• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Barr should resign

FinnFox

FinnFox

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
745
Reaction score
314
Location
Finland
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Looks like Barr is in that Ukraine mess - up to his eye balls. Attorney General being involved in Trump's Quid Pro Quo has lost all his credibility - if you ask me. What you think?
 
FinnFox said:
Looks like Barr is in that Ukraine mess - up to his eye balls. Attorney General being involved in Trump's Quid Pro Quo has lost all his credibility - if you ask me. What you think?
Click to expand...

I think once Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton had a tarmac meeting without her resigning holding an Attorney General accountable for their actions is something of the past and we’ve entered a new time of anything goes.
 
Chillfolks said:
I think once Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton had a tarmac meeting without her resigning holding an Attorney General accountable for their actions is something of the past and we’ve entered a new time of anything goes.
Click to expand...

Dude, she had a brief meeting with someone and then essentially handed off control of the investigation to a Republican FBI Director who found little, if anything.

lOcK hEr Up
 
I don't even think we need a trial. The only way this kind of thing will ever get resolved is if we just get rid of every Republican and Trump appointee. In fact, the best thing to do would be to simply ban Republicans from participating in the government and electoral systems. They might even need to be "re-educated". The idea that anyone should have to prove anyone else is guilty of a crime we all KNOW they committed is totally contrary to everything the Constitution stands for. When we know someone committed a crime they should just be done away with, figuratively speaking...unless it's a real bad thing we know they did and then it shouldn't be quite so figurative.
 
Chillfolks said:
I think once Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton had a tarmac meeting without her resigning holding an Attorney General accountable for their actions is something of the past and we’ve entered a new time of anything goes.
Click to expand...

With all due respect, Lynch served in a Democratic administration and, as such, so much as questioning her intent should be a criminal act.
 
As for resignations, what high level officials involved in this mess haven't been lying pretty much since day one?

Trump has lied.
Pence has lied.
Pompeo
Barr
Perry
Nunes

It's grotesque. And they are going to get away with it because the modern Republican party stands for nothing other than trolling liberals.
 
Lutherf said:
With all due respect, Lynch served in a Democratic administration and, as such, so much as questioning her intent should be a criminal act.
Click to expand...

Sorry I temporarily forgot got the separate but equal philosophy Democrats ascribe to.
 
Lutherf said:
I don't even think we need a trial. The only way this kind of thing will ever get resolved is if we just get rid of every Republican and Trump appointee. In fact, the best thing to do would be to simply ban Republicans from participating in the government and electoral systems. They might even need to be "re-educated". The idea that anyone should have to prove anyone else is guilty of a crime we all KNOW they committed is totally contrary to everything the Constitution stands for. When we know someone committed a crime they should just be done away with, figuratively speaking...unless it's a real bad thing we know they did and then it shouldn't be quite so figurative.
Click to expand...

You can tell when someone does not have facts or an argument on their side. They resort to really ****ing stupid straw men.
 
Chillfolks said:
I think once Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton had a tarmac meeting without her resigning holding an Attorney General accountable for their actions is something of the past and we’ve entered a new time of anything goes.
Click to expand...

So that meeting made criminal behavior by future AG's OK? How so?
 
Redress said:
You can tell when someone does not have facts or an argument on their side. They resort to really ****ing stupid straw men.
Click to expand...

Mueller

Kavanaugh

Border security

Impeachment

Presume guilt. Find some ****heads compelling witnesses to testify that they believe the accused is guilty. Impose punishment.
 
he doesn't have to. the mafia in our white house, and those that support that mafia, will give him a pass.
 
FinnFox said:
Looks like Barr is in that Ukraine mess - up to his eye balls. Attorney General being involved in Trump's Quid Pro Quo has lost all his credibility - if you ask me. What you think?
Click to expand...

I think you shouldn't believe anything said by a guy who's trying to work a plea deal.
 
FinnFox said:
Looks like Barr is in that Ukraine mess - up to his eye balls. Attorney General being involved in Trump's Quid Pro Quo has lost all his credibility - if you ask me. What you think?
Click to expand...



Barr has only built up his cred to be the next SC justice. F all else. Unfortunately for him, Trump, the Trumpsters and the Trumplicans, cancer was beaten for the 4th time by Ginsburg. Newly elected Senators take office Jan 3 and the Prez Jan 20. Hold your breath.
 
FinnFox said:
Looks like Barr is in that Ukraine mess - up to his eye balls. Attorney General being involved in Trump's Quid Pro Quo has lost all his credibility - if you ask me. What you think?
Click to expand...


I know that Barr's name has been invoked by both Trump and Parnas....but I can't find any other evidence that he was directly involved in the Ukraine fiasco. But since he has been named....I think the least he should do is recuse himself from any investigations involving Ukraine. Or better yet, perhaps a special counsel is in order to investigate Barr's involvement.
 
Last edited:
FinnFox said:
Looks like Barr is in that Ukraine mess - up to his eye balls. Attorney General being involved in Trump's Quid Pro Quo has lost all his credibility - if you ask me. What you think?
Click to expand...

No, you have a guy making claims he hasnt backed up. If Parnas has some sort of evidence, why is he on Maddow and not before Nadler?
 
FinnFox said:
Looks like Barr is in that Ukraine mess - up to his eye balls. Attorney General being involved in Trump's Quid Pro Quo has lost all his credibility - if you ask me. What you think?
Click to expand...

Resign? HELL NO, he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and tossed in prison, just like his Nixonian archetype John Mitchell.
 
Chillfolks said:
I think once Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton had a tarmac meeting without her resigning holding an Attorney General accountable for their actions is something of the past and we’ve entered a new time of anything goes.
Click to expand...

Now imagine if instead of removing herself from oversight responsibilities in the Clinton investigation, Lynch had responded to the uproar by saying, “**** you” to everybody. Also imagine that Lynch was herself involved in a criminal and corrupt plot to investigate Obama’s political rival in order to cheat in an upcoming election. That is the situation you’d have today.
 
Cardinal said:
Now imagine if instead of removing herself from oversight responsibilities in the Clinton investigation, Lynch had responded to the uproar by saying, “**** you” to everybody. Also imagine that Lynch was herself involved in a criminal and corrupt plot to investigate Obama’s political rival in order to cheat in an upcoming election. That is the situation you’d have today.
Click to expand...

FWIW, I don't know if she actually signed off on the Page FISA warrant but there was damned sure a line with her name on for her to sign.
 
Fletch said:
No, you have a guy making claims he hasnt backed up. If Parnas has some sort of evidence, why is he on Maddow and not before Nadler?
Click to expand...

His evidence fits perfectly with the WH and SD career employee testimonies. He backed up his story with documents and text message exchanges with Giuliani and Hyde.

If Parnas does testify to the senate and his testimony is different than what he said on TV...he could be charged with more felonies. So why would he risk doing that?
 
Lutherf said:
FWIW, I don't know if she actually signed off on the Page FISA warrant but there was damned sure a line with her name on for her to sign.
Click to expand...

WTF are you talking about?
 
Moot said:
I know that Barr's name has been invoked by both Trump and Parnas....but I can't find any other evidence that he was directly involved in the Ukraine fiasco. But since he has been named....I think the least he should do is recuse himself from any investigations involving Ukraine.
Click to expand...

I count keeping it secret as cover up, so he's maintaining this situation from its part. If you know President is doing fishy things you should act and not be pathetic brown nose yes men.
 
FinnFox said:
I count keeping it secret as cover up, so he's maintaining this situation from its part. If you know President is doing fishy things you should act and not be pathetic brown nose yes men.
Click to expand...

Then perhaps a special counsel is needed to investigate his involvement.
 
Cardinal said:
WTF are you talking about?
Click to expand...

You were mentioning something about if she had participated in investigating Obama's political rival. While Obama wasn't exactly in line to be elected again she damned sure had a role in investigating Clinton's political rival.
 
Lutherf said:
You were mentioning something about if she had participated in investigating Obama's political rival. While Obama wasn't exactly in line to be elected again she damned sure had a role in investigating Clinton's political rival.
Click to expand...

Oh but that was different!

Plus, she told her underlings to call the investigation of Hillary a "matter."
 
Lutherf said:
You were mentioning something about if she had participated in investigating Obama's political rival. While Obama wasn't exactly in line to be elected again she damned sure had a role in investigating Clinton's political rival.
Click to expand...

What was her role, and more importantly, what was Obama's role?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom