- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Messages
- 20,269
- Reaction score
- 28,072
- Location
- Mid-West USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Well, I've seen some opponents of Trump cite Judge Napolitano as being "fair and impartial" when he's made comments in opposition to Trump.
Now this:
For those of you wondering who this jury member is, and what they are talking about, here is a story about her:
Then here is a source for her "tweets":
https://twitter.com/search?q=from:hartformemphis trump&src=typed_query
Clearly a history of anti-Trump "opinion."
Now she served as the jury Foreman during Stone's trial, and she is also an attorney. That means she had a lot of influence on the direction that jury would take, with additional "credibility" when commenting on legal opinion/interpretation.
I agree that Stone has a good case for a retrial.
Now this:
For those of you wondering who this jury member is, and what they are talking about, here is a story about her:
Tomeka Hart: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.comTomeka Hart was the foreperson on the Roger Stone jury. She is also a former Memphis school board member who has written a slew of political posts on social media, some of them negative to President Donald Trump...She wasn’t the only juror harboring such views. Another Stone juror was an “Obama-era press official with admitted anti-Trump views,”...
Then here is a source for her "tweets":
https://twitter.com/search?q=from:hartformemphis trump&src=typed_query
Clearly a history of anti-Trump "opinion."
Now she served as the jury Foreman during Stone's trial, and she is also an attorney. That means she had a lot of influence on the direction that jury would take, with additional "credibility" when commenting on legal opinion/interpretation.
I agree that Stone has a good case for a retrial.
Last edited: