• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

You want evidence? Bolton book outlines Trump is guilty

OscarLevant said:
Trumpsters, suck on this....




DIRECT EVIDENCE.
Click to expand...

Poor Bolton. Trump wouldn't give him the war he wanted so he's stomping his feet in futile rage. On that point, it's amazing to see the left sell their souls in their manic quest to get Trump. The Dems have now become the party of all the things they've been purported to oppose; corporatism, war and the DC establishment. When they are jumping into bed with John Bolton because they think it helps them hurt Trump, they've finally hit bottom on the hypocrisy and cynicism scale. The DC establishment opposes Trump because he's upsetting their lucrative war gravy train. They oppose him because of policy and the left is happy to flip flop and support these people because they have a common objective. Power and greed make strange bedfellows.
 
iguanaman said:
Like I said, there was no signed agreement for cooperation and that is required to charge conspiracy. Mueller also said his investigation was hampered by lying and destruction of evidence so that it might not be complete.

Click to expand...


Testimony before the Senate today proved beyond doubt that democrats have been lying about the Bidens the whole time. Unfortunately for them, they cannot manipulate the evidence and hide facts they want hidden now that Trump's lawyers are allowed to present a defense. Trump's lawyers proved before the Senate today that the Bidens are guilty and that Trump had every justifiable reason to ask Zelensky to investigated the crimes for the benefit of the American people.
 
humbolt said:
After what occurred in the House, which you have aggressively supported here, you have no standing to lecture me on moral behavior. When GOP witnesses are only permitted with Schiff approval, you have no standing. When GOP witnesses, subpoenaed or not, are not permitted counsel, you have no standing. When transcripts of testimony are prevented from release by Schiff, you have no standing. When the chairman of the committee charged with directing the investigation in the House lies about contact with the primary witness, you have no standing to lecture anyone anywhere about morality. And I can go on with the above.

With your record here, and that of those you support, don't presume to comment on any aspect of the morality of others. You aren't qualified.
Click to expand...

Suh-Mack
 
bubbabgone said:
no no. if you really want witnesses you start with the WB. you know ... since that's where it all started.
Click to expand...

That's moronic and about only revenge. None of the evidence against Trump came from the WB; not a single piece. Congress is accusing the President, not the WB.

The WB has absolutely no relevance. It's sick to seek revenge and undermine our WB system. It's unAmerican and it's fascist.
 
bubbabgone said:
no no. if you really want witnesses you start with the WB. you know ... since that's where it all started.
Click to expand...

I am fine with calling him. Closed circuit tv with appearance distorted.


Then call Bolton and Mulvaney
 
ecofarm said:
That's moronic and about only revenge. None of the evidence against Trump came from the WB; not a single piece. Congress is accusing the President, not the WB.

The WB has absolutely no relevance. It's sick to seek revenge and undermine our WB system. It's unAmerican and it's fascist.
Click to expand...

I guess you haven't heard more about the WB. You should be curious.
 
vegas giants said:
I am fine with calling him. Closed circuit tv with appearance distorted.


Then call Bolton and Mulvaney
Click to expand...

We already know what he looks like. Unless you believe the reports are wrong.
No need to make believe he needs protection.
 
bubbabgone said:
I guess you haven't heard more about the WB. You should be curious.
Click to expand...

Why? I'm not some revenge driven America-hater. I understand the importance of our WB system and how your asinine demands undermine it. Further, the WB provided none of the evidence against Trump - none at all. And the WB is not accusing Trump, Congress is accusing Trump.

There is absolutely no ****ing reason to divulge the identity except so scum can seek revenge and the WB system is undermined.

You know who would love to undermine our WB system for no ****ing reason at all? Russia. You best check where you get your dumbass rhetoric.
 
bubbabgone said:
We already know what he looks like. Unless you believe the reports are wrong.
No need to make believe he needs protection.
Click to expand...

No. His ID would be protected. Even Monica got to appear by closed circuit tv.

Bolton and Mulvaney can appear in person
 
veritas1 said:
Poor Bolton. Trump wouldn't give him the war he wanted so he's stomping his feet in futile rage. On that point, it's amazing to see the left sell their souls in their manic quest to get Trump. The Dems have now become the party of all the things they've been purported to oppose; corporatism, war and the DC establishment. When they are jumping into bed with John Bolton because they think it helps them hurt Trump, they've finally hit bottom on the hypocrisy and cynicism scale. The DC establishment opposes Trump because he's upsetting their lucrative war gravy train. They oppose him because of policy and the left is happy to flip flop and support these people because they have a common objective. Power and greed make strange bedfellows.
Click to expand...



Nothing in your comment refutes the OP.

Nice predictable rant, though.
 
marke said:
Trump lawyers on the floor of the Senate today exposed the democrat cover-up of the Biden crimes, thus destroying any possibility of accusing Trump of wrongdoing for asking Zelenski to further investigate their criminal activities in Ukraine.
Click to expand...

In your imagination, perhaps.
 
bubbabgone said:
I guess you haven't heard more about the WB. You should be curious.
Click to expand...

3d31b24bfcd43867805f511bce225352.jpg
 
humbolt said:
You might want to provide a rebuttal to my assertions in my previous post to you rather than engaging in disparaging remarks about something the content of which you're clearly unqualified to comment. Billy Bob.
Click to expand...



"Billy Bob" ?

Impressive.

All that education wasted. Sad.
 
iguanaman said:
Witnesses that testify that Trump was tying aid to Biden investigations are evidence of quid pro quo. Mulvaney also tied the aid to investigations and told us to deal with it.
Click to expand...

No they didn't. No none of them testified to anything like that.
A lot of them speculated that was the cause but none of them actually
had any evidence to prove that it was.

In fact none of them had any evidence at all as they all testified.

Speculation is not allowed as evidence. neither is hearsay.
 
iguanaman said:
Biden cannot testify in a trial when he has no relevance to the charges. The #1 rule of evidence is relevance.
Click to expand...

Says the people that say hearsay and speculation is evidence.
lol hypocrisy at it's finest.
 
ecofarm said:
Why? I'm not some revenge driven America-hater. I understand the importance of our WB system and how your asinine demands undermine it. Further, the WB provided none of the evidence against Trump - none at all. And the WB is not accusing Trump, Congress is accusing Trump.

There is absolutely no ****ing reason to divulge the identity except so scum can seek revenge and the WB system is undermined.

You know who would love to undermine our WB system for no ****ing reason at all? Russia. You best check where you get your dumbass rhetoric.
Click to expand...

So you don't know any more about the so-called whistleblower and you're determined to keep it that way.
 
OscarLevant said:
"Billy Bob" ?

Impressive.

All that education wasted. Sad.
Click to expand...

You might be incapable of following a conversation, and I'm being generous by including the remote possibility that you aren't.
 
vegas giants said:
No. His ID would be protected. Even Monica got to appear by closed circuit tv.

Bolton and Mulvaney can appear in person
Click to expand...

We already have his ID.
After what we've learned about him, you & others should suspect why Adam Schiff was so defensive about approaching the subject during depositions and why he won't release the transcript of the ICIG testimony.
It wasn't the WB program or the WB he's been protecting.
 
bubbabgone said:
We already have his ID.
After what we've learned about him, you & others should suspect why Adam Schiff was so defensive about approaching the subject during depositions and why he won't release the transcript of the ICIG testimony.
It wasn't the WB program or the WB he's been protecting.
Click to expand...

That is factually incorrect. His ID is still being protected despite those who wish to speculate on who he is
 
bubbabgone said:
Eric Ciaramella. There. Now we can talk seriously.
Click to expand...

The official position of the US government is that the whistleblowers identity will remain protected.


Now. Deny that
 
bubbabgone said:
Eric Ciaramella. There. Now we can talk seriously.
Click to expand...

Feigned ignorance is a badge of honor for many on the left. Yuckity yuck, yuck, yuck. Even Schiff plays it up as if someone believes his lying ass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom