• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

poll: 75% of American voters want impeachment witnesses

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,844
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
New Quinnipiac poll: 75% of American voters want impeachment witnesses

No wonder Mitch can't whip up 51 votes for "no" on the Witness question. :)

The Quinnipiac poll found registered voters nationwide favoring impeachment trial witnesses by a 75 to 20 percent split, with just 5 percent undecided.

Broken down by party, even Republican respondents favored witnesses, with a plurality of 49 percent saying yes, and 42 percent saying no. Ninety-five percent of Democrats said yes. Seventy-five percent of independent voters said yes.

At least 60 percent of every demographic group broken out in the poll — men or women; white, black, or Hispanic voters; voters of each age bracket — said yes, there should be witnesses.
 
I agree.Lets call the Bidens,Schiff,Comey and many others testify.
 
Trump supporters dropping from 30% to 20%. I see it here too.
 
I agree.Lets call the Bidens,Schiff,Comey and many others testify.

I'm with you, lets trot em all through this trial. But, if that were to happen (never going to happen, Moscow Mitch will see to that.) I guarantee you tRump would come out the loser. IF they really asked pertinent honest questions, the Biden's would be exonerated, Schiff would look dignified, Comey would show his patriotism, and Bolden would make tRump look so bad that he might actually get convicted of the Articles of Impeachment.

But to the point of the OP, 75% of AmeriCAN's are going to be disappointed and 100% of AmeriCAN's are going to be cheated out of a fair trial. But we knew that going in.
 
I agree.Lets call the Bidens,Schiff,Comey and many others testify.

Testify about what, the price of tea in China?

When a person is on trial for murder, they do not call the dog catcher working two towns over as a witness. :roll:
 
Testify about what, the price of tea in China?

When a person is on trial for murder, they do not call the dog catcher working two towns over as a witness. :roll:

The Democrats do
 
Testify about what, the price of tea in China?

When a person is on trial for murder, they do not call the dog catcher working two towns over as a witness. :roll:

uh oh...you arent scared of the Bidens under oath are ya?
 
uh oh...you arent scared of the Bidens under oath are ya?

I don't give a flying **** about the Bidens. The only good Joe has done is make Trump do something dumb which, come to think of it, maybe puts him in my hall of fame. :)
 
I don't give a flying **** about the Bidens. The only good Joe has done is make Trump do something dumb which, come to think of it, maybe puts him in my hall of fame. :)

Then you don't have an issue with him testifying right?
 
uh oh...you arent scared of the Bidens under oath are ya?
How is Biden (father or son) relevant to the fact that Trump attempted to abuse his power by strong arming the leader of another country to announce an investigation into a potential political opponent for his own personal political benefit relevant?

If questioning the Biden’s under oath means Americans get to witness Bolton and Mulvaney also being questioned under oath, I’d be 100% up for it. :thumbs:
 
How is Biden (father or son) relevant to the fact that Trump attempted to abuse his power by strong arming the leader of another country to announce an investigation into a potential political opponent for his own personal political benefit relevant?

If questioning the Biden’s under oath means Americans get to witness Bolton and Mulvaney also being questioned under oath, I’d be 100% up for it. :thumbs:

How are they relevant? You tell us. The dems brought them up over 400 times. They seem pretty relevant.
 
McConnell says GOP doesn'''t have votes yet to block impeachment witnesses, as Bolton book disrupts trial script | Fox News

While Graham would prefer to conclude the trial without witnesses, he said if the door was open to witnesses, there was "consensus" Republicans wanted more than just Bolton, but the Bidens, the whistleblower and more.

“If you call John Bolton, we’re calling everybody,” Graham said.

I have no doubt that it will be more than just John Bolton who is called. I also have no doubt that by the time it is all said and done, the outcome will not be affected. It is going to get awfully messy, though.

At this point it seems likely that Trump floated the idea of using the aid as some sort of leverage to get to the bottom of what was going on in Ukraine prior to him taking office but stopped just short of actually making it an "official" position. This sort of left the whole ordeal in a cloud of ambiguity. Just my opinion but given the evidence, it seems like the most plausible explanation.
 
How are they relevant? You tell us. The dems brought them up over 400 times. They seem pretty relevant.
I didn’t ask the Democrats, I asked you. Are you unable to provide your own reasoning?
 
I didn’t ask the Democrats, I asked you. Are you unable to provide your own reasoning?

You are asking why the focus of Trumps Ukraine corruption, the very people dems are citing as the reason for impeachment against Trump are relevant? The same people dems brought up 400 times. Good god man...how much more unhinged can the left get? If the bidens were engaged in corrupt activities then Trump is 100% exonerated. They are as relevant as it gets. Next up the whistleblower.
I fear that you are actually serious. How is that possible?
 
You are asking why the focus of Trumps Ukraine corruption, the very people dems are citing as the reason for impeachment against Trump are relevant? The same people dems brought up 400 times. Good god man...how much more unhinged can the left get? If the bidens were engaged in corrupt activities then Trump is 100% exonerated. They are as relevant as it gets. Next up the whistleblower.
I fear that you are actually serious. How is that possible?
Okay, back to reality.

There is zero evidence, much less, even a whiff of evidence, that either Biden was involved in anything that violated Ukrainian or American law.

There is, however, a **** ton load of evidence that Trump pushed for an announcement of an investigation to be to be made specifically to damage/undermine a potential political opponent.
 
Okay, back to reality.

There is zero evidence, much less, even a whiff of evidence, that either Biden was involved in anything that violated Ukrainian or American law.

There is, however, a **** ton load of evidence that Trump pushed for an announcement of an investigation to be to be made specifically to damage/undermine a potential political opponent.

You mean other than the video of ole Joe bragging about using U.S. tax dollars to force a firing of an attorney looking into burisma, the company his son was getting kickbacks for. 0 evidence of Trump. Zeeero.
 
You are asking why the focus of Trumps Ukraine corruption, the very people dems are citing as the reason for impeachment against Trump are relevant? The same people dems brought up 400 times. Good god man...how much more unhinged can the left get? If the bidens were engaged in corrupt activities then Trump is 100% exonerated. They are as relevant as it gets. Next up the whistleblower.
I fear that you are actually serious. How is that possible?

The Senate T-Party fools have all the votes they need to Subpoena whomever they want to. They should put up or SHUT UP. Call the witnesses you sniveling cowards.
 
The Senate T-Party fools have all the votes they need to Subpoena whomever they want to. They should put up or SHUT UP. Call the witnesses you sniveling cowards.

Hey, I'd love to get the witnesses on the stand. Especially the whistleblower.
 
Hey, I'd love to get the witnesses on the stand. Especially the whistleblower.

But you and i don't get to Subpoena anybody. its the sniveling GOP Senate cowards who are squirming and trying to avoid witnesses and documents. They have the votes. They can just call whomever they want. BUT NOOOOOO.... Too gutless.
 
uh oh...you arent scared of the Bidens under oath are ya?

Well i have no problem with the bidens testifying. Only thing is they have nothing to do with trump withholding money from the Ucraine. They will be raked over the coals like grandstanding senators do but nothing of substance will come from it. They have already been cleared of any wrongdoing in Ucraine

Now the wistleblower all he did was bring attention to trumps crimes. He has little to add either. Trump just wants to punish him.
 
But you and i don't get to Subpoena anybody. its the sniveling GOP Senate cowards who are squirming and trying to avoid witnesses and documents. They have the votes. They can just call whomever they want. BUT NOOOOOO.... Too gutless.

Lets face it....dems don't want witnesses either. They are banking on the repubs not calling them so they can point the finger and cry unfair. Witnesses will go real bad for the Dems especially the Bidens.
 
Back
Top Bottom