I see that the "Russia" hysteria is re emerging, thus the question. Have at it
One of the things about the Russian interference in 2016 that is seldom talked about is that they were doing much the same for the Sanders campaign. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were interfering on his behalf again in the 2020 primary.
The Russians were not interfering on behalf of Bernie Sanders. It was a matter of coincidence that Russian interference accurately revealed the DNC directly interfering with the 2016 primaries to assist the Clinton campaign.
I see that the "Russia" hysteria is re emerging, thus the question. Have at it
They were interfering on behalf of Bernie Sanders. Mueller laid this out in his indictment of 13 Russian nationals.
Sanders is more likely to listen to the USIC and the USDOD than knowsitall TrumpI see that the "Russia" hysteria is re emerging, thus the question. Have at it
I see that the "Russia" hysteria is re emerging, thus the question. Have at it
If O'Malley pulled ahead to have been a contender against Clinton, and the DNC had started to purposefully rig the primary against him in 2016, the Russians would have "helped O'Malley" too. It was a matter of convenience. Did you bother with even the cliff notes of what was in those 40,000 emails the Russians gathered through hacking, or would that get in the way of your narrative?
Because Sanders isn’t an autocrat, a plutocrat or a fascist.
The facts don’t care about your feelings for Sanders. The Russians helped his campaign early on and while O’Malley was still in the race.
I've never understood why Russia/Putin would have preferred Trump, a loose cannon who no one can control, and not Hillary, who could be bought for the price of a couple of Bill speeches.
You're absolutely high out of your mind if you think that A) The Russians went out of their way to help Sanders and B) thought O'Malley was ever a contender.
Get back in touch with reality. You're not helping anyone by wilfully keeping yourself ignorant to election interference.
I see that the "Russia" hysteria is re emerging, thus the question. Have at it
Are you accusing Mueller of lying in his indictment of those Russian nationals?
It is hyphenated, actually.I see that the "Russia" hysteria is re emerging, thus the question. Have at it
The mission of the Russians is most likely to keep factions of the US going at each other, thus less public attention will be paid to their own mischievous actions. When you find yourself up to your ass amongst angry alligators, it is much harder to remember that your mission was simply to drain the swamp.
I'm accusing you of lying. Because that's something you routinely do.
The mission of the Russians is most likely to keep factions of the US going at each other, thus less public attention will be paid to their own mischievous actions. When you find yourself up to your ass amongst angry alligators, it is much harder to remember that your mission was simply to drain the swamp.
It’s right there in Mueller’s indictment.
You're misrepresenting Muller's statement by omitting key details. Can you not even address that the Russians interfered in our elections by exposing 40,000 emails that revealed the DNC worked against Bernie's campaign because of direct financial ties to Hillary Clinton?
Too bad Trump hasn't drained the swamp, he has just dumped raw sewage in it and continues to do so while mindless Republicans cheer him on with catch phrases like "MAGA", "KAG" and "Fake News".
I'm accusing you of lying. Because that's something you routinely do.