• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

BREAKING: Durham has interviewed several of the FBI investigators who worked on Mueller's team

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
BREAKING: Durham has interviewed several of the FBI investigators who worked on Mueller's team during his 2017-2018 inquiry, further suggesting Durham's probe may be expanding into the activities of the Special Counsel's office

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1229959474577891330

Tick, tick, tick...

That investigation should have been closed on Mueller’s 1st day.

They had nothing but went on a witch hunt.

Now it looks like the Corruptniks are in the crosshairs.

In the words of Borat... Niiiice... Liiiike...
 
What is breaking about this. This is what Dirtbag Donnie and Bull Crap Bill said he would do.

Tick, tick, tick....to the end of this nonsense without Donnie getting trash for his disinformation apparatus which is ALL this is about.
 
Tick, tick, tick...

That investigation should have been closed on Mueller’s 1st day.

They had nothing but went on a witch hunt.

Now it looks like the Corruptniks are in the crosshairs.

In the words of Borat... Niiiice... Liiiike...

GowdyBenghazi-1000x600.jpg
 
Tick, tick, tick...

That investigation should have been closed on Mueller’s 1st day.

They had nothing but went on a witch hunt.

Now it looks like the Corruptniks are in the crosshairs.

In the words of Borat... Niiiice... Liiiike...

Another tweet from Paul Sperry as "BREAKING" news. :lol:

In the past 24 hours he sure has a lot of breaking stories that are not verified.
 
Tick, tick, tick...

That investigation should have been closed on Mueller’s 1st day.

They had nothing but went on a witch hunt.

Now it looks like the Corruptniks are in the crosshairs.

In the words of Borat... Niiiice... Liiiike...
To date, every politically motivated investigation the Trump administration has conducted ended with no charges filed, crushing Trumpsters hopes of watching “never Trumpers” being hauled away to prison.
 
Wow Durham is really moving along!!!!
 
Another tweet from Paul Sperry as "BREAKING" news. :lol:

In the past 24 hours he sure has a lot of breaking stories that are not verified.

Well... your Goebbels Media ran all manner of stories during the past 3 to 4 years with the line... “sources say”... or “a source says”.

The difference is these stories amounted to nothing...

...now the tables have turned and Democrats know... their coup attempts are being exposed.

The IG Report, which keeps dripping info... was the first shot...

Buckle UP!!! I hope you like bumpy rides... because it’s gonna be a bumpy ride for your clan.
 
Last edited:
Well... your Goebbels Media ran all manner of stories during the past 3 to 4 years with the line... “sources say”... or “a source says”.

The difference is these stories amounted to nothing...

...now the tables have turned and Democrats know... their coup attempts are being exposed.

The IG Report, which keeps dripping info... was the first shot...

Buckle UP!!! I hope you like bumpy rides... because it’s gonna be a bumpy ride for your clan.

That (bolded above) sounds ominous until one examines the McCabe "case" of the IG identifying "clearly criminal" conduct which resulted in exactly zero prosecution. The basic problem is getting those underlings (or supposed overseers) to testify that they assisted (or stood silently by and allowed) them to do something criminal (for years?) - how, exactly, is that going work without offering amnesty to a significant number alleged co-conspirators?
 
Well... your Goebbels Media ran all manner of stories during the past 3 to 4 years with the line... “sources say”... or “a source says”.

The difference is these stories amounted to nothing...

...now the tables have turned and Democrats know... their coup attempts are being exposed.

The IG Report, which keeps dripping info... was the first shot...

Buckle UP!!! I hope you like bumpy rides... because it’s gonna be a bumpy ride for your clan.

The road to disappointment.
 
Tick, tick, tick...

That investigation should have been closed on Mueller’s 1st day.

They had nothing but went on a witch hunt.

Now it looks like the Corruptniks are in the crosshairs.

In the words of Borat... Niiiice... Liiiike...

And the powers to be will continue to until the wicked witch is dead. At least she lost in 2016.
 
Well... your Goebbels Media ran all manner of stories during the past 3 to 4 years with the line... “sources say”... or “a source says”.

The difference is these stories amounted to nothing...

...now the tables have turned and Democrats know... their coup attempts are being exposed.

The IG Report, which keeps dripping info... was the first shot...

Buckle UP!!! I hope you like bumpy rides... because it’s gonna be a bumpy ride for your clan.

First shot? You're a hoot.

You didn't catch Hillary. You didn't catch Comey. You didn't catch McCabe. You didn't catch the FISA court. You can't catch Hunter or Joe. You won't catch Obama.

Your like a chihuahua with no teeth. All squeaky bark, no bite.
 
I'm sure they'll be locking Hillary up any day now.
 
First shot? You're a hoot.

You didn't catch Hillary. You didn't catch Comey. You didn't catch McCabe. You didn't catch the FISA court. You can't catch Hunter or Joe. You won't catch Obama.

Your like a chihuahua with no teeth. All squeaky bark, no bite.

Says the toothless dog who didnt catch Trump...
 
You can't catch Trump because you can't indict him. We know why the Senate didn't catch Trump. They don't want to get primaried.

No, the dems didnt make their case. To get the senate to vote for removal, you have to first move public opinion. That didnt happen. Thats why he is still there.
 
No, the dems didnt make their case. To get the senate to vote for removal, you have to first move public opinion. That didnt happen. Thats why he is still there.

Is that why some senators believed the case was made but didn't rise to level of removal?

You're right about public opinion. They didn't move it, or so it seems. Trump still has the November jury to face.
 
Is that why some senators believed the case was made but didn't rise to level of removal?

You're right about public opinion. They didn't move it, or so it seems. Trump still has the November jury to face.

Sure. Its possible to believe that what Trump did was wrong but not something for which he should be removed. Maybe if dems had completed the investigation, got witnesses on record testifying against Trump, you might have gotten him. But the dems were in such big a hurry to impeach they forgot to make their case.
 
That (bolded above) sounds ominous until one examines the McCabe "case" of the IG identifying "clearly criminal" conduct which resulted in exactly zero prosecution. The basic problem is getting those underlings (or supposed overseers) to testify that they assisted (or stood silently by and allowed) them to do something criminal (for years?) - how, exactly, is that going work without offering amnesty to a significant number alleged co-conspirators?

Here is the problem Comey set a new standard in government malfeasance when he let hillary walk He created the "I didn't intend" defense. Which basically allows for any criminal
behavior as long as the person didn't intend to do it. In fact that was McCabe's entire defense. I didn't intend to lie or mislead investigators but i did it anyway knowing i was doing it.

This whole intent thing has opened up a free pass as an excuse when there are some laws that do not require intent.
 
Here is the problem Comey set a new standard in government malfeasance when he let hillary walk He created the "I didn't intend" defense. Which basically allows for any criminal
behavior as long as the person didn't intend to do it. In fact that was McCabe's entire defense. I didn't intend to lie or mislead investigators but i did it anyway knowing i was doing it.

This whole intent thing has opened up a free pass as an excuse when there are some laws that do not require intent.

I think it is more basic than that - how would one then justify not prosecuting any (and all) "leakers" of information about ongoing federal investigations as well as those (in the media) who helped to disclose them? Once a precedent is set then it's hard to get all of that toothpaste back into the tube, meaning that the "just us" system (and the press using "unnamed sources" inside the DOJ?) would be forever changed.
 
Sure. Its possible to believe that what Trump did was wrong but not something for which he should be removed. Maybe if dems had completed the investigation, got witnesses on record testifying against Trump, you might have gotten him. But the dems were in such big a hurry to impeach they forgot to make their case.

If the House would have pursued the court route to enforcing subpoenas we'd likely still be waiting. The senate wouldn't have that problem with the Chief Justice presiding but blaming the House carried the day.
 
Tick, tick, tick...

That investigation should have been closed on Mueller’s 1st day.

They had nothing but went on a witch hunt.

Now it looks like the Corruptniks are in the crosshairs.

In the words of Borat... Niiiice... Liiiike...

There's a lot of leftists currently imbedded like a bunch of ticks sucking taxpayer's money up that need to go to jail.
 
I think it is more basic than that - how would one then justify not prosecuting any (and all) "leakers" of information about ongoing federal investigations as well as those (in the media) who helped to disclose them? Once a precedent is set then it's hard to get all of that toothpaste back into the tube, meaning that the "just us" system (and the press using "unnamed sources" inside the DOJ?) would be forever changed.

The FREE press using sources, named and unnamed all across government is about the only way we find out anything about how our government operates now that government "officials" seem to feel free to just utterly ignore congressional inquiry and lie to prosecutors.

THE REAL problem is that we have given over government to thugs and criminals and other unscrupulous types. We are well on the way to Autocracy and the other utterly corrupt government forms that put us on the road to Putin's Russia or Xi's China...take your pick.

There were enough decent people left in government and politics to hold the line against Nixon. There were even enough to hold the line against Iran/Contra. There were not enough to care about Bush 41 and Panama. But who cares about Panama right!

By Bush 43 we were so accommodating to this nonsense that we allowed Dick Cheney and John Bolton to work us up to a war intended to destabilize the Middle East and that it surely did. The only thing that went wrong for those two jokers is that Iran didn't take the bait. But we can never get enough of destabilizing the Middle East now can we.

Now its a full blown thug show with Donnie Durtbag at its head and untold numbers of whack jobs working for him. Why has so much abuse come at the hands of GOP administrations? BECAUSE THEY DO NOT BELIEVE IN GOVERNMENT....any government. They only reason Dems corruption has not reached the astounding levels of Republican and now T-party corruption is that Dems generally do believe in government which tempers the amount of corruption they are capable of committing. It is the one thing that makes all of these false equivalencies foisted on us by the "whataboutism Right" FALSE.
 
Last edited:
If the House would have pursued the court route to enforcing subpoenas we'd likely still be waiting.
Then you wait. Thats how it works.
The senate wouldn't have that problem with the Chief Justice presiding but blaming the House carried the day.
I dont think Roberts could have or would have ruled on executive privilege arguments. Thats not his role. It didnt matter since you didnt get the votes to call witnesses anyway.
 
Back
Top Bottom