• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why is Tulsi suing Hillary?

GreatNews2night

GreatNews2night

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 24, 2014
Messages
8,761
Reaction score
3,312
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Democratic White House contender Gabbard sues Hillary Clinton for '''Russian asset''' comment

This lawsuit seems doomed. See this:

[FONT=&quot]U.S. courts have said "rhetorical hyperbole" associated with politics is constitutionally protected speech.[/FONT]
Click to expand...

Imagine if every politician sued an adversary who uses some sort of hyperbole in attacks.

Tulsi is polling in low single digits. Is she just trying to remain relevant? Or is she trying to ingratiate herself to the right wing just like with her "present" vote? What does she want? A cabinet position in Trump's second term?
 
GreatNews2night said:
Democratic White House contender Gabbard sues Hillary Clinton for '''Russian asset''' comment

This lawsuit seems doomed. See this:



Imagine if every politician sued an adversary who uses some sort of hyperbole in attacks.

Tulsi is polling in low single digits. Is she just trying to remain relevant? Or is she trying to ingratiate herself to the right wing just like with her "present" vote? What does she want? A cabinet position in Trump's second term?
Click to expand...

She's suing her over false allegations she made against her. That's it. No other sneaky master plan.
 
GreatNews2night said:
Democratic White House contender Gabbard sues Hillary Clinton for '''Russian asset''' comment

This lawsuit seems doomed. See this:



Imagine if every politician sued an adversary who uses some sort of hyperbole in attacks.

Tulsi is polling in low single digits. Is she just trying to remain relevant? Or is she trying to ingratiate herself to the right wing just like with her "present" vote? What does she want? A cabinet position in Trump's second term?
Click to expand...

Why?

She dumb.
 
GreatNews2night said:
Democratic White House contender Gabbard sues Hillary Clinton for '''Russian asset''' comment

This lawsuit seems doomed. See this:



Imagine if every politician sued an adversary who uses some sort of hyperbole in attacks.

Tulsi is polling in low single digits. Is she just trying to remain relevant? Or is she trying to ingratiate herself to the right wing just like with her "present" vote? What does she want? A cabinet position in Trump's second term?
Click to expand...

A woman who has otherwise faithfully served her country and put her life on the line for it was unironically and openly accused of being an agent of a hostile foreign government by a major political figure without evidence beyond believing in an isolationist foreign policy that tangentially benefits the Russian Federation. I think she has a decent case.
 
Winston said:
She's suing her over false allegations she made against her. That's it. No other sneaky master plan.
Click to expand...

A politician with no sneaky master plan? LOL, are you naive or something?

Oh. You are.
 
Felis Leo said:
A woman who has otherwise faithfully served her country and put her life on the line for it was unironically and openly accused of being an agent of a hostile foreign government without evidence beyond believing in an isolationist foreign policy that tangentially benefits the Russian Federation. I think she has a decent case.
Click to expand...

No decent case. It's constitutionally protected speech. Political hyperbole is not really defamation.

I think Tulsi just wants to posture. She knows she won't win the lawsuit. You know that to win, she needs to prove malicious intent, right? The intent behind a political agenda is not considered to be malicious intent, in similar cases. There's been jurisprudence about it already.
 
In an ideal world, Clinton would get the wall.
 
Why?

She is secretly mentored by Devin Nunes. They make a heck of a pair.
 
Tulsi must have made it plain she wouldn't be playing the establishment games the other stuffed shirts are. They (the DNC) don't like independent thinkers at all. See Bernie/2016.
 
GreatNews2night said:
Democratic White House contender Gabbard sues Hillary Clinton for '''Russian asset''' comment

This lawsuit seems doomed. See this:



Imagine if every politician sued an adversary who uses some sort of hyperbole in attacks.

Tulsi is polling in low single digits. Is she just trying to remain relevant? Or is she trying to ingratiate herself to the right wing just like with her "present" vote? What does she want? A cabinet position in Trump's second term?
Click to expand...

i give Tulsi the benefit of the doubt because she's smoking hot and Hillary is a hideous evil crone.
 
Mashmont said:
i give Tulsi the benefit of the doubt because she's smoking hot and Hillary is a hideous evil crone.
Click to expand...

Isn't there a commandment about coveting?
 
Mashmont said:
i give Tulsi the benefit of the doubt because she's smoking hot and Hillary is a hideous evil crone.
Click to expand...

/// I give Tulsi the benefit because she's smoking hot. /// Matthew 5:28... ( lust and adultery )
 
For a few ($50M?) dollars more is my best guess. Great deal (retirement plan?) if she can prevail.
 
Mashmont said:
i give Tulsi the benefit of the doubt because she's smoking hot and Hillary is a hideous evil crone.
Click to expand...

Oh, is this how you gauge politicians? On whether or not they are hot?

Hey, now I understand why you love Trump so much. You find him hot, huh?

Hint: that orange fatso is anything but hot, but I guess there is a taste for everything.
 
Winston said:
She's suing her over false allegations she made against her. That's it. No other sneaky master plan.
Click to expand...

Hillary Clinton never said her name and never described the alleged candidate with any degree of specificity that people would know that was who she was talking about.. Jill Stein was the only person she spoke of by name in the segment that is the subject of the lawsuit. I would be surprised if this case doesn't get tossed out at the first hearing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom