• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Recorded Telling Parnas and Fruman to "Get Rid" of Yovanovitch in April 2018

digitusmedius

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
13,914
Reaction score
4,086
Location
Oregon
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Last edited:
Keep An Eye On This | Talking Points Memo

I didn't think Trump couldn't be any more thickly coated with slime and guilt than he already was but there it is. So nice of him to leave us such and easy slime trail to follow, too.

Before you click on the link, you have to pay to read it. The OP is click-bait fund raising. Another Democrat starting a thread for which the REAL point is to try to bait people into giving money to a Democratic blogger. VERY disgusting and I do not think this form of advertising and political fund raising is a legitimate reason to start a new thread.
 
:lamo The claimed scandal is Trump fired the ambassador to Ukraine, that Ukraine wanted fired too.
 
Before you click on the link, you have to pay to read it. The OP is click-bait fund raising. Another Democrat starting a thread for which the REAL point is to try to bait people into giving money to a Democratic blogger. VERY disgusting and I do not think this form of advertising and political fund raising is a legitimate reason to start a new thread.

Try this, then and you'll be also treated to a an old video of Dirtbag lying his chicken**** ass off about never knowing Parnas and Fruman:

'''Take her out''': Recording appears to capture Trump at private dinner saying he wants Ukraine ambassador fired - ABC News
 
:lamo The claimed scandal is Trump fired the ambassador to Ukraine, that Ukraine wanted fired too.

Right, the old corrupt regime that was replaced by the reformer Zelensky. Thank you for pointing that out. Again, the :lamo is on you.
 
Keep An Eye On This | Talking Points Memo

I didn't think Trump couldn't be any more thickly coated with slime and guilt than he already was but there it is. So nice of him to leave us such and easy slime trail to follow, too.

This President, as with any other holder of that office, can remove and replace Ambassadors as and when he sees fit.

It is not a "crime" to do so. Period!
 
:lamo The claimed scandal is Trump fired the ambassador to Ukraine, that Ukraine wanted fired too.

Ukraine didn't want her fired, the prior admin wanted her fired, she was an obstacle to their corruption.

Trump could have just fired her. Why did he have to destroy her and smear her and threaten her?

I'll wait.

There's a spot for you on the hill of conservatives that have FAILED this challenge question, right over there. ;)
 
This President, as with any other holder of that office, can remove and replace Ambassadors as and when he sees fit.

It is not a "crime" to do so. Period!

Let's see about you. Want to join the rest of the conservatives?

Yes, he can just fire her.

So why didn't he just fire her?

Why the smear campaign? Why the insults, the threats, the use of non-government officials in a personal errand, to damage her?

Answer away, but tread carefully.
 
This President, as with any other holder of that office, can remove and replace Ambassadors as and when he sees fit.

It is not a "crime" to do so. Period!

But why did he order what sounds like a hit on her and not do it himself? Because he's a coward. Pure chicken**** runs in his veins. He didn't want to do it because he would have had no justifiable reason for doing so and it would have drawn attention to his massively corrupt nature and raised questions. You obviously don't know much about this kind malignant narcissistic personality disorder.
 
Last edited:
Let's see about you. Want to join the rest of the conservatives?

Yes, he can just fire her.

So why didn't he just fire her?

Why the smear campaign? Why the insults, the threats, the use of non-government officials in a personal errand, to damage her?

Answer away, but tread carefully.

And a well-deserved bullseye.png for you. Très bien fait.
 
:lamo The claimed scandal is Trump fired the ambassador to Ukraine, that Ukraine wanted fired too.

LOLOL cause she was naming corrupt names, and the thugs didn't appreciate it! We shouldn't let our Ambassadors call out corruption in a country we pay $100s of millions in aid to every year, if the corrupt thugs running it don't like it! LOLOL!
 
Before you click on the link, you have to pay to read it. The OP is click-bait fund raising. Another Democrat starting a thread for which the REAL point is to try to bait people into giving money to a Democratic blogger. VERY disgusting and I do not think this form of advertising and political fund raising is a legitimate reason to start a new thread.

You're claiming another paywall thst isn't there. Your sorry excuses are getting more snd mire pathetic. Judt admit you don't like the facts for partisan reasons.
 
Ukraine didn't want her fired, the prior admin wanted her fired, she was an obstacle to their corruption.

Trump could have just fired her. Why did he have to destroy her and smear her and threaten her?

I'll wait.

There's a spot for you on the hill of conservatives that have FAILED this challenge question, right over there. ;)

Don't you just have to love joko for providing us so much ammunition?
 
This President, as with any other holder of that office, can remove and replace Ambassadors as and when he sees fit.

It is not a "crime" to do so. Period!

The President can also legally out covert operatives in another country! So clearly if it's not a "crime," then it is, therefore, OK!
 
You're claiming another paywall thst isn't there. Your sorry excuses are getting more snd mire pathetic. Judt admit you don't like the facts for partisan reasons.

 
This President, as with any other holder of that office, can remove and replace Ambassadors as and when he sees fit.

It is not a "crime" to do so. Period!

It's true he can. Why didn't he just do it then? I mean, easy, it's within his power to fire her so just do it.

He wanted to be able to do a character assassination though. Class act, your Messiah.
 
It's a pattern with him. He doesn't like it, so he claims a nonexistent paywall

Nothing about joko's dirty little tricks really surprises me, despite the Gomer Pyle link. I just thought the occasion called for it.
 
Last edited:
Trump talks and acts like the head of some organized crime family. He needs to be removed ASAP.
 
Keep An Eye On This | Talking Points Memo

I didn't think Trump couldn't be any more thickly coated with slime and guilt than he already was but there it is. So nice of him to leave us such and easy slime trail to follow, too.

It's been pointed out that that link is blocked so here's a more direct one:

'''Take her out''': Recording appears to capture Trump at private dinner saying he wants Ukraine ambassador fired - ABC News

1. Have you heard the tape? Do you know that Trump actually told Parnas and Fruman to get rid of Yonanovitch?

2. But think about it...what kind of power do those two guys have to fire an Ambassador? None that I know of.

3. That means it's more likely Trump was telling someone else to get rid of Yonavovitch.

4. Getting rid of her is something the President has the power to order done.

So...given all that, what's the big deal?
 
1. Have you heard the tape? Do you know that Trump actually told Parnas and Fruman to get rid of Yonanovitch?

2. But think about it...what kind of power do those two guys have to fire an Ambassador? None that I know of.

3. That means it's more likely Trump was telling someone else to get rid of Yonavovitch.

4. Getting rid of her is something the President has the power to order done.

So...given all that, what's the big deal?

You're always so impatient. Calm down and stay tuned. We'll be getting more corroboration and then you can do what you always do and deny the facts.
 
You're always so impatient. Calm down and stay tuned. We'll be getting more corroboration and then you can do what you always do and deny the facts.

Okay. Then you should follow your own advice and drop this topic until you've actually heard the tape, right?
 
Back
Top Bottom