorists is rather telling though.
 
DamnYankee said:
White-Supremacist violence is like leftist Antifa violence, not a dime's worth of difference and both are rejected by normal everyday Americans.
Click to expand...

But some of them are good people;)
 
Tigerace117 said:
Again, they were not. They did not engage in violence against British or Tory non-combatants for political purposes.

Your desperation to cry about how Neo Nazis and White Supremacists are “dissidents” and wailing about how they’ve been called out for being terrorists is rather telling though.
Click to expand...

They were. You don't understand what terrorism is.

Some can be told, but never understand. :shrug:
 
3leftsdoo said:
They were. You don't understand what terrorism is.

Some can be told, but never understand. :shrug:
Click to expand...

Funny how you don’t actually present any actual evidence to support your claims.

Just going “because I said so” is not evidence.

Unlike conservatives I don’t buy into every little thing some random schmuck posts on the internet.

It’s almost like your argument is full of crap. Oh wait.....:roll:
 
Tigerace117 said:
Funny how you don’t actually present any actual evidence to support your claims.

Just going “because I said so” is not evidence.

Unlike conservatives I don’t buy into every little thing some random schmuck posts on the internet.

It’s almost like your argument is full of crap. Oh wait.....:roll:
Click to expand...

Self evident.

See above.

If you say so.

Unworthy of response. Ditto.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom