• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Go! Go! Go!

So what does tha have to do with her almost beating him by 4 MILLION more popular votes for example in the Dem primary?

Take your time

You seem to be totally not understanding. The reason Hillary got more votes is because her and the DNC had the primaries rigged against Bernie. You're not making any sense.
 
I guess all the Hillary voters had no Idea who Hillary was after all these years(LOL)

Yep, that DNC just duped everybody!

Hillary and the DNC had the primary rigged against Bernie.
 
You seem to be totally not understanding. The reason Hillary got more votes is because her and the DNC had the primaries rigged against Bernie. You're not making any sense.

Yep, the almost 4 million more Hillary voters were helpless controlled Zombies who had no idea who the life long Hillary/Bernie politicians were(LOL)
 
There's gotta be a nasty war going on inside that party!


Lol. That Trump - when he labels someone, it surely sticks! :lamo He called Bloomberg, "Mini-Mike."
Now, even Pocahontas is taking potshots at Bloomberg's height! :mrgreen:



Elizabeth Warrens mocks Michael Bloomberg's height

The nicknames DJT assigns is their own fault. I think they are funny as hell. And I love it when he fights back and the left is so thin skinned they make it worse on themselves.
 
I would like to see Sanders as the nominee but my gut tells me he is going to get robbed, Again. And his supporters will retaliate buy the hundreds of thousands.

If Sanders gets a plurality of the delegates and the DNC gives the nomination to someone else, that will virtually guarantee Trump another 4 years in office.
 
oh yeah, its not like BIAS in the DNC could help you win those or anything.

Yes, it had more swagger than who the lifelong politicians already were
(LOL)
 
If Sanders gets a plurality of the delegates and the DNC gives the nomination to someone else, that will virtually guarantee Trump another 4 years in office.

They have worked themselves into a catch 22. Even if Sanders wins the nomination, he can't beat Trump. Even the DNC and the other candidates know this.
 
If Sanders gets a plurality of the delegates and the DNC gives the nomination to someone else, that will virtually guarantee Trump another 4 years in office.

I read an article this morning saying, Sanders says winning a plurality of delegates is good enough for the nomination. His rivals say a majority is needed.
 
The nicknames DJT assigns is their own fault. I think they are funny as hell. And I love it when he fights back and the left is so thin skinned they make it worse on themselves.

I think Trump enjoys trolling them! :lol:
 
Biden is going to get enough delegates the first vote will just be a formality.



That's my assessment and guess/bet/prediction. There is still enough risk for those in party power to be on the edge of their seats, biting their nails and suffering GI contortion. That's the part I love.
 
You go, Sanders!

You're rocking! BUT - they're bringing up the Super Delegates!

This is your last chance at this. So......

Don't let them cheat you......again! :lol:
You want the DNC to appease the same man by changing the very rules that Saint Bernard pushed for?! :lamo
 
You want the DNC to appease the same man by changing the very rules that Saint Bernard pushed for?! :lamo
:shock:

Btw, I didn't say, "appease."
 
:shock:

Btw, I didn't say, "appease."

You want the silent majority of Democrats to capitulate to an arrogant, loud-mouthed blowhard who can't even tell how to find the trillions of dollars he would need to pay for his pie-in-the-sky plans. :lol:

Furthermore, as Elizabeth Warren rightly pointed out the other night, Saint Bernard has flip-flopped on his position on delegates. During the 2016 campaign he wanted the supers to go to the second-place candidate. Now he's back to claiming that a plurality is enough. God what a tool he is :mrgreen:
 
You want the silent majority of Democrats to capitulate to an arrogant, loud-mouthed blowhard who can't even tell how to find the trillions of dollars he would need to pay for his pie-in-the-sky plans. :lol:

Furthermore, as Elizabeth Warren rightly pointed out the other night, Saint Bernard has flip-flopped on his position on delegates. During the 2016 campaign he wanted the supers to go to the second-place candidate. Now he's back to claiming that a plurality is enough. God what a tool he is :mrgreen:

:roll:

Will you go back and read. Discussing policies on this thread, are irrelevant.



Anyway.....what silent "majority" are you on about? Those who didn't cast their vote?

So far, Sanders is leading, am I right?
So - right now, the majority that's voted so far had chosen him.

Everyone's gunning for Sanders right now. You know why?
Because they want to stop his developing momentum. Will the attacks work?
Let's wait and see for the results of the upcoming elections.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom