• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you support

less right said:
Again, name the crime. Name the event or behavior.

Every appearance of a conflict doesn't mean a crime has been committed or an investigation is required.

Otherwise we'd be looking at Ivanka and Jarrod.
Click to expand...

So, let's see. If Trump had put his kid on the board of a corrupt Ukraine oil company and said kid had no experience yet was paid $50-80K per month, you wouldn't think that was a conflict or demand an investigation? Do you think anyone buys that for a second?
 
veritas1 said:
So, let's see. If Trump had put his kid on the board of a corrupt Ukraine oil company and said kid had no experience yet was paid $50-80K per month, you wouldn't think that was a conflict or demand an investigation? Do you think anyone buys that for a second?
Click to expand...
Uh, bone spur has put his no experience SIL front and center in Middle East policy, yet i see no investigation.

And just to clarify, Joe didn't put Hunter on the Burisma board.
 
bongsaway said:
Do you support both sides calling witnesses?
Click to expand...

While I personalyl want witnesses as far as the day is long, it would not be constitutional. Senate has to look at what the house has put together.

In this case...

 
veritas1 said:
So, let's see. If Trump had put his kid on the board of a corrupt Ukraine oil company and said kid had no experience yet was paid $50-80K per month, you wouldn't think that was a conflict or demand an investigation? Do you think anyone buys that for a second?
Click to expand...

Do you think anyone buys this deflection as a replacement for naming the crime and proof of anything?

Trump supporters do. Those with eyesight and sense don't.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Uh, bone spur has put his no experience SIL front and center in Middle East policy, yet i see no investigation.

And just to clarify, Joe didn't put Hunter on the Burisma board.
Click to expand...

No, Ukraine put him on the board in order to gain access to the levers of power. They were buying Joe's office and Joe gladly sold it.
 
less right said:
Do you think anyone buys this deflection as a replacement for naming the crime and proof of anything?

Trump supporters do. Those with eyesight and sense don't.
Click to expand...

Hilarious. The crime? There could be several. Violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for one. What's REALLY hysterically funny is you demanding the "crime and proof." Funny, you didn't need either one to try and impeach Trump. You should live by your own pretend standards.
 
veritas1 said:
Hilarious. The crime? There could be several. Violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for one. What's REALLY hysterically funny is you demanding the "crime and proof." Funny, you didn't need either one to try and impeach Trump. You should live by your own pretend standards.
Click to expand...

What did they do that would be a violation?

This insistence that there was "potential" is the red flag that says 'witch hunt' and 'election season propaganda'.

You've been duped again.
 
less right said:
What did they do that would be a violation?

This insistence that there was "potential" is the red flag that says 'witch hunt' and 'election season propaganda'.

You've been duped again.
Click to expand...

It's got nothing to do with the election season. I doubt the Dems really think doddering, confused old Joe can win at all. BTW, nobody ever knows if a crime occurred until they look into it. If you're so confident in the upstanding nature of Biden, then an investigation should be no problem. Running for office does not confer immunity from investigation or prosecution.
 
veritas1 said:
It's got nothing to do with the election season. I doubt the Dems really think doddering, confused old Joe can win at all. BTW, nobody ever knows if a crime occurred until they look into it. If you're so confident in the upstanding nature of Biden, then an investigation should be no problem. Running for office does not confer immunity from investigation or prosecution.
Click to expand...

I got no problem with investigating the Bidens. But not at an impeachment inquiry or trial. That's just another clue this was just meant to deflect from Trump's behavior.

If you think this whole affair has nothing to do with the election then you might be a Trump supporter. (props to Jeff Foxworthy)
 
less right said:
I got no problem with investigating the Bidens. But not at an impeachment inquiry or trial. That's just another clue this was just meant to deflect from Trump's behavior.

If you think this whole affair has nothing to do with the election then you might be a Trump supporter. (props to Jeff Foxworthy)
Click to expand...

Trump would annihilate Biden. If the Dems have any compassion at all, they won't put him on the same stage with Trump.
 
veritas1 said:
Trump would annihilate Biden. If the Dems have any compassion at all, they won't put him on the same stage with Trump.
Click to expand...

You'll talk about anything but what crime you think Biden committed.

I get it. They haven't told you yet so you're stuck on "potential" for crime.
 
less right said:
You'll talk about anything but what crime you think Biden committed.

I get it. They haven't told you yet so you're stuck on "potential" for crime.
Click to expand...

He used his office to enrich his family. Burisma was hardly the only occasion.
 
veritas1 said:
No, Ukraine put him on the board
Click to expand...
Again, yer wrong.....and the ignorance displayed in your post is astounding. Why do you even bother posting on theses matters?
 
veritas1 said:
I imagine Durham can broaden his investigation to include the Bidens. Your claim that he's restricted to the origins of the Russia investigation isn't based on anything other than you not being told that he's investigating something else. He may investigate Biden and he may not. We'll have to wait and see.
Click to expand...

Now it's "I can imagine". Is that because you're so close to Bill Barr that he is listening to you?
 
tres borrachos said:
Now it's "I can imagine". Is that because you're so close to Bill Barr that he is listening to you?
Click to expand...

I see you've retreated from claiming to know the extent of Durham's investigation. That's progress.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Again, yer wrong.....and the ignorance displayed in your post is astounding. Why do you even bother posting on theses matters?
Click to expand...

The real issue is WHY he was on that board and what he did to be lavishly paid. We know it had nothing to do with oil and gas. Even Hunter has admitted that.
 
veritas1 said:
I see you've retreated from claiming to know the extent of Durham's investigation. That's progress.
Click to expand...

I never said I knew what he was investigating. You're the one who claimed he was investigating Biden. I know what Barr said he was investigating. Is Barr withholding information from us?
 
veritas1 said:
The real issue is WHY he was on that board and what he did to be lavishly paid. We know it had nothing to do with oil and gas. Even Hunter has admitted that.
Click to expand...
This is, by definition, concern trolling. Right wingers like yourself are doing the bidding of Putin to defend the criminality of bone spur. You have zero understanding of this hoax, this dirt digging for orange.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
This is, by definition, concern trolling. Right wingers like yourself are doing the bidding of Putin to defend the criminality of bone spur. You have zero understanding of this hoax, this dirt digging for orange.
Click to expand...

Your obsession with Putin is very unseemly and cannot take the place of actual thought. You not even wanting to look into Biden's possible blatant criminality is also noted. Burisma is but one example. Joe has been involved in brokering quite a few deals that enriched his family.
 
veritas1 said:
Your obsession with Putin is very unseemly and cannot take the place of actual thought.
Click to expand...
huh, I mentioned potus twice, Vlad once....but i'm "obsessed" with V....go figure?!?
You (sic) not even wanting to look into Biden's possible blatant criminality is also noted.
Click to expand...
"possible" means no legal predicate, which is why bone spur wants a foreign state to do an "investigation". You have been duped, bone spur only wanted an "announcement".
Burisma is but one example. Joe has been involved in brokering quite a few deals that enriched his family.
Click to expand...
Again, Joe did not put Hunter on the board........and again, the hypocrisy of a bone spur supporter even mentioning "enriching his family", how many trademarks does Ivanka have now in China? 18 in 2 months? Ive lost count.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
huh, I mentioned potus twice, Vlad once....but i'm "obsessed" with V....go figure?!?
"possible" means no legal predicate, which is why bone spur wants a foreign state to do an "investigation". You have been duped, bone spur only wanted an "announcement". Again, Joe did not put Hunter on the board........and again, the hypocrisy of a bone spur supporter even mentioning "enriching his family", how many trademarks does Ivanka have now in China? 18 in 2 months? Ive lost count.
Click to expand...

When you can tell me what Burisma paid Hunter for, please do. He had no experience, no skills, no language ability, no nothing. They were paying for ACCESS to Joe. Everybody knows this except children and liberals.
 
veritas1 said:
When you can tell me what Burisma paid Hunter for, please do. He had no experience, no skills, no language ability, no nothing. They were paying for ACCESS to Joe. Everybody knows this except children and liberals.
Click to expand...

So far, you claimed Joe put Hunter on the board at Burisma, now he was hired for "access" to Joe. Funny thing is, Joe repaid Burisma by getting a new Ukrainian Prosecutor General who would not drag their feet on investigating Burisma.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom