• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republican lawmakers are forced to lie to the American people

Let's assume that lying is a symptom of a disease. Let's further assume that it can spread from person to person.

Have the lawyers who are presenting President of the United States of America Donald Trump's case been near him lately?
 
Bullseye said:
LOL, not even close. Wishful thinking does not comprise evidence.
Click to expand...

The transcript is plenty of evidence enough in any court of law. If it does not count as evidence in the today’s US Senate, it is because it is corrupt. And I don’t care that Fox News is telling you otherwise repeatedly.

LOL, the Parnas tape means squat. Trump has the power to dismiss an ambassador for any reason, or for no reason.
Click to expand...

Of coarse. But when we clearly know the reason, and there are so many witnesses and evidence for it, and that reason is corrupt, that is an impeachable offense.

Having a good reason, or having no reason at all, is fine. A clearly corrupt reason, however, is not.
 
ataraxia said:
The transcript is plenty of evidence enough in any court of law. If it does not count as evidence in the today’s US Senate, it is because it is corrupt. And I don’t care that Fox News is telling you otherwise repeatedly.
Click to expand...
WHAT transcript? "do is a favor"? Is that what you standing on?


ataraxia said:
Of coarse. But when we clearly know the reason, and there are so many witnesses and evidence for it, and that reason is corrupt, that is an impeachable offense.
Click to expand...
We don't know anything "clearly". We know only what the evidence shows; which is nothing other than a few butthurt bureaucrats didn't like or disagree with.



ataraxiaHaving said:
] a good reason, or having no reason at all, is fine. A clearly corrupt reason, however, is not.
Click to expand...
That's an unproven supposition.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom